User talk:Thinking Stone

Link deletion
There was no article to the links for EZDrummer and Drumkit from Hell, that is why they were deleted. Thank you, Burningclean &#91; Speak the truth! &#93; 22:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC) Thank you, Burningclean &#91; Speak the truth! &#93; 04:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC) Thank you, Burningclean &#91; Speak the truth! &#93; 05:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC) Thank you, Burningclean &#91; Speak the truth! &#93; 05:18, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It is not against Wikipedia's "etiquette", it looks sloppy, and do you ever see a decent Featured or Good article with it. I'm glad you created an article for it, that is awesome, but red links nearly always get removed. You would be surprised how many times somebody has add dead links to those articles. By the way if you don't source Ezdrummer it will probably get deleted.
 * Wow dude, calm down. I reverted once, show me where it says that deleting a red link is against guidlines. Here is one you should look at, WP:CIVIL.
 * My apologies for not using an edit summary, but that has nothing to do with the rules of deleting a dead link. As another note, you should always revert something that looks like vandalism, that looked like vandalism to me, considering how many times that link has been added.

Again, I know it is stupid but some people register just to access certain pages and get blocked right away. Whay don't you create the article then add a link, that is always what I do. Thank you, Burningclean &#91; Speak the truth! &#93; 00:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Ezdrummer
I guess those help it to just scrape through, though it needs more third-party reliable sources. :)  Corvus cornix  talk  16:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Drumkit from Hell
A tag has been placed on Drumkit from Hell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  [ t &#183; c ] 04:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of EZdrummer
A tag has been placed on EZdrummer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. &mdash; TheBilly(Talk) 23:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikimedia Stories Project
Aloha Thinking Stone!

My name is Victor and I work with the Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that supports Wikipedia. We're chronicling the inspiring stories of the Wikipedia community around the world, including those from readers, editors, and donors. Stories are absolutely essential for any non-profit to persuade new people to support the cause, and we know the vast network of people who use Wikipedia have so much to share.

I find stories that drive our annual fundraising efforts. It's important to convey the incredible diversity of people who've come to rely upon Wikipedia every day.

I'd really like the opportunity to interview you to tell your story, with the possibility of using it in our materials, on our community websites, or as part of this year’s fundraiser to encourage others to support Wikipedia.

I will be in Buenos Aires from the 10th - 11th of March 2012.

I'm hoping you will elaborate on your story with me. Please let me know if you're inclined to take part in the Wikipedia Stories Project!

Thank you,

Victor Grigas

user:Victorgrigas

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Victor Grigas (talk) 17:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Drumkit from Hell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drumkit from Hell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Drumkit from Hell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:59, 4 March 2015 (UTC)