User talk:ThinkTank2000

A tag has been placed on Andrew Shupe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  W ODU P  22:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Hoaxes
Please don't create hoax articles. That is a sure way to get blocked from editing. Corvus cornix 23:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Repeatedly editing the article is just wasting your time. You aren't going to find any sources, since it's a hoax, and it's going to get deleted. You'll need to provide ISBN numbers for those sources, and since they don't exist, or else if they do exist don't really mention these people, it's just wasting everybody's time. Just admit you're creating hoax articles and we can all move on. Corvus cornix 23:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I didn't know we needed the ISBN, I would've gotten it if you had given me more time, I'm still learning the system. But whatever, if you want to deny this man a place in history go ahead. I hope you can rest your head lightly on your pillow of pretentiousness.
 * I think I will, thank you. My pillow of pretentiousness is very comfortable.  Corvus cornix 23:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Alright, you win, but only because you have a sense of humor.

A tag has been placed on Justin Lookadoo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pilotboi / talk / contribs 02:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Hoaxes (again)
I see that you are trying to hangon to Justin Lookadoo. I can clearly see that you have a history of creating hoaxes, so don't even try to explain why we should keep this. If you continue to create hoaxes and other vandalism, you will be blocked. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 02:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

You're right. I do have a history of Hoaxes. Well played, Pilotboi, well played. But at least mine are inherently hilarious. By the way, Justin Lookadoo is a real person, and everything I wrote was true, just not cited. With a great amount of sincerity, ThinkTank2000.


 * Yes, hilarious, but not the proper place for humor. And my mistake if it is real, but I read something about "it was discovered that he was actually dead" and then "he lives with his family". If you find some reliable sources, maybe it can become a more useful article. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 04:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps I'll write the real article at some point. There really is a motivational speaker called Justin Lookadoo, and he really does have connections to Exodus International (a group that believes in curing gays). As for the collagen and duct tape comments, I can not completely confirm, but having seen him in person, it would take a mighty hand to disprove my theory. Perhaps lives with his family was incorrect considering the content, perhaps "His family lives with him, or what is left." would be more suitable? I'll find reliable sources, and then you'll be forced to eat your words, kind sir. I bid you a good night. ThinkTank2000.


 * LOL, okay. You can believe what you want, but just remember you can't put original research on Wikipedia. As for eating my words...no thanks, I just ate. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 05:45, 20 September 2007 (UTC)