User talk:Thiscrund68

Please discuss on the talk page
Your recent edits to this article have been challenged by numerous Wikipedians over the past few days due to their poor sourcing and blatant disregard for consensus despite it having been explained in length on the talk page of the article. Please discuss it some more before making these changes or this will have to go to WP:ANI. Thanks,  Dr Strauss   talk   21:08, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Genital modification and mutilation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

SOAP
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Circumcision for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions. Jytdog (talk) 22:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

You don't seem to understand that one of the reasons you were blocked is because you were repeatedly misusing the talk page. You were using the talk page as a soapbox platform to air your views. You should know that Wikipedia is never to be used as a forum for discussing a topic, and that's what you did, repeatedly ignoring the warnings you received at the top of this section. Basically, you were not here to build an encyclopedia. Convince us that you are, and you can be unblocked.... but I agree with the admins above that you must agree not to participate on the circumcision talk page as a condition for being unblocked. Disruption such as you have engaged in is unwelcome on Wikipedia. There are other venues where you can engage in that activity. Wikipedia isn't one of them. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Second chance with topic ban offered
Following a lengthy discussion with Thiscrund68 in the #wikipedia-en-unblock IRC channel I have re-established talk page access. They said they would be OK with an indefinite topic ban from circumcision, widely construed (that includes not just articles but also, for example, talk page discussions about circumcision or circumcision-related content in articles whose topic is not circumcision); if they confirm that here on the talk page, I will unblock the account. Huon (talk) 00:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Do not EVER refactor other users comments as you did here. That sort of behaviour is absolutely unacceptable, and if I had not already declined one unblock appeal from this account I would have immediately declined this one out of hand, purely for that edit. Yunshui 雲 水 08:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * In fact, given that you would pull a stunt like that (deliberately refactoring an admin's comment to make it appear that they had agreed you didn't need a topic ban, when in fact they had offered you an unblock specifically on that condition) I have removed your talkpage access again. You clearly have no positive contributions to make to a communal project such as Wikipedia. Yunshui 雲 水 09:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * For the record, I received an email from Thiscrund68 where they state they agree with the topic ban. They said so before and then pulled the stunt documented above. I see no reason to trust them a second time. Huon (talk) 22:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 04:30, 20 October 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 18:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Nihlus 01:46, 24 October 2017 (UTC)