User talk:ThinkBlue/Archive 13

RE: RE: JD
I was told by SRX to wait till he finishes his review, but the peer review is closed and I'm thinking I'm just going to nominate it tonight. How are your other projects going? -- Will C  00:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, you think I should nominate it? I don't care, any help is grateful. Okay. Projects? I have multiple projects as well as trying to work on my now existent social life. I have Sacrifice to copyedit before I nominate it for FA. I have Slammiversary to finish. Hard Justice to nominate for GA soon. TNA Bound for Glory to nominate for GA. I almost have TNA's Roster page complete. I have as well to copyedit No Surrender to place on the waiting list now that Bound for Glory IV is happening tonight. Bound for Glory is happening tonight so I have to take care of it and make sure I do not get blocked for fixing people's problems. I also have to source and finish Bound for Glory in my sandbox. As well as finish Final Resolution and Against All Odds 2008. I have alot of projects, but nothing I can't handle.-- Will C  01:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I see you removed Judgment Day from the waiting list. Have you given up on it?-- Will C  21:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh okay, well good luck on that. Hopefully you'll have more luck than I am with Lockdown.-- Will C  21:43, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I see you getting it FA in no time. It is going fine it is just no one is saying anything about it. Length is a problem but I do not know what to remove and keep in the event section. I have one oppose because of the length problem. I'm trying to change it but no success as of yet.-- Will C  21:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

That is what I'm shooting for. I've cut down all the matches. All I can do is remove the eliminations in the Xscape match. They want me to remove two of the background matches. Look at the reason why I don't want to on the FAC page.-- Will C  22:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * They want me to remove two feuds from the background and cut the event down so it doesn't go into so much detail. The event isn't that big. I only mentioned important things.-- Will C  02:28, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

GA article - pass/fail?
Hi there, I've cleaned up Abergil Crime Family, addressed the issues and added some extra info. Is this ready to pass GA? -- Flewis (talk) 07:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I've expanded the prose and addressed the other issues. I think this article may now be ready. -- Flewis (talk) 08:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Pike Place Fish Market
Since you passed Pike Place Fish Market as a "good article", you might want to see my remark at Talk:Pike Place Fish Market. I wouldn't be surprised if there were similar problems elsewhere in the article (it's rare to see exactly one citation problem). Any idea how much you followed up to check out citations? - Jmabel | Talk 05:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Request
Akshardham (Delhi) was being reviewed for GA status, however the reviewer mysteriouly retired in the middle of assessing the article. I was wondering if you could finish up his assessments    Juthani1    tcs 20:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond New Collaboration of the fortnight
  The Windler      talk   00:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Noel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_Hurricane_Noel_in_the_United_States

I see that you made this a good article. I have no desire to stop people's requests for GA. A request for GA can get articles improved. However, I am not too happy about the article. It is a long dizzy list. There should be better analysis of the storm track, easy to find windspeeds of the course of the storm (rather than searching through different paragraph), and an analysis of how the storm is different or the same.

On the other hand, if I visit the GA page and start saying how the articles are not so good (doesn't imply lack of effort or intellect) then people will think I have a sour attitude. This is not the case. Chergles (talk) 17:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. The article is now up for FA, not GA. Chergles (talk) 17:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Halloween GAH
Hi, I noticed your recent comment on the GA review of Halloween. The references you point out to be dead or unavailable seem fine to me, they aren't even noticed by the link checker tool. Could you please reply? -- Music 26/  11  13:20, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Congrats


Congrats to you, too. Yeah, its fine. I'm working on Parachutes; "Shiver" and "Don't Panic" are on GAN. Any help is appreciated. --Efe (talk) 05:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Welcome. Thanks for informing me. I'll drop him/her a message. --Efe (talk) 10:35, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I sensed it too but I asked him/her first. I'll revert all the "British" changes when there is no reason given. No respect of the editors here in WikiPedia. --Efe (talk) 10:44, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, my. I think you were delayed because of this. Sorry. The article, I think, is fine. --Efe (talk) 08:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I once worked on "What Goes Around" and FutureSex but it seems that his songs have limited info, unlike Coldplay. But we'll try. I'm working on novels now. hehe. --Efe (talk) 05:32, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Romance? I don't mind the genre. After all, we're after the sources. Hehe. Am working on some Nicholas Sparks novels, Paulo Coelho (soon, hopefully), and The Elegance of the Hedgehog. --Efe (talk) 07:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Never. Its just that her least-popular songs don't have enough sources. I'll be working on them soon, especially my next FA. =) --Efe (talk) 03:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe I would "retire" when I myself retires from editing this site. Hope it would never happen. Haha. I still on the process of choosing which one is near to FA status. You, you have plans or anything? --Efe (talk) 05:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Its either B'Day or Dangerously in Love. It depends. Your always welcome buddy. "... if it wasn't for you, I probably wouldn't have a GT to my name." That is what we called collaboration. =) --Efe (talk) 01:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

X&Y
I'll try and make it conform with British English after supper, but I'll see whether it conforms with WP:ENGVAR first. :) &mdash; neuro(talk) 17:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * /me tries to not bias the article on the fact that I really hate coldplay &mdash; neuro(talk) 18:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hehe, I didn't mean that! I'll do it, but bear in mind that I do very little article work. :P &mdash; neuro(talk) 18:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. :) &mdash; neuro(talk) 18:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh, thanks a lot. First barnstar, whoopee! :D &mdash; neuro(talk) 18:16, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

There's a Riot Goin' On
Got it fixed up.

Dan56 (talk) 00:51, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Main Page redesign
The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, P retzels Talk! 10:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Aaron Eckhart Peer Review
I'm currently reviewing the article; I'll add comments as I go. The citations seem to be fine, so I'll focus mostly on prose. Ink Runner (talk) 21:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Unretirement... sorta
Here... I've "returned". T he  C hronic  05:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Hey..-- S R X  00:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

We've had our diffs but...


 Hairy Perry  has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Please from deep down...I'm sorry about our diffs and wonder if we can be friends...if not then please enjoy the cookie anyway.  Hairy Perry  16:27, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

And...A Happy Halloween to you too. Thanks.  Hairy Perry  18:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Happy Halloween
Back at ya. I'm good, how about you? Thanks for the congratulations for NWO, especially in Spanish :) I'm happy since the third time was the charge.-- S R X  17:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Really, which is your GT? Congratulations! My next FA? I don't know, I think I'm stopping at 2. I just don't have the motivation or spirit to write articles anymore, the project is not what it used to be and I see no point in writing for the project anymore. If I eventually get enough spirit or motivation to write another FA, it will be Bad Blood (2003), maybe.-- S R X  18:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't remember saying SS was going to be my last one :) But I think NWO will be, WP:PW is just to much stress. I was working on reformatting the championship lists, like I did to List of World Heavyweight Champions (WWE), but so much drama had to come up at WT:PW, I just want to give up.-- S R X  18:17, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I will sue you! :) I know, if you want to propose something expect people to dramatize the whole situation. I think I will just avoid PW for a while, I rather just keep working at FLC, I thought you were gonna go there? :)-- S R X  18:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You don't need lists to review them, if you just look at the FL criteria, you can review them based off of that, just like you do with the GA review templates.-- S R X  18:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No, all prose rules apply to FLC's as well. It's only in tables that they can be linked more than once.-- S R X  19:15, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Do you want to help convert the championship lists into the new format?-- S <sub style="color:blue;">R X  19:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah it's at WT:PW. It's here for the WWE title. I have the old reigns under the new table, we just gotta fill it in.-- S <sub style="color:blue;">R X  19:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Just use the old information under the table and substitute into the table with the new format, use the others one I did as a template. S <sub style="color:blue;">R X  19:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Not quite, you have to reformat it correctly. Like this..the notes have to be in normal font, if the old table doesn't specify a event, use House show but pipelink it to read Live event. Plus, link every instance of the locations and events and do not use sortname templates for like wrestlers with one name or a controversial name like Batista or Andre the Giant.

-- S <sub style="color:blue;">R X  20:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know if he wants to do WWE stuff? Plus that would bring edit conflicts between three of us. Also, for vacated ones, keep increasing the number because I am counting it. If other instances say "held up" just place vacated.-- S <sub style="color:blue;">R X  20:48, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * So you're not going to help anymore?-- S <sub style="color:blue;">R X  16:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * They sure do. S <sub style="color:blue;">R X  17:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Half-Life 2: Survivor GAN
I don't know if you're still doing GAN reviews, but if you are, could you take a look at Half-Life 2: Survivor? I can't find much more information for it (that's in English and from reliable sources, at least); what is there is pretty much what I've got. Do you think I need to add anything else or is it good for GAN? Gary King ( talk ) 19:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright thanks Gary King  ( talk ) 19:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Unlinked Gary King  ( talk ) 23:42, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond New Collaboration of the fortnight
  The Windler      talk   00:24, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for October 2008
SoxBot II (talk) 02:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer for GA
Hey, ThinkBlue,

I believe I've addressed your comments. Could you take another look over the article?

Thanks, --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 18:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Aaron Eckhart
I've only had time for a glance. The article looks in better shape than when I reviewed it last month on FAC, but I really need to read it thoroughly again, which I can't do just yet as I am more or less completely bogged down. I'll get to it when I can. Brianboulton (talk) 18:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

What's up
Hey, how's it going, I didn't talk to you for a while. Been caught up in so much work I forgot I had WikiBuddys.  R k O r  T o  N  13:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Maggie Gyllenhaal
I'm just a little confused by some of the reference changes you've been making on this article and hoped you could clarify it for me. One thing that I'm not clear about are the blanket changes from "cite web" to "cite news", even on refs that are clearly only refs from the web, such as from goldenglobe.org, metacritic.com, rottentomatoes.com, oscars.org, etc. It doesn't seem to me to be necessary and is taking up a lot of time for you. Another is the inclusion of the website companies that hosts some of the pages, an example of which is Variety. In that particular case, Reed Elsevier is the company that handles the web application, they aren't the publishers of Variety. In another case, News Corporation is inserted, which is an umbrella parent company and not the direct publisher. I guess I'm wondering why you are converting these refs to include details that aren't required in the citation template instructions and that I haven't seen elsewhere, even on featured articles, and in a lot of cases are redundant. An example: The link itself indicates it is a website and the format parameter instructions say "Format, e.g. PDF. HTML implied if not specified." In this example, there are two publishers indicated, although the company itself is only one entity. The work parameter instruction says "If this item is part of a larger "work", such as a book, periodical or website, write the name of that work." In this case, abcnews is the website and it seems to me that using either publisher or work as ABC News covers all of that.

