User talk:Thirdeyevision

Regarding your edit to E.g. bailey:
Your recent edit to E.g. bailey (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a shared IP address to add email addresses, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, or forum links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 08:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

re Speakeasy Records
You've placed a hangon tag on this article, but haven't yet posted on the talk page of the article indicating why you think this entity is sufficiently notable. See WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP, and WP:MUSIC for guidelins. Herostratus 17:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

re Find Talk Page on Adminstrator's page
Herostratus wrote "If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page..." However, I went to his page but couldn't find where to send him a talk page message. Please advise.
 * Any editor may be reached at User talk:Username; Herostratus, then, may be reached at User talk:Herostratus (I'll alert him to your helpme query in order that, should he not hear from you, you might nevertheless communicate with him here. If ever you have difficulty reaching a user's talk page, you may also navigate to his userpage (even where such page is a red link) and then click on the talk tab directly to the right of the user page tab.  I gather that you may want to write Herostratus apropos of Speakeasy Records, about the proposed speedy deletion of which he writes supra, and I should note that, should you wish to explain your application of the hangon tag, you might reach the article's talk page here.  Feel free to drop me a line at my talk page should you have any further questions. :) Joe 17:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, you can just type here and I will watch here for your comments. Actually there is no "talk" tab on my user page, it is labeled "discussion" but that is the same thing. Then click on the "+" tab and it will open a window for you to write your message. (Also, as far as getting to my page, just click my name at the end of this message.) Cheers, Herostratus 18:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks Hero. I left a message on your talk page from the info that Joe left above. Also HighInBC left a message on the Speakeasy Records talk page about why it might have gotten flagged, because of the Myspace link. I mentioned to him that I didnt realize that Myspace links arent considered reliable sources. I will be sure to find other sources and outside links in the future. My apologies, still learning about Wiki.  Thanks again.--Thirdeyevision 18:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Reply
Hi Third, sorry to be late in getting back to you. Actually when you get right down to it, I'm not sure what to say other than what's in the generic welcome message, but I'd be glad to answer specific questions.

Re Speakeasy: we get a lot of articles on bands, and also record labels. Everybody wants an article about his cousin's garage band, and we have to reject a fair number of these per WP:MUSIC. Also labels - the entry cost for creating a label is lower now that when you needed a vinyl pressing machine etc. So we are quite wary of articles about labels, also. WP:NOTABILITY contains our basic notability requirements and WP:MUSIC our more specific requirements for music entities (granted that spoken word is not music, record labels are generally lumped in there. I haven't really looked at Speakeasy, but I can see that it's not exactly Capitol Records. Anyway, even if it is notable, it is liable to be flagged simply because we are so wary of record labels. If this happens, message me and I'll see what I can do. Herostratus 02:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of E. g. bailey


The article E. g. bailey has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article does not establish notability of the subject.Article does not cite any reliable sources and may not meet the general notability guideline for inclusion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Moorsmur (talk) 13:33, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MN Spoken Word Association


The article MN Spoken Word Association has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable organization.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Moorsmur (talk) 00:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Speakeasy Records


The article Speakeasy Records has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable record label.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Moorsmur (talk) 00:19, 13 August 2010 (UTC)