User talk:Think2exist

Nomination of Influssertiveness for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Influssertiveness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Influssertiveness until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PlanetEditor (talk) 16:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Influssertiveness


A tag has been placed on Influssertiveness, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PlanetEditor (talk) 16:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for promotion
Your user page says "Think2exist is a creative organizational development consultant that is using wikipedia to launch his brand!"

Wrong. Sorry, but you have not understood what Wikipedia is: a project to build an encyclopedia. It is not a free advertising platform, and is not for promotion of any kind. Among the policies and guidelines that explain why your plan to use Wikipedia is doomed to failure are:

. JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not for things made up one day
 * WP:Conflict of interest
 * WP:No original research: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it."
 * WP:NEO: "Articles on neologisms are commonly deleted, as these articles are often created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term."