Without belaboring a lot of small examples, I'm simply wondering why so much detail, some of which is redundant. None of the citation usage examples incorporate all of those details in that way. Has someone requested all of that in a review? It's confusing to me, and again, I'm afraid you're making way too much work for yourself. Thanks for your patience with my questions.

Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I wasn't questioning the unlinking of dates, which is something that the reflink tool does automatically and I routinely unlink dates with that. Also, I'm not suggesting that you unlink these ref changes, or that I plan to do so. I was confused by some of the changes, and noticed some things that were troublesome, like the large changes from cite web to cite news, expansion of publisher/work, which seems redundant to me, the use of the format=Web, which isn't what that parameter is for, and also that in some of the cases, such as News Corporation (not Conglomerate and I don't know why I wrote that), they aren't the publishers of the given works. The company also owns HarperCollins, but they aren't the publishers, HarperCollins is. I'm not sure what wiki manual you're referring to, and not sure what The Dark Knight discussion you're referring to, there are a lot of archives there. I'd like to read whatever discussion that is, if you have specifics on it. Good luck on your FAC. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Idlewild Park
Hey ThinkBlue, I addressed your issues.  Grsz  11   →Review!  21:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review and promotion!  Grsz  11   →Review!  23:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Art Deco
Hi there. Any chance you could do a GAR of this article? It'd be much appreciated. Elucidate ( light up ) 20:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

GA review request
Hi ThinkBlue. I've noticed you're impressive GA reviews on Wikipedia, and was wondering if you could review 1970 Tonghai earthquake. I realize that this is small, but that is because the Chinese government covered up details of the quake until 2000, and even then very little was let known. ~ the editorofthewiki  ( talk / contribs / editor review ) ~ 00:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Jim Raynor review
Thanks for the review! A quick question, when you say the wikilinked planet names "need to be linked correctly", do you mean that they should point to the relevant sections in the target article? If so, I've modified the redirects to do that. I've also dealt with the dates in the references. If I understood you correctly on the planet wikilinks, I think its all done. -- Sabre (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Excellent! I think I've addressed all other issues in the review then (fewer than I was expecting, I kept having a nagging feeling I'd missed some prose elements). -- Sabre (talk) 23:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Coldplay songs
Yep, I have plans of bringing some Coldplay song articles to FA status, but not working until I have settled my other workloads. Hope we can collaborate on it. --Efe (talk) 11:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks Blue. --Efe (talk) 02:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Maggie Gyllenhaal
Sure, I'll be able to look over the article; I've got Veterans Day off from both regular school and Chinese school, so I'll have a lot of time. I'll review it on the peer review page, is that okay? Ink Runner (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Joe Biden presidential campaign, 1988 GA review
Thanks very much for the review! I have made changes to address your concerns, as noted at Talk:Joe Biden presidential campaign, 1988/GA1. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks again! Wasted Time R (talk) 00:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

RfA
Hey ThinkBlue, I know that you ran for Adminship back in March, and failed. I opposed you then, but doing a quick review it looks like you are a different candidate today. If you are interested, I would be happy to review your edits more thoroughly for a potential second run? I am not promising anything, but I'd be willing to give you an honest assessment. Let me know. (also respond here. I HATE talk pages like yours where the conversation jumps back and forth between multiple people.)--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 01:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Were you one of them? :) Just kidding. Um, sure I'm interested in what you can do to help me out. Maybe looking at my last Rfa will probably help out, just saying. Hey, there's no such thing as "promises to be made", so its fine, if I learn something, then something has been accomplished. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll take a closer this weekend, you look like you've come a long way since your first (failed) attempt. I know that I opposed because you were almost all automated tools... now it looks like you've become more of a content builder and work in more diverse places.  I'll let you know what I find.--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 15:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool, I'll be looking forward to any comments that you may have. Thank you and I did take the comments in the Rfa very seriously, so I hope that can help me out, or not. Yes, I've done my share in working in different areas here, and I'm proud of the work I've done. Also, thank you for taking the interest in trying to help me out with this, I appreciate it. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I haven't looked closely at you yet, but when I gave my quick once over I was surprised at the reason why I opposed your first go around... so I do believe you when you say you took it to heart. Your emphasis seems to have changed significantly---BTW, I think I saw that you were in TX?  Where abouts?  I'm in Houston.--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 19:31, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you that means a lot. You don't know how I felt getting opposed, wasn't fun. Actually, I don't reside in TX, I've visited before, San Antonio, but never resided. I'd like too, but my place belongs in Vegas. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Think, I just spent several hours reviewing your edits... I've been looking for a reason to think that an RfA at this point in time would turn out differently. While you are a heck of an asset to the project, I don't think you would be a good candidate for an RfA. The problem is that while you fill a helpful niche, the niche you fill doesn't allow you to demonstrate policy or guideline knowledge. While I see civility and a person who is sought out to help, I don't see a need for the tools or demonstrated knowledge of policies and guidelines. If you are interested in running for adminship in a few months, I would be proud to be your admin coach.--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 01:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Please, call me Blue. :) Well, I didn't really want to run for a second Rfa this year, maybe trying it again next year. But, when I got your message, I started to have hope, sounds dorky, I know. Don't get me wrong, I know where your coming from, I do understand the policies and guidelines, but some did get to me, if you see the Rfa. True, I did participate in what Admin. type work, but after my Rfa, I focused on working on other projects, besides wrestling. But, I'm gonna start going back to that and see where that leads me. Also, if you don't think that I'm ready, I wouldn't want to waste your time in something that there's no hope in. If your willing to try and work with me, I would promise you that I would not let you down. My answer is yes in you being my coach, but, like I said, its up to you if you want to be my coach or not. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I definitely would NOT say there is NO hope... I do think you need to do some more work in "adminly" areas... areas such as XfD, Help, AN, or other areas where you can show that you know policy and guidelines. Right now, *I* know that you do, but it would be hard to convince others who give a 20-30 minute review of your edits that you do.  If you decide you want to run, drop me a line and I would be happy to look you over again.  I just don't believe in nom'ing people unless I think there is a decent chance of their passing.  While I see that you've addressed many of the concerns from your first RfA, people are going to look at this and say, "Well, she didn't show her understanding in round 1, what has she done to show it in round 2?"  Again, I do think you are doing a great job here... and I do think coaching would help you (You'll notice from my talk page that I don't take everybody who asks me to be their coach---I have to see strong potential before I take somebody as a coach.)--- Balloonman  PoppaBalloon 02:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm gonna go back and start working there, definitely a criteria to become Admin. Exactly, like I told others that I needed "rehab" (coaching) to progress from my failed Rfa. Thank you, I appreciate you crediting me in the areas that I work at, I appreciate it a whole lot, especially coming from you. ;) Totally. I would appreciate if you can help me out, if your still interested in helping this poor soul. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

1,000 contributions
I got my 1,000th contribution yesterday, I'm so excited, I've been on here for six months now. It's great, sorry so excited I had to tell somebody. Later, <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  13:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah i saw your little userbox thats quite an accomplishment and wait your still not an admin or was you at one time or something. I don't know, I'm confused. Thanks for the congrats though, Wow...<font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  15:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

So what was the problem? Looking at your contribs that seems like some good editing to me. Did they say why it didn't pass? Thats some BS I would have voted for you if I could've. I want to be an admin someday, but if somebody with 21,000 more edits than me can't get an RFA, I don't even know if I can or not. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  15:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

So they rushed you to answer questions or you just rushed on your own. So you have to work in multiple fields well, I think I'm doing that, I'm not quite sure though. Well, still you'd be a good admin in my book, but I'm still going to wait awhile before I go for an RFA. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  16:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I hope one day to be an admin, but how do you actually work on articles of deletion? I mean I have had articles deleted before, but what do you actually do. I am mostly an article bulder and a vandal reverter, but I'd like to get into other projects and stuff, do you have any suggestions? <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  16:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I get what you mean now. Is there anyway to find out the articles right now that are crrently going the the deletion process. There is one thing about the Twinkle. I have IE and it doesn't work on it, so about a vandal reverting tool, I don't know but I can do as much as I can to try to be an admn though. Plus, I have made quite a few admin friends, somaybe they can help out on what they would like to see me do. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  16:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I have already started, I think what I went to was Today's AFD log and saw a couple of interesting articles and a couple not so interesting, but I only commented on one which you can see in my contribs. No that wasn't me with Twinkle, but I tried to get it though, it sat in my monobook forever. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  17:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Its wasn't me unless I accidentally put it in there or something, well hey if it is sitting in your monobook can it still show up that you use Twinkle? <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  17:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Well then I don't know, you must have got me mixed up with somebody else. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  17:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

No I don't have it, I've heard about it, but don't really know what it does or anything. What is rollback, because I see you have it. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  17:42, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I have requested it, well we will see where it goes from there. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  17:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Jeff Hardy
Hey Blue! Well, the only one I think of is the Mule Kick variation that he does sometimes. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:20, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It could be. I'd say so, it's the only kick he does really apart from dropkicks, and you can't call them back kicks. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL. Well, I suppose "expert" sounds better than "biggest fan in the world ever"! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd say either HBK or Orton! I rarely have to unvandalise remove vandalism from those articles cause you've got it covered! ;) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * YAY! A barnstar!! Thanks I really appreciate it! LOL, you've made hundreds of edits to Orton's article and you think he's "just blah"?! Crazy person... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Says the eighteen year old teenager... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL. Maybe, but what would I use for the main article? Like when I nom Jeff, Matt and Lita, I'll use the Hardy Boyz article as the main (kind of title) one. Finlay/Hornswoggle don't have a tag team article. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I've no idea. I got tired of all the bitching/whining/moaning/etc that went on at the talk page, so I took it off my watchlist. I only look at it occasionally. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

