User talk:ThinkBlue/Archive 1

Image tagging for Image:158pi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:158pi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:01081pi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:01081pi.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:138111pw400.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:138111pw400.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:31107pi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:31107pi.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing wrestling articles
Ignoring warnings and changing images to fair use images is considered vandalism. Please stop.«»bd(talk stalk) 18:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. «»bd(talk stalk) 19:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:06121pi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:06121pi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:00038xce.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:00038xce.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

WWE photos
Please stop uploading WWE photos as pd-self when this is clearly not the case. Those photos are obviously copyrighted and, presumably, belong to the WWE or one of the broadcasters. Please stop. Metros232 02:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Normal 010.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Normal 010.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla 18:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Normal 010.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Normal 010.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:August28th-01.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:August28th-01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla 18:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:August28th-01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:August28th-01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:0125.jpg.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:0125.jpg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla 18:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:0125.jpg.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:0125.jpg.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
Your continued violations of Wikipedia image copyright and fair-use policies are placing the Wikipedia in legal jeopardy. These actions are taken very seriously. You have been blocked for 24 hours. You are welcome to resume editing once the block expires but you must refrain from uploading any more images until you have fixed the substantial problems with every single image you have uploaded. Any further violations will result in a longer block or possibly a permanent ban from editing the Wikipedia. --Yamla 18:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:200px-Shanemcmahon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:200px-Shanemcmahon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Viv dx.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Viv dx.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 18:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Removal of Warnings
Please do not clear your user talk page of notices from the community about possible policy issues. At best, it makes us more suspicious of you. Please take the time to respond to anything you feel is inaccurate. Autocracy 23:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Steph mcmahon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Steph mcmahon.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 17:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)


 * You claim this image was released under the cc-by-2.5 yet the source website makes no mention of this. What did you base your license claim on?  --Yamla 23:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

You said: "Hey, again, I e-mailed Jen, the owner of the imahe of Steph_mcmahon, she said it's fine to use the image. As long as its used fairly. So, does that count?"


 * So long as it is fine to use outside of the Wikipedia, so long as it may be used commercially, and so long as people are free to modify the image. Requesting copyright permission covers this in detail and explains how to forward your permission email to the appropriate people.  If you are doing so, please make a note on the image page because it can take the permissions list a while to respond.  --Yamla 23:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

John Cena question
You asked: "Hey, I have a question. Since your an administrator and stuff. I've met John Cena and have asked him what's his favorite baseball team and he responded by saying "The Boston Red Sox". Now, I put that on his personal info. page and it got deleted, because some said I needed a "reliable resource". So, I find his bio. on another website and stated there that his favorite baseball team is in fact the Boston Red Sox. Then I checked and it was gone because some said that wasn't reliable. So, where does that stand at?"


 * Hi. Good question.  The policies in play here are WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:CITE.  The key points are that the information must be verifiable and reliable.  So, when you ask Cena a question, that's not verifiable.  There's no way for me to double-check this.  I suppose I could ask him myself but he may have changed his mind, at which point there's no way for me to tell if you were lying or if Cena changed his mind.  So, what about a bio on another website?  Depends on whether or not this is reliable.  If they cite this information and state that Cena said this in a specific interview in a specific magazine, say, then this would probably be reliable.  If they just make the claim without saying where they got the information, though, then it's not reliable.  Many biographies (and, interestingly, very many bios on imdb) contain false information.  Check the policies I pointed you at above and let me know if you have any questions.  --Yamla 23:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

You said: "Hey, what about a fan site? Cause their reliable. Right?"


 * No, fansites are rarely reliable. --Yamla 23:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Randy Orton
You asked: "Hey, another question. I read an article, someone was interviewing Randy Orton and they asked him a lot of questions. And they asked him who was his best-friend in the WWE and he stated that it was John Cena. And again, I put that in his personal info. that Orton was in fact best-friends with Cena. And I put the internet source and again got DELETED. Another suggestion?"


 * Well, it could be that the person considered it not particularly notable. Hard to say for sure in this case, though.  I personally looked at that edit initially, checked the reference, and thought it was reasonable to stay.  Now, if only everyone on the Wikipedia believed I was the ultimate authority on everything, we'd have none of these sorts of problems.  ;-)  --Yamla 02:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Adopt offer
Bloddyfriday If you want I'll adopt you. Bloddyfriday 13:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Adopted
Tell me all you want to learn at my talk page and I will do the best I can.

