User talk:ThinkSmarterToday

Eric Reguly
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Eric Reguly. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 23:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your edits to Eric Reguly no not have an encyclopedic wp:tone and simply appear to be an attack on Eric Reguly. Please discuss it in talk:Eric Reguly before restoring the content. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 23:02, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It's your assessment that is the problem: See wp:undue wp:tone. It does not matter whether you think you are right or not, it is only that you have undone other's edit more than three times in 24 hours.  You will be reported to ANI/3RR which is likely to result in a block. Jim1138 (talk) 23:12, 5 August 2012 (UTC)