<--Oh, I totally agree. Too many arguments. I still work on the article, but I'm not bothered to argue over table formatting or whatever stupid topic any more. Too much effort. I prefer to put my effort into the actual article themselves. It just works better. ;) You seem to be doing good at GAN. So many reviews! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * True, true. Wise sensei! ;) LOL. It's good that you've found a little niche. I wouldn't have the patience to do that - I hate doing peer reviews/etc. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:13, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That'd be good! I have been looking for a new project... Both the Miz and Morrison's article are in pretty good shape - it wouldn't take much to get them to GA. Yea, I'm up for it!! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No you can't! LOL course you can. I'd be glad of the help. ;) I'll get stuck in this weekend, after my Biology test tomorrow... Maybe I will join a music wikiproject. I'll look into it. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That'll be awesome. Yes, master *salutes* I'll catch ya later, 'k? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! ;) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Eisenhower National Historic Site
Eisenhower National Historic Site Should be ready for your approval.-- Gen. Bedford his Forest 00:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Half-Life: Decay GA review
All done! -- Sabre (talk) 08:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Rollback
They didn't give me rollback because they said I didn't have enough vandalism reverts and because I made a couple mistakes on an interwiki link and a ref tag error. I don't know, I guess I will just be patient and wait until I get some more experience. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  14:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok, will do. Thanks for all the advice you've given, <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  15:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * To Hairy, Rollback rights can be a hard thing to get, just hang in there and try in a couple months, maybe by then ThinkBlue can give them to you. =)  SteelersFan  94  19:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:05, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Aaron Eckhart
At long last I've got to the peer review, and left comments. Brianboulton (talk) 19:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * On the Paycheck issue, it's no big deal. What I would do is say that the film "garnered generally negative reviews", and end the sentence there. Cite the sentence to Chicago Sun-Times review as at present, and try to find one more reputable review via a google search. I've got my doubts about Slant magazine, which you posted me - if possible, find a review from a recognised paper or magazine. But don't spend a lot of time on this - if necessary the Sun-Times can stand alone. Brianboulton (talk) 21:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Kate Bosworth
Hey, how's it going? I've been uploading images all last night and still have plenty more to add. If you look at the image's source, I already did crop it a bit, and it looks to be about the same size as the prior image that was in the infobox. If you add the imagesize parameter to the infobox you can adjust the size if you wish. Let me know if you need further assistance. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 19:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, what did you need? --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I can try sending some requests for additional images to users on Flickr later this weekend. Do you not like the current images on the page, or are you looking for something in particular? --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll try my best, but it all depends on if the author will allow releasing the rights. I was so happy to get permission for that Matt Damon image. I just got permission for over 200 images, so I've been trying to get all of those uploaded over the last few days. It's great to see so many articles lacking images now having a high-quality one in the infobox. Anyway, I'll search later this weekend and will keep you updated if I find anything. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I just searched through 29 pages of Flickr images tagged for the actress and after sorting through about 500 unrelated Dark Knight images, I think I found one (you'll notice it is from the same premiere as the current image near the end of the article). I sent permission to the author, so I'll let you know if it gets approved. It's currently already tagged with an acceptable license, but I want to ensure that the user is actually the author of the image. Hopefully the image can be used, as it is the only high-quality image I could find with her directly facing the camera. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Gyllenhall: preparing for FAC
I'll read it through tomorrow and generally check it out. Brianboulton (talk) 22:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Want an FL?
Remember our List of WCW World Tag Team Champions? Well I found a reliable source for the reigns, only thing is, it only sources up to the first vacation of the title in 2000 by Bischoff and Miller. We can either cite the episode for the TV results, but we also need the results for WCW PPVs, want to help and get another FL?-- S R X  00:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well you can try to find reliable sourcing for the PPV results after the vacation of the title by Bischoff in 2000 (title reigns after that on PPVs need reliable sourcing, the TV results we can source with the cite episode template. After that, we need to reformat the table, we can split that in half, you do half and I do half, but we'll do that later, first try to find the sources while I work on the lead. (Our Dream FL =])-- S R X  00:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That's cool. Sure, I'll do the first half and you can follow :). Haha, yeah I am. But this is more for me than the project, I feel it's right for Owen :)-- S R X  00:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S. - I found the reliable sources for the PPVs, SLAM wrestling has results for those PPVs :)-- S R X  01:08, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S.#2 - I started the table conversions in in this sandbox, I hope you can understand how the table works, but if you can't I will be glad to explain it.-- S R X  02:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You're not gonna help?-- S R X  22:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh my bad, I didn't even see that comment. We replace them later, after we reformat the table. How about we do this, how about you work on our half in a different sandbox, and then we can combine it when I'm done my half. Where do you want to split it, in order for it to be half?-- S R X  23:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That works for me. Note, that we will split the list into three sections. The ones from the NWA era, from it's inception to the first recognized WCW reign, which is Doom's reign in the 1990s. Then split it from the WCW era, until the last recognized WCW era, and then the WWF era. So I will split mines from the NWA era with the WCW era, and add the WCW era to your table. Then split yours with the WWF era. I hope you understand what I just said :). Copy my format in my sandbox and like 2 examples. I recommend closely looking at the vacated reigns I have outlined and the ones which have wrestlers with the same name, such as Jerry and Jack Brisco because they have templates different from others. Also, after you use the sort template up to the #9, you don't need to do it again, but unless #'s under 10 appear, it needs to be in the sort template.-- S R X  23:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Try to do the first 5 to see if you correctly format it :) Also, tell me which sandbox of yours.-- S R X  23:22, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The first 5 for your half. The WCW era begins with Doom's reign (Ron Simmons and some other guy), we will list this one twice for list purposes, in the NWA era and in the WCW era. Also, for notes, do not use small text. TV shows go in italics in the event column, and make sure you list the individual reigns like I did, i.e. ThinkBlue (3).-- S R X  23:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't hesitate to ask, I want to ensure you get the formatting correctly and ensure we get this to FL. S R X  23:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay few things, check out the difference with your version and mine.


 * Numbers that range higher than 09 do not need to be in a sort template.
 * Under the event column, it should only state the name of the event, i.e. Power Hour, and not "won the titles at Power Hour.
 * Remove the old references when reformatting the new table.
 * You need to link every wrestler and stable name every time due to the sortability feature. So you need to find out who is in the Fabulous Freebirds and you need to link them and the Freebirds article itself, same thing for the Steiners.
 * The notes need to be in regular font size.
 * States should be written as Baltimore, MD versus Baltimore, Maryland.
 * If you appear on reigns that were won on tape delays, fix the date by placing the date the titles were won under the date column and add the aired date in the notes like I did in the difference.
 * For vacated reigns, you need to add the dash (the long one located under the "Do not copy text from other websites without a GFDL-compatible license. It will be deleted." text under the edit summary in the toolbar thing.) where the # goes, like I did in the difference.
 * You need to add the wikitonary link for the word Vacated everytime.
 * After vacated reigns, if a tag team win the vacant titles in a tournament, delete the old wording and rewrite to make it a complete clause, i.e. Anderson and Zbyzsco won the title in a tournament final.
 * Lastly, place the wrestler (in a tag team) with the last name/name that comes first on the alpha. before the one that comes later.
 * )-- S R X  01:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm done with my half.-- S R X  02:53, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Stop right before the title reign before the WWF bought WCW, I will work from there. Or do you want to stop before the PPVs that need specific citing, I mentioned it above, I can't remember which one it was.-- S R X  04:11, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * So you're gonna stop before the WWF or before the ones needing ref changes?-- S R X  04:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay. I'll do the WWF ones then.-- S R X  15:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, before you get too far, remember you have to link every wrestler and tag team everytime, even if they already were linked. S R X  15:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You think you can finish by tonight?-- S R X  23:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome, try to.-- S R X  23:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Great. I know you will. Lets try to nominate it tonight!-- S R X  00:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The Return of Truco: Awesome. Yes you can, the rules don't prevent that, as long as you expanded in five-fold it should be good, I'm pretty sure.-- TRU CO 02:34, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I missed Truco 2 :) [maybe I should rename myself again XD] Umm, how about ...that at Taboo Tuesday (2004), fans, for the first time in professional wrestling history, were able to vote on stipulations for matches?-- TRU CO 02:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If you feel it's good, also check to see if it's 200 characters (w/o the wikimarkup). I think Truco may come back to Wiki.-- TRU CO 02:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Wiki markup: i.e. TRU CO' 02:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but I'm just saying that it doesn't count as characters. Also, in your half, you don't need to keep saying "TV Taping." Also, you need to pipe some of those events, like WCW Power Hour to Power Hour. I would link the other names right now, before you get too far into your half.-- TRU CO 02:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If you were gonna do that last go ahead, I'm not in charge of you, I just don't want it to be hard on you. Also, you need to state that some of those were on tape delay.-- TRU CO 03:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The thing is, some of them you have the name of the stable, but you don't have the name of the wrestlers. Like "The Outsiders" it should be in Wrestler A and Wrestler B and underneath should go the tag team name.-- TRU CO 20:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I added the WWF reigns. Tell me when you're done so I can add the sourcing and do some copyediting to your half.-- TRU CO 21:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, for the vacated reigns, you need to include a number under the "reign" column, the last vacation from the NWA was at 5.-- TRU CO 21:35, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, we're almost done. Can you do me a favor and try to see which tag team has held the title the longest, it probably may be on the main page.-- TRU CO 21:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Finally!.-- TRU CO 23:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It really was, hopefully it pays off :) We got 10 days.-- TRU CO 23:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, you may never know, there are strict reviewers out there.-- TRU CO 23:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It looks like we got our next FL :) - TRU CO 02:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for updating the GAC template on Mike Lockwood. Unfortunately it's been too long since I've done reviews, though that is something I plan to change and I must get accustomed to the slightly different templates in use. Cheers. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Maggie Gyllenhall - final comments
As requested, I have left some final review comments on the talkpage. Brianboulton (talk) 19:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I will definitely leave some FAC comments soon. Brianboulton (talk) 10:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Metroid Prime 2: Echoes
Heya, do you think this article is good enough for GA? Gary King  ( talk ) 21:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If you've got time! Let me know if you want anything looked at yourself. Gary King  ( talk ) 21:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah no problem, I will pick the song I like the most. Gary King  ( talk ) 21:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You gonna get to that review? I wanna submit it to FAC once you're done :p Gary King  ( talk ) 20:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah those are done. Gary King  ( talk ) 20:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * And I tried to fix your GA review requests, see if anything else is needed. igordebraga ≠ 23:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Feel like reviewing The Day the Violence Died? :) I can review whatever you've got, but nothing wrestling-related preferably :p Gary King  ( talk ) 21:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

The Miz
Yea, it looks good, just two things - a) Can the last paragraph be made any longer? It just a little short, and b) The last line of the third paragraph - "Though, they lost the tag team titles in July 2008." - is it really neccessary? It just makes the paragraph sound a little strange in my opinion. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 11:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool. Apart from that it looks awesome! ;) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Great. :) I did some tinkering on Morrison's article today, but it really doesn't need that much work, in my opinion. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah. I might have forgotten 'bout that one. It's not on my watchlist. I was about to log off for the night, but I'll take a look tomorrow. It's a pretty new article I think, so it'll probably need the most work. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I agree. LOL! Yea, I'll talk to you tomorrow! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 20:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey...
Whats going on with Wikipedia today? <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  13:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It depends, whats up?-- TRU CO 21:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Never mind, its the new look that evrybody voted for, I don't like it to much, but hey its Wikipedia gotta make the best of it. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  15:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * CHARTS:   Video Sales - Recreational Sports DVD
 * Performers: Not Listed
 * Title: WWE: No Mercy 2004
 * Issue Date: 12/11/2004
 * Distribution Label: Sony Music Entertainment
 * Video Label: Sony Home Video