What I know
First off I noticed you've been in trouble a lot, but not intentionatly. If you haven't already apologized in the best way you can think of, you should. You could tell the people that your sorry and prove it by joining some memberships on Wikipedia, making good edits, Articles and stuff like that that will help the site. I would hate to see you banned. Sorry that it sounded like some boring lecture you would recieve at school. Now you have asked me to teach what I know, No matter if someone starts a fight on you or not don't fight back, try and solve it the best way you can and if it continues then go report them. Also if you don't agree with someone elses edit and the put it baack after you change it ask them why they think that edit belongs in the article and then tell them why you don't think it belongs in an article. Finally if there is a problem you can't solve and none of your friends or I can solve then seek help from an Admin. I'm sure you know all that, but I tried my best. If you can think of a more specific area that you need help with I might be able to be of more help. I'd like to apologize for sounding like a know it all above (or a complete idiot), that is just the best I could word it, hope I helped you some how.

You friend Bloddyfriday 15:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Creating new articles
No, You don't have to be a pro to create new articles. Though the one I've spent some time on ended up deleted, but hey if it got deleted it deserved to be deleted. The way I see making new articles is it had better be a very spectacular article for it to not be deleted. Bloddyfriday 00:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedians who are fans of HBK
We don't use main space for internal stuff like this. If you intend this to be a user category then you need category space. If you intend it to be a general essay it should be in project space and if you want it to be a userbox you should create it in a sub-page of your userspace. In other words it will need to be deleted because its in the wrong place. Main space is for articles not self referential stuff like this. Please make sure you take a copy of your box so you won't need to recreate it from scratch. Regards --Spartaz Humbug! 22:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * What exactly do you want to do? How you go about it depends on your objective. --Spartaz Humbug! 22:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure, just copy over what you need from the article to a page in the correct area and start off. The page in mainspace will be removed in due course as housekeeping. I'm happy to help but I need to know what you actually want to do with this. --Spartaz Humbug! 22:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You now have a page in your area to store any userboxes you wish to create. Its at User:Zerorules677/Userboxes. Is this what you wanted? --Spartaz Humbug! 22:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Michaels-sweetchinmusic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Michaels-sweetchinmusic.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 21:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

E-mail confirmation for Image:Michaels-sweetchinmusic.jpg
Re: [Ticket#2007032810019124] Fwd: Re: Picture Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:45:42 +0000 To:	"Amanda Moulkin"  From:	"Permissions"  Add to Address BookAdd to Address Book  Add Mobile Alert

Dear Amanda Moulkin,

Thank you for your mail.

Amanda Moulkin  wrote:

> > > Note: forwarded message attached. > > > > > > > > > - > Be a PS3 game guru. > Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games. >

If you wish for your text to be included in Wikimedia projects, you must release it for publication under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). This license may be viewed at .

Images and other media are allowed if they are under a similar license (such as certain Creative Commons licenses). You can see the allowable licenses at .

If you provide us with a clear statement that you are releasing this content for redistribution under an allowable license, then your content may be used on Wikimedia projects.

Thank you for your understanding! Please see  for more information.

Yours sincerely, Michelle Kinney

-- Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org --- Disclaimer: all mail to this address is answered by volunteers, and responses are not to be considered an official statement of the Wikimedia Foundation. For official correspondence, you may contact the site operators at . Zerorules677 15:36, 03 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Michaels-sweetchinmusic.jpg
Uh, I tried putting the one that says: The copyright holder gave me permission to use the image in wikipedia and something came up saying: "Speedy deletion". Would it help if I copy the url of the verification use of the image? Zerorules677 15:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Simple permission to use the image on Wikipedia is not good enough. Wikipedia is a free content encyclopedia, so any image needs to either be under a free-content license, or meet Wikipedia's rules for fair use.  Also, make sure the person you're asking permission from is authorized to give that permission: generally only the copyright holder is able to release an image under a free license. --Carnildo 00:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Good and Bad news
The Bad news is my mom is said she is going to disconnect the Internet connection at my house, I can still get on at school, but not much so I'm not going to be able to help you. The good news is I doubt you need my help anyways, you know how to do alot of stuff I don't know how to, so I'm going to Graduate you and good luck in life and on Wikipedia. Bloddyfriday 15:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Graduation
You said: "What happens when you were adopted (on wikipedia) and then you graduate?"


 * Sorry, I'm not sure. :)  --Yamla 01:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosmart_M425 Zerorules677 08:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'd take a look at The Guide to writing better articles, and Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Also, don't forget that information must be cited a reliable, published source per WP:A. I hope this helps. Peace, Bmg 916  Speak Sign 02:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:Films Welcome
 Welcome! Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add User WikiProject Films to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:
 * Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].


