User talk:ThienNhaiLangTu

January 2023
Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vietnamese poetry have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat  (Talk)  14:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * What is promotional about it? It's a fairly complete treatise on the topic of popular Vietnamese poetry fornm. ThienNhaiLangTu (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Please reflect on what you are doing.
 * I think it's you who is the one who is vandalizing the article. How much do you know about Vietnamese poetry forms? Why do you delete a link that provides very useful information about Vietnamese poetry forms and the rules of making Vietnamese verses ?  ThienNhaiLangTu (talk) 15:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vietnamese poetry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat  (Talk)  15:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Vietnamese poetry. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Equine-man (talk) 15:12, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Vietnamese poetry shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Equine-man (talk) 15:12, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)