 * CHARTS: Video Sales - Recreational Sports DVD
 * Performers: Not Listed
 * Title: WWE: No Mercy 2004
 * Issue Date: 12/18/2004
 * Distribution Label: Sony Music Entertainment
 * Video Label: Sony Home Video


 * CHARTS: Video Sales - Recreational Sports DVD
 * Performers: Not Listed
 * Title: WWE: No Mercy 2004
 * Issue Date: 12/04/2004
 * Distribution Label: Sony Music Entertainment
 * Video Label: Sony Home Video-- TRU CO 21:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

My Rfa
Hi Blue. Its fine, I know you're a busy girl. Thank you for the post-Rfa support. --Efe (talk) 07:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Bazooka GA Review
Hi there. I've left some notes on the Bazooka talk page referring to your review; I don't think the article is anywhere near GA standard at the moment, primarily due to a lack of info and extremely poor referencing. Skinny87 (talk) 07:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Re No Way Out 08
Hey, I've been okay, I guess. How about you? No, I placed those type of messages on all of the WWE 2008 ppvs because I kind of feel I'm the updater of the PPV expansion list. I wanted to keep it up to date as possible and wanted to see if anyone was going to work on it. There is alot of 2008 WWE ppvs on that list that say up for grabs and I've been wanting to change that. Plus I was wondering if you were going to take it to GA so I could move it to the under construction section on the list. I probably will not work on a WWE ppv until I finish all of the TNA ppvs. I'm too busy in real life and on here to take up another article. So far I've got three on GAN and Lockdown at FAC. Also thanks for the luck. Plus I have about 6 more 2008 TNA ppvs to finish and the 2004 Victory Road and 2005 Against All Odds.-- Will C  23:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, good luck with Judgment Day. It seems like it is a race now. I was the only one working on 2008 ppvs and now there are two WWE ppvs on GAN and one that is a GA, while there are three TNA ppvs on GAN and two GAs. Lets see who gets all of theirs done first: TNA or WWE. I only left them on pages I knew no one was working on or was just unsure. Who expanded NWO? Yeah, I guess I can. I'll have more time in one week. Next Friday I probably will be on wikipedia more than usual since I'll have alot of the stuff I've been doing in real life done. So yes, definitely I can help you. I kind of like helping people now. Plus it gives me more practice and I have many more articles to get to FA.-- Will C  01:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, well what article do you want me to help you with. I forgot to ask that last time I left a message?-- Will C  06:44, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I guess I can.-- Will C  22:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * All articles can be FA in my mind. It says that all articles should of a good or featured status. I plan on taking that literally and make alot of articles FA just so they are at their best and not just passable. I don't give up. I still have a shit load of 2008 articles to get done which I'll probably have done this week. That extra time is going to help me out. I look forward to helping with Judgment Day.-- Will C  23:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I've done the samething. Right now the only articles I have done that have a chance at making FA are Lockdown and Slammiversary 08. If I ever get around to working on Sacrifice then it will have a chance as well. Right now the only article I'm working on that deals with the Mafia is Turning Point and it is almost finished in my sandbox. I have the background wrote and part of the event. I just need to cut it down and source it, but it isn't a main priority at the moment. I can't place it up for GAN till after December 7. Though I do have an idea with the Mafia. See I've wrote their article already and just waiting for them to become notable on here and I'm going to place it up. After a month or two I was going to nominate it for GA. Maybe a Good topic can be made off of it. Though Nash, Sting, Booker T, and Steiner will all have to be made GA, but that would be a good project if you want to work on that together in a few months.-- Will C  23:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I probably won't start on their articles for a few more months. First I have the following projects to get done, Final Resolution (January 2008), Against All Odds (2008), Destination X (2008), Sacrifice (2008), Slammiversary (2008), Victory Road (2008), Hard Justice (2008), No Surrender (2008), Bound for Glory IV, Turning Point (2008), Final Resolution (December 2008), Genesis (2009), Against All Odds (2009), 2008 Total Nonstop Action Wrestling pay-per-view events, Victory Road (2004), Turning Point (2004), Final Resolution (2005), Against All Odds (2005), No Surrender (2006), Bound for Glory (2007), A.J. Styles, Samoa Joe, Beer Money, Inc, TNA Bound for Glory, and the TNA 2008 World X Cup Tournament. So I won't even be thinking about The Main Event Mafia for a while.-- Will C  00:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * No. I do know the ones I will have done before the new year though. I'll have Destination X, Turning Point, Victory Road, Final Resolution January, and Against All Odds. I'll be close to finishing Bound for Glory IV. If I try hard enough I'll have it finished as well, though not fully finished. By fully finished I mean FA. By finished I mean on GAN or at FAC. I'm taking Bound for Glory IV straight to FAC and not going to GAN. I'll have all the 2008 ppvs finished besides Final Resolution December. Victory Road 04 will be done and the 2008 TNA ppv events article will be as well. I have Bound for Glory 2007 on DVD so that can be done anytime. I'll probably have TNA Bound for Glory finished as well.-- Will C  01:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Right now I'm just shooting to have all of TNA's 2008 ppvs done. They are all future projects but that is over time. If I get alot of time I'll work on anything I can get done. I have the ability to have everything I said finished before the new year but I don't want to work myself to death doing it. I have a plan to have all of TNA's ppv by GA before the end of 2009. Starting with Victory Road 04 and going the whole way till Turning Point 09 being GA before the end of 2009. So either way I'm going to get it all done. Alot of work will have to been done to Survivor Series from the look of it. I don't expand out in the open that much anymore. Too many users and ips wanting to screw up the article.-- Will C  02:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Cena gets alot of shit from people for no reason. Now I'm not much of a fan of him, I use to hate him when he won the rumble, but then I looked and just saw it isn't his fault. WWE books him that way. He isn't like playing politics like Triple H to get into the main event all the time. I like TNA more than WWE and I give respect to WWE and the wrestlers for doing great things but I hate the bookng team and people who play politics and keep people down. I believe Cena should be depushed for a brief time before the fans completely hate him. I feel both of the Hardys should be pushed better and the younger talent. I'm tired of Triple H, Orton, and Batista.

Re: Miz
Much better! It's awesome, I say add it to the article now! ;) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Em, could you do it? Also, not to make you do all the work or anything, but do you feel like doing the lead for the tag team article as well? ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. ;) Yea, I have one up there. Still. *sighs* Anyway, it'll be a while before John Morrison and The Miz up there. It's in terrible shape. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yea, I know what you mean. Oh, you mean that unconsciousness angle WWE decided to do? I was so pissed when I found out it was a work. Bye-bye Jeff's chances of winning the match tonight. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:27, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, apparently the whole thing is to set up an Edge/Jeff feud, so... Yeah. Yea, I'd love to help with Unforgiven, but I warn you I've not very good with the whole out-of-universe. I can tell you if it sounds wrong or suddenly changes tense ot something, but I won't be able to fix it. I'll certainly help out if I can though. ;) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yea, it's like Déja vu. Sure, I can do that! ;P ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well Michaels winning makes me happy. Cena winning would make me homicidal with rage at the stupidity of the "creative team". Great! Let me know when you plan to nominate it! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 01:53, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I much prefer the old, funny Jericho, but even new crappy Jericho is better than Cena... Alright! I'll catch ya later. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:05, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, the truth hurts! Later. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 02:05, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

<--Officially homicidal with rage... ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 03:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't really mind Edge with the Championship, I just hate the way he won it. I wonder if he'll ever win a championship without cheating,/being introduced in the middle of a match/etc. It sucks. I do like however that there's supposed to be an Edge/Jeff feud, so keeping my fingers crossed for Jeff as WWE Champion! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * True, true. :) Hey, you had HBK and Cena win. You can't have everything. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yea. :) Hey, I don't know if you've ever seen this but wow. Type in Shawn Michaels and look under User statistics :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL. I come in second on Jeff, Matt and the Hardy Boyz. Kind of disappointing. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 16:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * LOL. Yea, anyway, I'll let ya deal with your FAC. Later! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:48, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It makes sense, but it's phrased a little awkwardly. Perhaps something like: "she had a summer job, working as a waitress in a Massachusetts restaurant". ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem! ;) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

"Shiver"
Oh my, I did not notice the article was put on hold. I think you're done addressing them all, though I've done a very minor formatting there. Thanks Blue. --Efe (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, yep. Same through with Parachutes. I would like to help you with the remaining X&Y singles, but it seems the tools keep me busy. But I will try doing some stuffs there, hopefully. --Efe (talk) 03:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hopefully. The tools? Not necessarily; its just that I'm enjoying them, each day I learn how to use them prolifically. --Efe (talk) 03:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Before, I was thinking of bringing "Crazy in Love" to FA status, so that each album will have two featured singles. But B'Day is somewhat more ready. --Efe (talk) 06:55, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll be working on the article once I got Nights in Rodanthe ready for DYK. Well, "Yellow" was like ready when it got GA but it was this whole Beyonce thing that keeps me off. --Efe (talk) 23:12, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hehe. Not really. My idea was to give another Beyonce-related article a try before going into other stuffs, like possible Coldplay FA(s). You know. --Efe (talk) 23:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Arrgh!!! You're giving me something to add on my load. Well, I don't know which one. But once the writing history of the song comes out in the internet, then that's the sign. Hopefully. --Efe (talk) 23:35, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I was just kidding. ;) --Efe (talk) 02:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow. If the remaining will be passed, probably we can nominate two albums for GT. Thoughts? --Efe (talk) 02:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Parachutes is now ready. --Efe (talk) 02:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Later, after my class. This is good. --Efe (talk) 23:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Done with Featured topic candidates/Parachutes, Blue. I have created Featured topic candidates/X&Y, but left the comments for you. Note: The template is not yet transcluded in Featured topic candidates. And by the way, if the image doesn't suits you, feel free to change it. --Efe (talk) 04:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Maggie Gyllenhaal FAC
I notice that the FAC has stalled somewhat, with no substantial comments after my own, several days back. Have you let the reviewers who helped the article at GA and peer review know that it's at FAC? They don't always look! If you have, there's not much else you can do, but if you haven't, a carefully worded note to each might widen the discussion at FAC, and give you useful feedback so that even if the article fails, you will have a better basis for improving it. It's something I generally do when I do a FAC nomination. Think about it. Brianboulton (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Let me just stress you can ask for comments, but you shouldn't ask for support as that would be canvassing. Brianboulton (talk) 17:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Tisdale
I made my feelings known, but wasn't planning on doing the entire formal review. If it sits much longer, I'll do it, but if you want to do it, feel free. So long as you don't ask them to turn her article into a deodorant commercial, that is.&mdash;Kww(talk) 18:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Go for it.&mdash;Kww(talk) 18:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Maggie
Can you give me a few days and I'll have a look. That woman is very close to my heart! Ceoil (talk) 03:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks
<font face="Trebuchet MS">design by neurolysis | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies

