User talk:Thmazing/Archive 2021.02.22

Orphaned non-free media (File:Its-man.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Its-man.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

About Grégory Levasseur
Hi Thmazing. Yep, I completely borked up the article in this edit. Currently trying to fix it up. I would most appreciate your help in repairing the damage.--Shirt58 (talk) 11:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sterling Van Wagenen


The article Sterling Van Wagenen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dog six (talk) 23:10, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Giants-in-the-Earth.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Giants-in-the-Earth.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Julie Shea for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julie Shea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Julie Shea until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wesley Frazier


A tag has been placed on Wesley Frazier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Qwerty Binary (talk) 17:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of San Francisco Spiders (hockey).png
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo of San Francisco Spiders (hockey).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Malpass93! (what I've been up to/drop me a ___) 15:25, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sam Hogin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Cook (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Kate Kinsella for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kate Kinsella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kate Kinsella until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:28, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Betty Swords, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BFA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Paul Vorst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Redirects

 * 1) REDIRECT, #redirect, and #Redirect all work, FYI! —Largo Plazo (talk) 05:19, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks much
Thank you for your linking help at List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!, much appreciated, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 19:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You're most welcome! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 06:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Writers Guild of America Awards 2010, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Whitney Awards
I noticed that you've made quite a few edits to Whitney Awards. On looking at the page I thought that a change to the Winners and finalists section might make the page look a bit better. If you would like to see my proposed change it's here. If this is acceptable I think the size of the table of contents could be reduced by not having a separate section for each year as you can see by my new section heading. I would be interested in your comments. Jodosma (talk) 12:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Got your post. I'll do that right now. Thanks Ciao Jodosma (talk) 09:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Duncan Jepson
Hi, I'm Mabalu. Thmazing, thanks for creating Duncan Jepson!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider expanding this article to show the subject's notability

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mabalu (talk) 01:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=624115702 your edit] to Jepson (surname) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:42, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * * Raymond Jepson'', lead architect for Ford Motor Company and Chief Architect and Engineer for the

Speedy deletion nomination of Carlos Valdez (actor)


A tag has been placed on Carlos Valdez (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:29, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=643440221 your edit] to Page 3 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * been imitated in Britain's other []Tabloid_(newspaper_format)#Red_top_tabloids|'red top' tabloids and by newspapers internationally.
 * {cite web|last=Cunningham|first=Melissa|title=Tweet - Birthday tomorrow :D too bad I have to work : (|url=https://twitter.com/LissyC5/status/330783217361752064|publisher=Twitter - @LissyC5|accessdate=

Disambiguation link notification for February 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tehachapi, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Maltese Falcon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Edmund Vance Cooke
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Edmund Vance Cooke, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.poemspoet.com/edmund-vance-cooke.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * No trouble at all - hope I didn't undercut you. I did want to at least remove the tag before things went any further. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You're fine. I suspect the bot saw the list of works and flagged that - I've seen it do so a few times. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Venkat Srinivasan


The article Venkat Srinivasan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable academic. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bruce Harter


A tag has been placed on Bruce Harter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.contracostatimes.com/search/ci_5892450. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hirolovesswords (talk) 01:01, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


 * After existing for years, this article was deleted within an hour of this notice being posted. I have no way to debate the proposition or consider its worthiness. Thmazing (talk) 21:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Niekro brothers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niekro brothers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Niekro brothers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Wesley Frazier for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wesley Frazier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wesley Frazier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Please note that I did not nominate the article for deletion, but I noticed that you had not been notified as a courtesy. — Jkudlick t c s 09:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Libana article
I'm a bit concerned about this article, sorry.

I can find no evidence through online searching that this person exists besides that Ms. Chicago (an artist, not a historian of Islamic Spain) has mentioned her. No books, no translations of her works, nothing. I'm very prepared to believe that I'm wrong about this (I don't speak Arabic or Spanish, and I'm not an expert on history) but honestly I have no evidence right now that Ms. Chicago didn't just make her up from whole cloth, and that concerns me. (I've read her book on Google Books, which has no citation. )

Do you have any evidence that this person is real? Blythwood (talk) 07:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Libana
Hello, Thmazing,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Libana should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Libana.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Blythwood (talk) 08:22, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonna Pirinen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hello Dolly!. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kateřina Šedá


A tag has been placed on Kateřina Šedá requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ethanlu121 (talk) 02:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Woodbine (cigarette), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alun Lewis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Günther Becker
Hello Thmazing,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Günther Becker for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 08:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oskar Blarr


The article Oskar Blarr has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * insufficient evidence for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 04:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Mormonism in comics page
Hi, I'm BYU's coordinator of Wikipedia initiatives. I'm working on a Mormonism and comics page in one of my sandboxes. I'm planning to add more information from the special Sunstone comics issue and from the Harold B. Lee library exhibit page when it goes live. If you have any suggestions for sources, content, etc. I'm open to them! Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 20:36, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Now and Then Show


The article The Now and Then Show has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Public-access television show with no indication of notability per WP:GNG. I can find nothing about it online apart from uploads to YouTube.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Little Will (talk) 08:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 17 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * On the Debbi Fields page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=760574262 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F760574262%7CDebbi Fields%5D%5D Ask for help])

February 2017
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Karate Kid, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of American Forts Network


The article American Forts Network has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Jackson Crawford) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Jackson Crawford, Thmazing!

