User talk:Thmhar3

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please always observe our core policies. --Eastmain 06:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles need to have a neutral point of view, and your article seemed to be written from the company's perspective. Take a look at how articles on other large hosting companies are written, with particular reference to the references in reliable sources at the end of the article, and you will have a better chance of writing an article which other editors will consider appropriate. --Eastmain 06:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on 1.FM, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:1.FM. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Realkyhick 06:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. The Rambling Man 06:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:1.fm.png
Thanks for uploading Image:1.fm.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

EGI Hosting
You need to assert notability of the company - familiarise yourself with WP:CORP which provides guidance on what is considered to be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Let me know if I can be of any help. The Rambling Man 07:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:1.fm.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:1.fm.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Concerning 1.fm
Hello to you; have a read at WP:CORP, WP:WEB, notability and WP:COI. Understand the wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a directory in which one ought to have an entry. As far as I see it, 1.fm does not fulfill the requirements for notability as for now. It if is or becomes notable enough in its own rights, someone else will create an article about it in time. Especially the fact that you are related professionally to the enterprise which the article is about makes it difficult not to see it as borderline spam. If you want to contest the deltion you may do so at WP:DRV. Cheers. Lectonar 15:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)