User talk:This is sooooo tough

March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that many of your recent contributions appear to be disructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Please stop adding links to very common terms, countries, occupations, units of measurements, etc per WP:OVERLINK. Thanks!'' Evaders99 (talk) 21:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I will never do that again. This is sooooo tough (talk) 09:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, it is the 'year' and 'simple maths' that everyone knows. Do not block this unless I do that again. I know that is destructive. I have not read the rules. Sorry, I just don't understand how this work. I am only targeting 31,621 edits. Please don't stop me. I will never do that again. Please tell me where is the vandilism, I cannot find it. Now, I will remove the bad things. I will correct myself. I am not even 0.5% to the target... Everyone knows what is a day or a child. Unblock me please, robot. I don't want to buy a new device. I cannot even make a new account. It is only a mistake. Thanks for reminding that. (talk) 09:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Why do you bots revert all of the edits? Even I have not done wrong in all 100 of them!? 09:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)(talk)

I have waited for 761 minutes for a reply! Why is this take so long for autopatrolling robots to reach but the disructive content only tooks 15 minutes for a random robots to be found? You spent 50 times more minutes and you still cannot find it? [Some users waited 63,154 minutes, which is 4,210 times more minutes!!]   10:59, 5 March 2022 (UTC)(talk)

'Please stop adding links to very common terms, countries, occupations, units of measurements, etc per WP:OVERLINK.' I can't. You told me but it's pointless. This is sooooo tough (talk) 11:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Ok, just give me a time of expire. 12,000 minutes? This is sooooo tough (talk) 11:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

15,000 minutes? This is sooooo tough (talk) 11:06, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

18,063 minutes? This is sooooo tough (talk) 11:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Maybe in 21,197 minutes? This is sooooo tough (talk) 11:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

24,435 minutes? This is sooooo tough (talk) 11:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

27,823 minutes?? This is sooooo tough (talk) 11:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Unlock in 31,104 minutes?? Please... Please deal... This is sooooo tough (talk) 11:09, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. 331dot (talk) 11:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC) I cannot close this checkuser block, but I have removed talk page access. 331dot (talk) 11:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You can definitely decline a checkuser block, you just can't reduce or undo one without consulting a CU (per WP:CUBL).-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks; I've been previously advised (might be in my archives somewhere) to tread very carefully even with a decline of a CU. 331dot (talk) 21:59, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries if it's outside of your comfort level, but there is nothing in policy stating you can't decline an appeal of a CU block if you feel the block is appropriate given the evidence you have access to.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:05, 7 March 2022 (UTC)