Wikipedia editor SMcCandlish just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The subject may (marginally) be notable, but the article lacks any independent, reliable sources, so it is a likely candidate for deletion."

To reply, leave a comment on SMcCandlish's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clustermunch


The article Clustermunch has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:NEO, WP:NOTADICTIONARY"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leon Gordon (painter)
Hello, Thmazing. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Leon Gordon (painter), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Leon Gordon (painter) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

 Dr Strauss   talk   21:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Swat. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should: Thank you. TJRC (talk) 01:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
 * Only add a " red link " if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references

Nomination of Leon Gordon (painter) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leon Gordon (painter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Leon Gordon (painter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Military Material Identification Division) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Military Material Identification Division, Thmazing!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please check the formatting error with the referenced source. For more information please see WP:CITE."

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zippy-script


The article Zippy-script has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No secondary sources, and it's unclear what the article subject was. Was it a physical device, a computer program, or an approach used by a human?"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 20:18, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fice dog


A tag has been placed on Fice dog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 05:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kialo
Hello, Thmazing. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kialo, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Campbell Grant
Hi. I've moved your article to Draft:Campbell Grant because it's not ready for the encyclopedia yet - no references, no categories, no real suggestion of notability. I would suggest you work on it there and then submit it for review. Deb (talk) 07:31, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Giants-in-the-Earth.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Giants-in-the-Earth.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Giants-in-the-Earth.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Giants-in-the-Earth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carol Lynn Pearson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mutual Improvement Association ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Carol_Lynn_Pearson check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Carol_Lynn_Pearson?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph Barlow Forbes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Barlow Forbes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joseph Barlow Forbes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 22:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Joseph Barlow Forbes
Draft:Joseph Barlow Forbes, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Joseph Barlow Forbes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Joseph Barlow Forbes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. North America1000 02:52, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Joseph Barlow Forbes


A tag has been placed on Draft:Joseph Barlow Forbes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Paleo Neonate  – 04:13, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Clara W. McMaster for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clara W. McMaster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Clara W. McMaster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 01:51, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Dean M. Davies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dean M. Davies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dean M. Davies& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 07:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Linda S. Reeves for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda S. Reeves is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Linda S. Reeves until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 10:50, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Elizabeth Sandford
Hello, Thmazing. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Elizabeth Sandford, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:18, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Campbell Grant


Hello, Thmazing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Campbell Grant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ― Abelmoschus  Esculentus  08:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Linda S. Reeves for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda S. Reeves is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Linda S. Reeves& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 04:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Carole M. Stephens for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carole M. Stephens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Carole M. Stephens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 21:01, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kathleen H. Hughes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathleen H. Hughes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kathleen H. Hughes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 21:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Carl B. Cook for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl B. Cook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Carl B. Cook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 22:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Clara W. McMaster


Hello, Thmazing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clara W. McMaster".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cpt Viraj  (Talk) 11:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jepson Prairie
Hello, Thmazing,

Thanks for creating Jepson Prairie! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 16:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jepson (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jepson ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jepson_%28surname%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jepson_%28surname%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Do i sounds gay listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Do i sounds gay. Since you had some involvement with the Do i sounds gay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question)  05:36, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ECHS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Camino High School ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/ECHS check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/ECHS?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Henry J. Latham (writer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henry J. Latham (writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Henry J. Latham (writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Campbell Grant
Draft:Campbell Grant, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Campbell Grant and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Campbell Grant during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Marc Kupper&#124;talk 22:59, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

References and communication
Hello, Thmazing. I've sent you three messages but haven't heard back; could you please respond to User:Thmazing? It's still sitting there as an unreferenced articles, but I wasn't sure if you understood about references and external links or not; happy to help if you have any questions. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

References and communication (again)
Hello, Thmazing, can you please respond to User talk:Thmazing? Refusing to communicate with editors who are trying to work with you goes against the policies WP:CONDUCT and WP:DISPUTE and is disruptive. You know how to edit your talk page, you have done so many times, so please work with me. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:KNOWFREEDOM by Donté Clark (book cover).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:KNOWFREEDOM by Donté Clark (book cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Elizabeth Sandford


Hello, Thmazing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elizabeth Sandford".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 16:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Campbell Grant (February 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Campbell Grant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Campbell Grant, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Campbell_Grant Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Campbell_Grant reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mike Allred, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 04:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Official Declaration moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Official Declaration, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Official Declaration (May 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Official Declaration and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Official Declaration, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Official_Declaration Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Official_Declaration reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Official Declaration has been accepted
 Official Declaration, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Official_Declaration help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Zanimum (talk) 03:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Julie Shea
You started this article.

I think there is something wrong with the phrase "noting athlete of the year" and maybe the correction is obvious but it isn't coming to me. I know it's been some time but can you tell me what you intended to write?-- S Philbrick (Talk)  02:12, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Priestess (rapper) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Priestess (rapper), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priestess (rapper) (November 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Priestess (rapper) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Priestess (rapper), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Priestess_(rapper) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Priestess_(rapper) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Elizabeth Sandford


Hello, Thmazing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elizabeth Sandford".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1986 Los Angeles Public Library fire


Hello, Thmazing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1986 Los Angeles Public Library fire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Campbell Grant


Hello, Thmazing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Campbell Grant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

"Kim ki chung" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kim ki chung. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,Rosguill talk 17:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

"Adsf" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Adsf. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)