User talk:Thirdoffer23

Loyola2L
As a journalist, I am sympathetic to the issue of reporting grievances, but Wikipedia is generally not the place to advance these issues, as we are an encyclopedia, not a news site. Republishing unreliably sourced and anonymous criticism introduces fairness problems and (irony alert) potential legal issues. If Loyola2L's specific criticisms of Loyola Law School become a matter of debate beyond the blogosphere and become reported on and analyzed in independent media, I would support placement of them in the encyclopedia article.

However, checking the Google news search, I would suggest that there may be enough reliable sources to create an article or a section of Legal education in the United States discussing the growing trend of law students having trouble finding jobs. Loyola2L appears to be notable within this issue of interest, and its community could be mentioned in this broader context, as it was in the WSJ article. FCYTravis 06:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Warning
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. --ElKevbo 12:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
My suspicion is that you, Brickexistab and uponsolid133 are either working in concert or the same editor. Consequently all 3 accounts have been blocked as suspected sockpuppets. Spartaz Humbug! 19:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)