Want another FL?
Looks like List of WCW World Tag Team Champions is on it's way to Fl status, want another?-- TRU co 22:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Its about football though..still up for it?-- TRU co 22:39, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome, except I'm a Saints/Ravens fan :). Also, the list is about a rival team, still up for it? List of Cleveland Browns head coaches.-- TRU co 22:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * At least we still have our quarterback :). Do feel you can create the table? Like the one I did for the List of New Orleans Saints head coaches? Then I will created the prose.-- TRU Co 22:46, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Haha. Yeah it should be exactly like that. So to find out that information use this and click on each coach (the name not each entry) and the website has their stats summed up for when they coached for the Browns. Then just source it using the URL for that coach. Understand? Plus, you can use the same key, except just reword the Saints part to the Browns. Another thing, we also have to find out if they won any awards.-- TRU Co 22:54, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, do you want to split it or you can handle it? Also, I need the table first in order to write the lead. In addition, I removed his "credit" to those FL's and DYK. Plus, I think the JayLethal2008 account is a sock to the one you showed me. (Was that what you caught on his page, the FLs?)-- TRU Co 23:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well these are relatively easy lists to do, and yeah if you can, no rush. Just create it somewhere and tell me when you are done so we can publish it into the mainspace. Also, yeah, I think he needs an eye by an admin for those socks.-- TRU Co 23:30, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, take your time. I just hope its done by the end of the week:) I let Nikki know.-- TRU Co 23:30, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That works fine with me. Marginally it has, so use it sparingly.-- TRU Co 23:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

List of WCW World Tag Team Champions was promoted to FL status
Congrats partner! We got the dream FL ;) Scorpion just promoted it a few moments ago. Plus, I revamped our old FL List of WCW Hardcore Champions so it wouldn't be nominated for WP:FLRC. Again congrats.-- TRU Co 20:56, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It's okay, you can hold it off for a while if you want. I lost my strive for it :) Just take it step by step. -- TRU Co 21:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool.-- TRU Co 21:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you want to work on another championship list?--SRX 21:23, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Eh, you replied too late. I was thinking List of ECW Tag Team Champions and List of ECW Television Champions but me and Matt are working on it now. How about List of WWF Light Heavyweight Champions or List of WWE Hardcore Champions? (I prefer Light Heavyweight ;])--SRX 21:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Wanna do the usual? Split the table work in half or do you want to do it on your own? Then I'll work on the prose.--SRX 21:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * So split it?--SRX 21:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Use the table at List of WWE Hardcore Champions as a template. Think we can be done by tonight? :D--SRX 21:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * How do you want to split it?--SRX 21:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay. I'll do the NWA ones and you do the WWF ones. Also, above I said WWE I meant List of WCW Hardcore Champions.SRX 21:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * My bad, how about we split it where the WWF began recognizing their reigns?--SRX 22:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * So I guess I'll do the ones the WWF recognizes. I hope you remember all the formatting things we had to do with the old table.--SRX 22:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Since your half has probably non-notable wrestlers, do your best finding links to the wrestlers and its okay if you leave maybe a couple, but not a lot, non-linked. In addition, for the countries, don't use the abbreviations, only use that for U.S. states. So "MX" has to spelled out to Mexico and JP to Japan.--SRX 23:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm done my half.--SRX 23:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * There are a few fixes I gotta do to it, but before I do that, can you write in the events as House show pipelinked to Live event for the blank ones since thats where they took place.--SRX 00:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep.SRX 00:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll be waiting.--SRX 03:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * We're done. I'll see if we can get a DYK out of it, and then we can wait like 2 days before nominating it for FLC. --SRX 22:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * =)--SRX 23:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond New Collaboration of the fortnight
  The Windler      talk   21:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

FAC
I am fairly busy, but have started to read the article and will weigh in on the FAC in the next 24 hours. Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">&gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 13:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I replied on the divorce in the FAC. Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">&gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Congratulations - just saw it was promoted to FA! Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">&gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 00:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

GA recent delisting
Where was this discussion?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Rollback
I finally got it like I told you I would, I'm going to be the best rollbacker ever!!!! <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  18:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Question
Looks fine to me. Gary King ( talk ) 21:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep Gary King  ( talk ) 21:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

RE
Well considering you want me to help you get it to FA, I might as well help with its GA review to get to know the article.-- Will C  21:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * No, I didn't do much, I just made a few fixes to the lead and background. Not enough for a GA box. You take the credit for. No, I'm not. Why?-- Will C  22:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * No, it isn't right to me. I haven't done enough to earn one. Yeah, I guess I can, it may take a while since I do not have a good attention span and I might forget what I'm doing.-- Will C  22:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * No, that has nothing to do with it. I just feel like I don't deserve to say I help get it to GA when all I did was make five fixes. One edit is not enough in my book. Also, I plan to work on a WWE ppv one day after I finish all of TNA's. Crap, I've already asked iMatthew if he would like to help me get Starrcade 83 to GA or FA when the Starrcade dvd gets released. Plus I've offered my services to Nikki to help with WrestleMania 1 to get it to FA. It is just a personnel choice.- Will C  22:33, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, you are up right now. I'm helping no one at the moment. I'm just waiting for Lockdown's FAC to end. Nikki never accepted anything. I just asked if she ever thought about taking it to FA, and told her I would help her out with it. I don't plan to write a full WWE ppv for a long time. I have around 52 ppvs at the moment on TNA's side to get finished. Plus I just found about 20 full TNA ppvs online, so I'll have alot of new ones pop out soon. I kind of think that WWE's side has enough users working on them at the moment.-- Will C  22:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, you are going to get help. I don't believe I've ever said something on here I did not do. I said I would give No Mercy 03 a copyedit and I did but did not do a full one is probably the only thing I have not done. Okay, I will after I get done with Lockdown's comments and Judgement Day's as well.-- Will C  23:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, also about Night of Champions. So far the first paragraph makes no sense: "It was the second annual event under its name, it was the eight annual event in the Night of Champions chronology event." I like that you use chronology. I'm guessing you took that from Lockdown. Also, the ending of the match is not needed for the second paragraph. Since you are going to tell how they won in the event section, it does not need to be in the lead. I've re-written the lead to the a way I like below.

"Night of Champions (2008) was a professional wrestling pay-per-view (PPV) event produced by World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), which took place on June 29, 2008 at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas. It was the second annual event under the Night of Champions name and the eight annual event under the Vengeance/Night of Champions chronology. It starred wrestlers from the Raw, SmackDown, and ECW brands. Like the previous year before, every match on the card was contested for a championship; three were won and five were retained.

The main event was an interpromotional match for the WWE Championship between SmackDown representative, Triple H, and Raw representative, John Cena; Triple H won and retained the championship in the match. The predominant match was also a interpromotional match for the World Heavyweight Championship between SmackDown representative, Edge, and Raw representative, Batista, which Edge won to retain the championship. The main match from the ECW brand was an interpromotional standard match involving three wrestlers for the ECW Championship, in which ECW representative, Mark Henry, defeated the champion and Raw representative, Kane, and SmackDown representative, The Big Show.

Night of Champions received 273,000 PPV buys, up from the 2007 event figure of 243,000 buys. This event helped WWE increase its PPV revenue by $21.9 million compared to the previous year's event. When the event was released on DVD, it reached the fourth position on Billboard's DVD Sales Chart. The professional wrestling section of the Canadian Online Explorer website rated the entire event a 7 out of 10 stars, higher and lower than the 2007 event's ratings of 5 and 7.5 out of 10." -- Will C  00:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. Well for you to know I'm reviewing Judgment Day now. I might not get all down tonight but if I don't then I'm going to review the lead and I'll finish it all tomorrow since I'm becoming a little busy now. I don't think I'm ever going to get a break in real life.-- Will C  01:03, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'll continue with Judgement Day. I don't think I'm going to be able to get the peer review done today but I will Friday no doubt. I'll probably take a break after I get all of TNA's 08 ppvs done. If I try hard enough that will be around the end of the year. I kind of enjoy working on here.-- Will C  23:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, but I'll eventually get it done. Well let me just show you what I want to do before I take a break. Here is a link to what I want to do: here.-- Will C  00:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * What do you think?-- Will C  22:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * That is the plan. Lockdown has two supports for it. If it passes I know what an FA is and will not make the same mistakes twice. No one else has thought of doing that, well that I know of. All articles should be of a featured stature. Just doing what wikipedia says.-- Will C  23:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * No, I won't. I actually plan to get all of TNA's ppvs to GA so I'll last. I have strong will power. I also am going to do that eventually. Been planning that for Bound for Glory.-- Will C  23:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The order I'm taking them is Lockdown (2008), Bound for Glory IV after I finish it in my sandbox, Sacrifice (2008), Slammiversary (2008), Turning Point (2008), Victory Road (2008), No Surrender (2008), Hard Justice (2008), Destination X (2008), Final Resolution (January 2008), Against All Odds (2008), and then Final Resolution (December 2008), and then finally 2008 Total Nonstop Action Wrestling pay-per-view events. Order may very after Turning Point.-- Will C  23:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, but I don't work as hard as you think. I'm kind of lazy.-- Will C  00:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy? I don't work as much as I should on here or in real life.-- Will C  00:19, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * You're going to laugh in February. I have something planned that will make the plan I've showed look like crap. I'm not going to tell you though.-- Will C  00:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Trust me you can't beat this. If I succeed people are going to freak.-- Will C  00:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll show you mine if you show me your's. Well in this case I'll tell you mine if you tell me your's. lol-- Will C  00:32, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Well since I like you I'll tell you anyway. Come February I'll have all of TNA's ppvs done. I've already began. My plan is to finish this week and next week on all of the 2008 ppvs and then go back and read all the impact reports from 04 to recently and write each background for all the ppvs in subpages. After time start writing the events since I've found every event from Turning Point 08 to Against All Odds 07. Possible if I stay focused.-- Will C  00:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, listen, I had no sleep the entire day yesterday. I went from 4 pm Friday when I woke up to 6 am Sunday morning. I started at 9 am Saturday mornning and created these two articles and finished what you see in them by not even paying attention: 1-2. I also worte and fixed a few things here. If I get enough sleep and work then I can do it.-- Will C  22:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * For this, no. They can hire me and make me their booker. For once I would like to see Dixie Carter at the mall in Nashville. That would be the best day because I can persuade her to hire me and fix the shit they do every week. Hell Borash would be just as good. He's an idiot. I enjoy writing this stuff. I had nothing else to do besides write. Well I did but I rather have wrote and read up on wrestling than do school work and clean my room.-- Will C  23:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Well I'm home schooled so my mother already knows. Just something about writing and doing something useful helps me. I can feel a sense of accomplishment after I get something to GAN or GA. Plus I like to aim high and do something no else has ever done.-- Will C  23:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Do you think I'm special? lol The funny thing is iMatthew said everyone is afraid of me because I'm valuable for working on TNA stuff. That doesn't make much sense to me. After I leave someone will take my place. I took TJ's place.-- Will C  23:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * It is a joke. I know I'm special, because I'm so damn pretty. It was a compliment. He just worded it weird. I also believe Doomsday will be since I saw he was going to work on AAO 05, which I convinced him to let me work with him on it. I want to expand all of TNA's ppvs, with someone or by-myself I just want my hand on all of them. It sounds bad, it sounds kind of selfish but I started expansion process for TNA again after the one who was doing it got blocked, so I feel I'm really the director of TNA stuff and want them all to be good. Plus I like glory. lol-- Will C  00:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I got to worry about that shit too. I hate all these rules. Though considering I'll probably have them all done by February and no one can then interfere in my master plan. (insert evil laugh here) Too bad, because I am so damn beautiful. I make cows look like Brittney Spears, sober. Plus I believe Doomsday has more focus on the WWE stuff than TNA. Which to not sound like an asshole, is a good thing to me. Less competition.-- Will C  00:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, because I'm ugly as fuck. I'm annoying as well. Great person to be around. (scarcasm) Actually from what people tell me, like my new friend Chase he states "You're fucking awesome man". Maybe I am a cool person to hang around with since I did almost make my friend Harly fall down from laughing. Yeah I kind of thought you were. I thought you were working on it but then Doomsday took it and I was like "what the hell?". Hey, all you need to do now is finish Taboo Tuesday 05 and Cyber Sunday 08. Then take the Cyber Sunday list and make it into an article like I did with TNA Bound for Glory. Take all of those to GA and get yourself a good topic. No one can stop you there.-- Will C  00:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I know, I was joking. I put myself down to make people laugh. I don't take myself too seriously. Shit when I flirt with girls in my county I make fun of everyone and myself. Thats why people love. As a good actress once said "You love me, you really love me". As my user page says, you can call me anything and as long as you mean it in good fun I will not care. Seriously Chase calls me Fuckface and I'm like hey, whats up. Well good luck with all of that.