 * The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for January has been published.  February's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
 * Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia.  Check it out!
 * Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 04:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 22:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

About Page Archiving
You do not need to be an admin to archive pages. WP:ARCHIVE describes some of the methods that can be used for you. In your case, I archived your talk page the same way I archive my page by moving the page to User talk:Zerorules677/Archive 1, added the template to the top and bottom, and then going back to your main talk page and editing that to remove the redirect and replace it with the archive box (which you can see as the first line on this page). I hope that helps out, and I'll be happy to answer any more questions you may have... just write to me on my talk page again. -- Auto ( talk / contribs ) 01:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

I could but...
The images only purpose is to display the SCM and the rest of the crowd around the kick itself is clutter. The commons license allows it to be adapted so cropping it is allowed and near as I can tell there has been no loss of detail in the image so I'm unsure what you mean by "made it terrible". –– Lid(Talk) 01:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I will also inform you, as you don't seem to know, that anybody can revert an image to its previous state by clicking (rev) next to the image. –– Lid(Talk) 01:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 22:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm Thinking Blue...
Thanks for the comments the Talk:Shawn Michaels section. He is someone I would like to meet as well. Would love some advice on how you made your "About Me" page look so cool so that I can more properly introduce myself. Smobro68 08:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

User Adopting
Jump on in! :) -- Auto ( talk / contribs ) 22:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

IP on Shane McMahon article
Don't worry. He is in violation of WP:BLP. If he continues to revert, he will be blocked. In the mean time I advice that you too stop reverting as this aggravates the situation. -- bullet  proof  3:16 20:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Right now that doesn't seem necessary since it is only one troll that is causing this chaos. BTW its "protected" not "locked". This isn't a board or a forum. Just saying. -- bullet  proof  3:16 21:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No one's a "PRO" here. Just a little bit more familiar with the policies and guidelines than others. Anyway, it seems as though the troll has finally calmed down. Good.-- bullet  proof  3:16 21:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Shane McMahon References
Not sure what you meanLa Parka Your Car 21:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC) You still need a source for the 1993 and 1998 job titles.La Parka Your Car 22:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Birthday Committee
Politics rule 22:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond
Special Windler  04:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I know you gave support to our next collaboration, please help our current collaboration, Dr. No (film).  SpecialWindler   talk  10:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Little context in Fue Por Ti
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Fue Por Ti, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Fue Por Ti is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Fue Por Ti, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Fue Por Ti itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Little context in El Vive Hoy
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on El Vive Hoy, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because El Vive Hoy is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting El Vive Hoy, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate El Vive Hoy itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Cheers!
Thank you very much for wishing me a happy birthday, it made my day that little bit brighter. Cheers! Dfrg.msc 06:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


 * You're WELCOME!!! I'm just doing my job!!! Since I'm part of the [[WP:BDC|

Birthday Committee]]. Maybe you can wish me a Happy Birthday when my B-Day arrives.  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ericson-alexander-molano.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ericson-alexander-molano.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:03, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cena-2006.jpg
The image is the wrong size for the infobox. The infobox automatically scales images up or down to 200 pixels wide and that one is only 160. «»bd(talk stalk) 13:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ericson-Molano.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ericson-Molano.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * (replying to message on my talk page) — The short answer is "yes". The long answer is "please read the first non-free content criteria". If there's anything else I can help you with, please let me know. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Randy Orton .jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Randy Orton .jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * (replying to message on my talk page) — First, "Wikipedia use only" is not good enough. Second, the permission you got is not very useful because it is not from the image's copyright holder.


 * It should be pretty easy to find a replacement for this image if the copyright status cannot be verified. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * (replying to message on my talk page) — That's great that you read the image upload guidelines. Have you also read Requesting copyright permission? —Remember the dot (talk) 02:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * (replying to message on my talk page) — I am not an administrator, so I do not have power to delete images. The image will be deleted in 14 days if its copyright status has not been confirmed by that time. This is because it's possible that there is a user out there who knows who took the picture. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * (replying to message on my talk page) — It's possible that a user knows who took the image. That's why we wait 14 days to see if anyone knows something about the image that allows it to be kept. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Fue Por Ti
I deleted that article after another editor tagged it as empty, which it was. If you recreate it, please make it a full article, with references. That will ensure that it is not deleted again by someone else. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 20:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Fue Por Ti, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Finngall talk  21:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, but I'm not psychic--I can only judge an article based on what's there, not what's going to be there. Given the tools at an editor's disposal, there is no reason to have incomplete or "under construction" articles. -- Finngall  talk  21:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I've removed the tag. Thanks, and take care. -- Finngall  talk  21:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ericson-Molano.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ericson-Molano.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)