Night of Champions and other stuff. I'll get around to finishing JudgMent Day's peer review soon. I'm slow at stuff like that.-- Will C  23:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Well don't think I don't give a shit. I'm not one of those insocure people. I don't give a shit what people think about me. I'm 6'1 and weign 260 pounds. I'll sit on you and kill you is my moto. The way I present myself shows most people what kind of person I am. I make fun of everyone all in good fun. I will make fun of myself because it is easy. I'm just unique. I see Night of Champions passing. I still find it funny that you did not have to be anything for JD's GA review and it passed. I made a few fixes got on the next day and saw it passed. You probably got on and saw that it became a GA and was like "what the hell".-- Will C  00:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Not to sound like it needed alot of fixes but I was also surprised JD did not have that many problems. Yeah I do as well. I'm hoping the review ends this week. I wonder how many problems Hard Justice has. Since Nikki said she wanted to review it. Just remember after Lockdown I plan to help you get JD to FAC. I have not forgotten. I'm a man of my word.-- Will C  00:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Congrates on Maggie Gyllenhaal. Will C  07:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. Dead. Will C  22:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm just waiting for it to end now. I got two supports. I've asked the only people I know that will review a wrestling article, so I'm just going to wait. Will C  22:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Hola!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks"> Hello ThinkBlue, ThinkBlue has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I know we haven't really talked since the hole ordeal months ago, but I though I would say hi. IMO we were good friends before all of this and I though we could start over. Cheers  SteelersFan- 9  4  22:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * When I created those socks.  SteelersFan- 9  4  22:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Featured topic candidates/30 Rock (season 2)
Thank you for reviewing any 30 Rock related GANs. Now, there is something else you can do, but it only really requires one word. ;)  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  04:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the support. :)  Corn.u.co.pia /  Disc.us.sion  22:04, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, we can't get a DYK for our new list because its not long enough to qualify for five-fold expansion. Sorry.--SRX 21:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I nominated it, but it got shot down.--SRX 21:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and then we will nominate our list a little later.--SRX 22:49, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, hopefully reviewers will see the same :)--SRX 22:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure. But, is there another PPV you did, or is that your personal choice, because an FA should be something that is exciting and not just a regular PPV and I cant remember if JD08 was exciting or not.--SRX 22:59, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Or ones that have a interesting storyline?--SRX 23:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * You know what, I think we can make do with Judgment Day, it looks fine for FA.--SRX 23:16, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope. I just quick glanced it and saw that it has FA potential. --SRX 23:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Your welcome, and it really does.--SRX 23:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I recently added the license. Excuse me. -- MisterWiki  talking! :-D  - 00:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry, I recently added the fair use rationaly with FURME.  MisterWiki  talking! :-D  - 00:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

List of Jacksonville Jaguars head coaches peer review request
Hey, if you've got time could you peer review List of Jacksonville Jaguars head coaches at Peer review/List of Jacksonville Jaguars head coaches/archive1? It's really short—a list with just two items. Thanks in advance! Gary King ( talk ) 02:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks Gary King  ( talk ) 22:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Maggie Gyllenhaal promoted!
I was delighted to see that your article is now featured, after what seems a very long FAC. I have been monitoring the page, and for a while I wondered where the reviewers were. But it all came good. I don't know if this is your first FA (it seems to be your first listed at WP:WBFAN) but I know it won't be the last. Great work. By the way, are you really only 18? Best wishes, Brianboulton (talk) 01:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

J.L. Lewis photo
I am having a problem with the photo J-L-Lewis.jpg --- I want to do the copyright correctly (Wikimedia Commons), but I'm not getting it right. I also want to delete the earlier version of the same photo. Can you help? Rmshane (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for being helpful! I opened an account at Wikimedia Commons, uploaded the photo, seemed to work.  the photo at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:J-L-Lewis.jpg shows the copyright notice, and says to Please remove this template if a copyright license tag has been added.  But I haven't been able to figure out how to do that. Rmshane (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I just removed the image from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_L_Lewis because J.L. doesn't own the rights. I really appreciate your help; sorry to have bothered you. Rmshane (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Second Amendment neutrality
Looking at your involvement in the Good Article review of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution article, I think it is fair to guess that you were unaware of the various points of view on the topic missing from the article, and the neutrality bias problem in the article. May I suggest that the GA determination be reassessed as to whether the article meets neutrality policy? Thanks. SaltyBoatr (talk) 21:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * SaltyBoatr is well known for his disruptive POV tagline bombing of this very article while continuously disputing neutrality and not contributing to the article. See:  Wikipedia neutral point of view Noticeboard. Yaf (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If SaltyBoatr is correct, then Wikipedia's policy regarding neutrality needs to be revised. His logic would mean any article which is about any part of the Constitution would have to include interpretations clearly at odds with Supreme Court case law, no matter how out of the mainstream would be those interpretations. Tax protestors would have every right to have their belief that the Sixteenth Amendment was not legally adopted represented in the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution article; if it wasn't, they could place a POV tag on that article. The same would go for white supremacists regarding articles such as Brown v. Board of Education, Equal Protection Clause and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. SaltyBoatr's reasoning would destroy any legitimacy Wikipedia has regarding law articles. BTW, hi SaltyBoatr. SMP0328. (talk) 02:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * You are very welcome, keep up the good (and featured) work! Ruhrfisch <sub style="color:green;">&gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 16:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats. The GTCs are also successful. --Efe (talk) 06:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Congrats on your first* FA!
* Well, technically, you already had two before Maggie Gyllenhaal, but they were lists...eh, who really cares about the semantics?

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for November 2008
SoxBot II (talk) 03:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

New section
Right now, I haven't progressed on anything. Been trying to get Final Resolution (January 2008), Against All Odds (2008), and Destination X (2008) wrote. Hard Justice is under review. Bound for Glory will under go a peer review before being taken to FAC and right now there are three FACs. I'll wait till there is none or one that has been up for a while. About to finish my review of JD. So right now, I've progressed none. Will C  22:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * To tell you the truth I really do enjoy writing but not in the creepy way. English has always been my worst subject. I never understood what a sentence was in school. Home schooling help me figure out but I still had trouble. Writing ppv articles have in some way, made me understand it more and I'm better at English now. Plus this is practice because I've never really had to write a report of any kind. Don't worry, I take loads people will not take. In the end, I always get the impossible done. Will C  22:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * That's the main reason I write. Wrestling interest me so I have no problem with writing about it and I've always been a big fan of wrestling. Plus I really want to learn about TNA. I can't multi-task that great, but I can get alot of stuff done when I focus. Will C  23:23, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, I got an idea, would you like to work with me after you get JD to FA on an article that I feel should be GA or FA? Will C  00:19, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Well an important article: Total Nonstop Action Wrestling. Will C  00:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I was thinking fixing that one and then the WWE one. At least get them to GA. I'm not sure what is needed to fix it but I do notice a few things that should be removed and reworded. There should be enough sources since TNA loves to talk about its beginning. It is just an idea that we can do in a few months. Will C  20:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I can get the ratings and stuff. Thats easy. The format is going to be my problem. Will C  21:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I guess we'll work on it after we get JD to FA and I'm done with all the 2008 TNA ppvs. Will C  21:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Alright. Will C  21:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Yahoo
I believe you used Yahoo messanger before, can you log on - I have to ask/tell you something.  aye matthew  ✡ 22:45, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Coldplay articles
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that your hard work on Coldplay articles, particularly in regards to their singles, is greatly appreciated. If you ever need help with a page, you can list an article at WikiProject Alternative music/COTW. Also, if you need help gathering sources, you can ask me directly. WesleyDodds (talk) 10:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It really depends on if those extra bits at the end are officially parts of the song titles. If they are, they need to be capitalized. If they aren't, they don't. The easiest way to settle this is if you have physical copies of the singles, and go with how the titles are printed in the liner notes. WesleyDodds (talk) 03:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
 S imon K <font size="2.5"> S  K   18:43, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of WWF Light Heavyweight Champions
--SRX 01:22, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!
^^As above, and yes, I'm pretty ecstatic about Jeff's win! It's been a good day today! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 17:59, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and I know, I was delighted! I actually thought Edge was going to retian, and then Jeff would win the Rumble and then the title at "Mania, which would have been awesome. But, still I went to school dancing this morning! Fucking excellent! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm too happy to be annoyed that your "guy" won. btw, why is "guy" in italics, and not the "my" or "your"? Are you implying that they're not really guys? I agree about Cena, but not Jeff! :) ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 18:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, that would make sense. *smacks head off desk* Sorry, I'm a tiny bit dense today. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 19:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * True, true! ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 05:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

The Simpsons Game
Got time for a GAN review of The Simpsons Game? I think it's ready for FAC but I'd like to receive a second opinion first :) Gary King  ( talk ) 21:02, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, anything. I'm hoping to submit to FAC today as I think it meets the criteria :) Gary King  ( talk ) 21:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Awesome, I love that game (well, the series). Sure, I'll do it now. Gary King  ( talk ) 21:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

My friend
Your on my friends list on my user page could you go sign your name that would be a whole lot better, when you have a chance that is. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  16:39, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. <font face="Kristen ITC"> Hairy Perry  16:45, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas. Chubb enna  itor  17:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Judgment Day (2008)
I added comments to the PR.--SRX 17:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep. Use "kicked ___ in the head" instead.--SRX 00:12, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * How does Survivor Series (2007) look so far? --SRX 00:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope, just GA so the GA topic of 2007 WWE PPVs can be accomplished. I haven't had a GA in awhile anyways :) Maybe FA in the future.--SRX 00:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * as a result, the title became vacant. remove this. In addition, remember what I said about the "featured matches part".--SRX 00:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Say it was an inter-brand match.--SRX 01:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If you really follow the way I wrote Over the Edge (1999) and Survivor Series (2007), Judgment Day 2008 can become a FA.--SRX 01:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * And that's why I'm here to help :)--SRX 02:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

On a side note this is my first GA review, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, <font face="Arial"> Genius 101 Guestbook  00:29, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Congregation Beth Israel (Scottsdale, Arizona) GAR
Thank you for your thorough and helpful GA review of Congregation Beth Israel (Scottsdale, Arizona). Jayjg <small style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 02:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Pleas Check your inbox
 SteelersFan- 9  4  04:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiCup notice
The 2009 WikiCup will begin on January 1, 2009. The first round will run through March 31, 2009. For more information on this tournament, read the "about" section on the main WikiCup page.

This year, we have a different system in calculating points. At User:Garden/WikiCup/Submissions, you will find information about submitting your article (and other) work to earn points. Each contestant will have their own individual subpage for submitting completed work to us.

This year, User:ST47 will also be running one of his bots to calculate mainspace edits and read your submission subpages to calculate the point values you receive based on our scoring chart.

Questions or comment? Ask at the talk page or go directly to Garden or IMatthew's talk page. Good luck and Happy Holidays! --  aye matthew  ✡ and  Garden. 14:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

GA Review
I'd just like you to know that I saw your comments at Talk:Night of Champions (2008), and there are only a few things to do before I pass the article. Thanks, <font face="Arial"> Genius 101 Guestbook  22:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Christmas
Merry Christmas!-- Will C  07:23, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

List of WWF Light Heavyweight Champions
WOO! New FL :)SRX 22:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

GA Review: Shay Given
Hey, I hope you've had a good Christmas/holiday period! After your excellent review of Alan Shearer back in July, if you have the time, another footballer is up for review; not as decorated as Shearer, but in need of a reviewer nonetheless! Shay Given, if you have some spare time! Best, – Toon (talk)  17:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, just give me sometime and I'll get to the review. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Good article nomination
Can you review Survivor: Borneo (a current GAN) for me? I'd like to get started working on another season, but I'd like to get this one done first. Thanks,  aye matthew  @ 22:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, like I said above, just give me sometime and I'll get you the review. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Mark Speight
Hi, I noticed you failed the above article becaues there'd been no activity on the article since your review. how Do You Turn This On/Amicon retired from wikipedia before your review, so that's why no changes have been made. Since the comments you made seemed to be pretty minor I thought I'd see if I could deal with them. My responses are on the talk page. I know it's unconventional since you just failed the article, but I was wondering if you could reopen the review for a couple of days while I see if I can improve it. It would save having to go through the GAC process all over again and another reviewer having to familiarise themselves with the article. Cheers, Nev1 (talk) 22:57, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much ThinkBlue :-) Happy editing, Nev1 (talk) 23:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Kirsten Dunst
Alrighty, I put in my two cents at PR. Good luck at FAC! Ink Runner (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiCup

 * Delivered by <font face="Trebuchet MS"> neuro  (talk) for  Garden  and  aye  matthew  at 20:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

 * Your words are up to my "fancy" standards :P <font face="Trebuchet MS">&mdash; neuro  (talk)  20:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Night of Champions (2008)
I just wanted you to know that I've passed Night of Champions (2008) as a Good Article. Sorry for being so picky in the review! Thanks, <font face="Arial"> Genius 101 Guestbook  01:28, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, you were doing your job as a GA reviewer, its very understandable. ;) Happy New Year. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:gold; background-color:#FFFFCC; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

has given you a bottle of Cristal! Cristal costs $350, and hopefully this bottle has made your New Year's Day better. Spread the spirit of the New Year by giving a bottle of Cristal to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Give a bottle of Cristal to someone else by adding to their talk page with a friendly... wait... PS: the Blazers will beat the Lakers the next time they play. Just you wait! T he C hronic  08:26, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Happy New Year to you too. But, the Lakers will smoke out the Blazers, and I'll bet you that will happen. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Happy New Year!-- Will C  23:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Belated Merry Christmas Blue and Happy New Year! --Efe (talk) 00:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, been thinking about it lately. But we are in trouble with "Viva la Vida". --Efe (talk) 01:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The reviewers were asking more than GA criteria required, and the fact that the article was passed to GAN prematurely, it will be a damn hard work.... Lost!? Oh yeah. It caught my attention yesterday. And the fact that I love its drums. Hehe. --Efe (talk) 01:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * They're two now. Another user looked into the POVish nature of the chart performance section, citing those words like "successful", etc. I haven't heard "Lovers in Japan". Blue, don't you know that I have heard only four Coldplay songs? First was "Violet Hill" on TV, and then "Viva la Vida", both once. Then "Yellow" on youtube, long after the article was promoted to GA, then "Lost!", many times. Hehe. --Efe (talk) 06:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh my, "Clocks", too. The first reviewer failed the GA. --Efe (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I suggest working on the article early in February. Its Grammy season and MTV will be publishing news articles for each Record of the Year nominee. Its going to be helpful specially that the background section of "Viva" is weak. --Efe (talk) 02:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * What do you mean afterward? --Efe (talk) 01:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * IDK, too. Do you have any idea what is our next GTC, aside from Viva? --Efe (talk) 08:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Limited sources, too, unless we have offline references. You have a copy of their book? It would be good. Ah, why don't we go for "Yellow"? --Efe (talk) 08:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Ireland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008 GAR
Hi ThinkBlue, I've opened a reassessment on Ireland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008 as I feel there should be greater encyclopedic information (broad coverage) within the article. I don't think it would take much work to bring it up to scratch as all the information is already out there, some of it in place on Wikipedia. But it would be worth people doing the work as the article is used as an example of a "Foo in the Eurovision Song Contest YEAR" Good Article, and it would be worth giving people something reasonably comprehensive and worthwhile to work toward.  SilkTork  *YES! 13:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for December 2008
SoxBot II (talk) 17:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Look who's back..
--Truco 04:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't worry partner, I got your back. And yes, Truco has come back to Wikipedia.--Truco 04:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)--Truco 04:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you want to convert the list List of ECW Tag Team Champions similar to the one at List of WCW World Tag Team Champions?--Truco 16:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * That's cool with me, in that way we can submit it for the wikicup thing too.--Truco 18:24, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It already started, it began January 1st.--Truco 18:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It's right here :D--Truco 19:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I'm stumped, I can't really get anything from it. No offense, but it was one of those boring WWE events, in which WWE didn't plan anything good IMO. Try something with Mick Foley and his Mankind gimmick or something the title changes, thats what GCF does with most of his DYK's.--Truco 22:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Did you get a good tagline? Are you able to complete the tag title list?--Truco 19:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Passing through...
Hello, saw you were reviewing the Daredevil film and I put it up for nom I couldn't help but see what else you've done and I have to say... I'm very impressed. I like your work, and impressed by your userpage look and name thing you've got going haha. Anyway. I'm not here to bug you about the review, just thought I'd randomly drop by, network a bit and tell you I admire what you've done. Keep it up! Excited to see your thoughts on the article =)

P.S. HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!

-- Harish (Talk) - 23:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Haha well I appreciate the offer to use your design but I'm a firm believer in developing your own style. Lol no don't rush it, take the time you need. Just glad its in capable hands. Do most people who nom usually just say hi? It's my first nom, I'm just going with the flow here. And thanks for the article compliment but it's an effort by all who have edited. Besides, look how many you've put up and given good quality. I mean, you've got so many GA's on your user page people probably think you're from Georgia ;) -- Harish (Talk) - 00:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Haha, and a jiffy it was! Very nicely done - can't wait to get back to work on the article. Haha y'know, it feels a shade exciting knowing you've put so much effort towards getting an article up to scratch - ultimate geekery? Haha. Ooooo I'd love to do collaborative work especially with such an experienced editor. How about you tell me your interests so we see what we can do between us? :) I see you're quite into wrasslin' - I used to love it up until a few years back - maybe I could still be of help there. Nevada girl ey? I'm a English lad myself. -- Harish (Talk) - 17:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * No worries about the delay, I wouldn't have noticed if it was up yesterday or not anyway! Yeah, that's how I felt about the Daredevil article. Haha yes, you can't be English and not know Coldplay lol. They're pretty cool - are they your favourite? [In music] I've mainly worked on rap articles because there was a time where I was hooked to it. I figure these days I can use that knowledge from over the years to some good use now. Shady Records has been my biggest effort in that field. Practically did it all. Never nominated it though. Yeah I saw your work on Maggie - impressive job! Very dedicated effort - what got you so motivated? My interests are generally films (and yes I would love to collaborate with ya on that field) but I'm into all sortsa music, love active stuff mainly though like biking, paintballing, swimming, go-karting - y'know, typical guy activities. I was heavily into sports before my knee injury. Loved soccer and basketball. But it's all nothing that I could work on over here. Oo, d'ya come to London much? I live just half an hour North of it =) I'd live to check out the Nevada, it's on my to-see list, under West Coast tour! -- Harish (Talk) - 19:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Haha yeah we're even, but I feel you should still owe me =P I'd agree that Coldplay are great, but I'd have to research before agreeing that they're the greatest out! Thanks for the recording label encouragement, Blue =) ...is there another name you prefer to go by? Ooo a Maggie fan eh? Interesting. I consider her one of the better actresses out there, so it's good that she gets her due on here! Oo, I see. I was going to work on the Fantastic Four film next (it's hard to find films I greatly enjoy which need work that I can do... so it's the lesser maintained superheroes I'm tackling haha), but if you're not into it we can do something else? A good way to work is find DVDs you have with plenty of production information, whose corresponding articles are rubbish (a free films article tip for ya!) Oooo cool and fun sports - do you play them all often? You don't happen to be a part-time Cali beach Volley ball chick during the summer, do ya? Sorry, it's a stereotype haha. Well if all people are as sweet as you out there then hell, bring on the Vegas baby! I've always heard good things about it there, I assume that's where you live? I'm in the lively streets of Luton, which is lovely for all four sunny weeks during the summer! -- Harish (Talk) - 22:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh you'll know what you owe when the time is right haha. Oh I see, and there's me thinking I was just a lil more than a "co-worker" haha. FYI Harish is my real name. Interesting pair of actors - what would you do if you had such an opportunity to meet them? Ooo Ocean's Twelve eh? I'm s lil surprised but not too much. Not all films have good coverage. For example, I have the Ace Ventura DVDs (off the top of my head) and they have no additional features whatsoever. Just usually it's a good place. Haha, heck yeah I'm gonna rock out in LV! And should you come through my town, I'mma show you around and escort you right back out to somewhere you'd really enjoy yourself, because it's a bit small on the offerings here. Still gotta love my town though. You're a cool person, Blue. And you're not a blonde = even better. And you're a good conversationalist. You're quite intriguing y'know, I dunno why but I just feel to talk and talk to ya =) By the way - I do apologise for these longish and constant replies. I know it can be quite an inconvenience to most people. -- Harish (Talk) - 22:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME MY FIRST GA!!!!!! =D Oh man, how exciting! Uh... I'd like to start by thanking GOD... my parents, who are sitting at home watching reading this! Special thanks to Blue for making it happen!! My friends for their support! I'd also like to thank Father Time for giving me that spare time, and Mother Nature for making it cold enough to give me every reason not go out. Thank you so much, it's... it's beautiful =')

But seriously, thanks Blue! I also appreciate the few final date clean ups you did to it! Sorry I didn't reply earlier - assignment and exam hell began the week just gone, and I have two more of those weeks left. Hahah, I like that - taking pics of Brad Pitt and Maggie would be a GREAT idea, AND... what a sign of a true Wikipedien to do so lol. Oh sweet, I appreciate the tour guide offer I'll call that chip in with due time ;) Actually I was thinking about you a couple of days back and was thinking if you wanna collaborate then an interesting way to do so could be for you to suggest an article you want to work on as well as one I want to, and we just keep working with each other on the two articles. I dunno how you feel about that method but I'll be interested in your response. Hope all's been well you've been taking caaare! -- Harish (Talk) - 12:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Friend
What are the above for? Just telling the truth.-- Will C  00:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, close though. I started on it in May. Set my sights on FA in August or late July.-- Will C  00:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Hopefully Bound for Glory IV will not be as hard.-- Will C  01:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, hopefully Bound for Glory IV will be very good. I'm going to do something different with it. Add a history section explaining what the event is. I'm looking at the films project's FAs and Video game project's FAs to get better reception and production ideas. I'm trying to get it to be the best FA the project will have. So, when are you taking Judgement Day to FAC?-- Will C  20:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * This one.-- Will C  21:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Well I was going to read it again and then the shit hit the fan and I'm now busy again. I'll do a copyedit on it and read it again soon. Maybe then you'll be sure it is ready, I probably will.-- Will C  21:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'll probably review JD before I work on BFG. I have many things to do to other things I'm working on before it. Mainly everything you see here. I'm up to Against All Odds 05.-- Will C  22:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Here is Bound for Glory IV's subpage. I have alot to do to it. Plus I have to write the backgrounds and aftermaths from Against All Odds (2005) to No Surrender (2008) (though I'm just going to work on it than re-write it) before I'll start on BFG. BFG is a future project. When I get what work I have in real-life done this week I'll work on JD and probably by next week you will have it at FAC. I told you I would help you and I'm a man of my word.-- Will C  00:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm just saying. No telling when it will be at FAC. BFG's event does not get released until tomorrow. It is going to go under a peer review first anyway. My main project is fixing my shitty life so I'm postponing most of the articles I'm writting anyway. No bother at all. I was expecting probably something like that. Kristen Dunst was made an A-class article by you, so I kind of expected you to take it to FAC. I believe the wrestling project should have the A class, plus the template class and most of the classes the video games project has.-- Will C  01:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah I was apart of the discussion. It seemed no one had a problem with it but there was not enough people willing to review the articles. We once had the class, I wonder why we stopped using it.-- Will C  18:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Perhaps we should open up a new discussion on it. I'm pretty sure it would help us in the end.-- Will C  19:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Come on, everyone knows you, they wouldn't have a problem with you just showing up out of the blue. It is in your name, ThinkBlue. Though it is talking about SD, but you've done alot for the project so no one should have a problem with you not saying nothing and then coming back. You have the right and if anyone has a problem than it is their's and you shouldn't care what people think of you.-- Will C  19:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, what other articles are you working on besides Dunst and JD 08?-- Will C  01:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Advice? The only advice I remember that had anything to do with Taboo Tuesday was to work on all of them and take them all to GA. Then make yourself a Good Topic. Yeah I was looking through your archives trying to find the first time I said anything to you and I saw something about Vengeance. I was expecting that to be your first and was going to ask why you did not take it to GAN. I must have forgot. I have faith you can get HBK's article to FA. It will take alot of work but I believe you can do it. Having practice with three other articles will help. Plus you'll be able to brag you got four bio articles to FA.-- Will C  18:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, what about Night of Champions? You've been on here for three years? Damn, I feel young. Hey, you'll probably have better luck with HBK than I will with A.J. Styles and Samoa Joe in the near future. If you need any help with any of them let me know.-- Will C  02:02, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Well you are 2 and a half and I'll be 1 tomorrow. I plan on taking them both to GA and then FA. I'm trying to make the TNA stuff more important. I got the first FA and GA over there. People are starting to notice it more. Two more FAs over there will help. You can't bother me. I'm glad just to talk to someone who isn't insane.-- Will C  17:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Well as I see it, no one was working on the TNA stuff besides three or four. They were LAX, TJ, DMN, and Skyes. LAX had two or three in the works. He never got past the background though. With no one really making any ground, I got tired of seeing the TNA stuff just become a bigger list of articles needing improving, while the WWE stuff was being taken to GA and FA. I thought to take it under my own power and try to fix the TNA stuff. I'm currently working on all of their articles. Hopefully by February they are all done. It would be nice to see everyone of them GA, besides a few that will be FA. I think it would be funny. Seeing all 54 out of 60 TNA PPVs GA and FA, while the WWE stuff is yet to have that many done. In a years time, going from nothing expanded but barely two, to all expanded but six future articles. I would laugh. As long as you aren't running around like an idiot trying to be an ass or just a retard, you aren't insane to me. Well it has been a year, I've gotten four articles to GA and one FA.-- Will C  01:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

It's been a while...
It truly has! Hope your New Year was pleasurable, and its also been a while since I gave you a GAN to review. Would you mind reviewing Mount Redoubt (Alaska)? Best, ₪<font face="Gill Sans MT">Ceran →(cheer→chime →carol) 21:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * User:LordSunday=me. ;) And sure, that'll be alright. ₪<font face="Gill Sans MT">Ceran →(cheer→chime →carol) 21:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, are you online? I can't find (excuse me for violating the note up there, but) any more dates for the eruptions. I don't think they're well-enough documented. ₪<font face="Gill Sans MT">Ceran →(slip→sled →snow) 01:31, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Heath Ledger
The info was properly sourced, and a quick search revealed the tattoo stuff to be true (and pretty widely reported). What's the confusion? Tool2Die4 (talk) 23:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

A note from the GACC

 * Notice delivery by xenobot  13:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

List?
I guess you didn't have time to get around the ECW Tag Title list? In addition, I recommend getting an archival bot for your talk page.--Truco 02:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh that sucks, I would have given you a tagline, but I couldn't get one for that pay-per-view. Its okay, take your time, no rush for it. Also, you can set the archival time to how many days you like, up to 30 :P--Truco 21:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Haha. How about something with DX, Did You Know that after a (whatever # of years) hiatus, professional wrestling stable D-Generation X officially reunited at Vengeance (2006)?--Truco 22:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * What you mean fixed? Like placed in OOU? If you significantly expanded it like added 5x the content that was there, which would qualify it for 5x Expansion.--Truco 22:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I know, but you said you fixed it up these past few days, and I said if it was expanded 5x its original size during the fixing then yes. But if it was 3 years ago, then no.--Truco 22:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * (outdent)Oh, then I don't think it can qualify for a DYK, sorry. You like the new newsletter design? :P--Truco 23:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Truco 23:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * So I'm guessing you still haven't had time"? :)-- Tru co  00:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, its cool. I'll just do it myself.-- Tru co  00:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Its okay, when you have time, we can work on another together.-- Tru co  00:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, it depends, when are you free to do it?-- Tru co  01:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

John Cena
Dear ThinkBlue,

In response to edit of John Cena's finishing move, The STFU, I changed the move to STF as this is what its now being referred to by the WWE. I did not leave a source last time which meant that you believed that my edit counted as vandalism.

Here is my source to back up the John Cena move name change:

http://www.pwinsider.com/ViewArticle.php?id=35764&p=1

Thanks, Sean Dyer

P.S. Please Relpy
 * ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by SJDyer (talk • contribs) 22:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter

 * Delivered by The  Helpful  One  for  Garden  and  iMatthew  at 23:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Note
This editor is starting to become an issue. He inserts non-free use images and continues to force image size in infoboxes despite my having explained it. Just a heads-up. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I didn't think anything about our earlier discussions. It wasn't so much!! I just finished and took List of No Country for Old Men awards and nominations to featured list and was so happy, it was my first featured anything. I might be tempted to work on something, depending on what that is. I see you working on Liv Tyler, she's on my watchlist. Let me know and we'll see! Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Another one...
I actually was fast this time ;)&mdash;could you review Glacier Peak? It'll almost complete my quest for a good topic. Ceran <font color="#000080">→ → 22:51, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ping. Ceran <font color="#000080">→ //forge 23:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Re-ping. Ceran <font color="#000080">→ //forge 00:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)