User talk:Thnidu/Archive 2


 * User talk:Thnidu
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 1
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 2
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 3
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 4
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 5

Crab rangoons
Only users who activate the gadget is able to do that, and if you want to answer, answer tomorrow. Thanks. Cheers!--  Allied Rangoon‧talk   01:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Couple things here...
 * It would make more sense to keep the whole conversation in one place, not just for my benefit but for the benefit of others reading it (as I benefited from
 * I can probably remember what you and I were talking about and where, because it was just last night, but you can't always count on that. See point 1.
 * Read admin 's answer to you under User_talk:Jwoodward48wiki, and the comment I'm about to add there, and stop trying to close discussions on other people's talk pages.
 * --Thnidu (talk) 14:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Helvetica diacritic
Hi, back in april you reported a problem with a diacritic not displaying correctly in Helvetica. I have now received the following statement from Apple engineers: "We believe this issue has been addressed in the latest OS X Yosemite Developer Preview". I still need to test, but it's looking good, so thank you ! —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 09:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

2014 Hiroshima landslides
Thank you from your help with article. I'm not native English speaker. Fruitmince (talk) 00:40, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm glad I could help. Thnidu (talk) 04:49, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

RFC/U for user Worldedixor problems
I started a discussion at Requests for comment/Worldedixor to help address problems with this user. Please feel free to add your own issues in the appropriate sections, endorse, or add comments on the talk page.~Technophant (talk) 19:13, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks much
Thank you for your helpful copy edit to the Featured Article I worked on, Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties, much appreciated, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Reverted by Mr. Granger. Apparently these really are uses, which in an academic work like this means they must be quotations. Mr. Granger's edit comment is
 * Undid revision 632245920 by Thnidu (talk) - the source says "uses", and gives specific examples that are clearly uses rather than mentions
 * Presumably "the source" is the book itself, which I have not seen, but Fairman is not a linguist and I don't assume a non-linguist will understand or use the distinction. However, the "specific examples" must be quotations, which in this book would be uses, justifying Mr. Granger's revert of my good-faith edit. And therefore... Thank you, Mr. Granger. Thnidu (talk) 15:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


 * By "the source", I mean the citation in the article, which is to this site, which discusses Fairman's essay. Surprisingly, the uses (or at least some of them) appear not to be quotations—I guess Fairman's essay is written in a more informal tone than you might expect for an academic work. —Granger (talk · contribs) 15:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I see what you mean. The locus citatus is note 226, p. 33 of the article (p.34 of the PDF), bolding added:
 * 276. Christopher M. Fairman, Fuck, 28 CARDOZO L. REV. 1711 (2007). This article was expanded into the book with the same title. FAIRMAN, supra note 261. Each work seems to be more of an excuse to use the word than to treat the issue seriously. For example, the first two words of the article-immediately after the one-word title-are "Oh fuck." Fairman, Fuck, CARDOZO L. REV. 1711, 1711. The author keeps his promise that the reader would find no "sanitized version" of the word in the article. Id. In sixty pages, he uses the word more than 560 times (not counting the table of contents and the footnotes), for an average of more than nine times per page, and has such playful subheads as "Fuck History" and "Fuck Jurisprudence." Similarly, the author begins chapter one of the book this way: "Oh fuck. Let's just get this out of the way." FAIRMAN, supra note 261, at 1. Yet, in the fifteen-page prologue, the author had used the word at least thirty-five times. Id at vii-xxii. And, the word appeared in the titles of eight of the sixteen chapters listed in the table of contents. It is unclear, therefore, what the author was attempting to "get out of the way."
 * Hopkins, the author of this article, seems to feel that there's a contradiction between writing a serious article about "fuck" and playing with the word. I disagree. But none of that seriously affects the immediate question. Many of these occurrences of the word are indeed uses, not mentions, though I can't (and wouldn't) do a count to see whether Hopkins knows the difference. Thnidu (talk) 20:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks,, I happen to agree with the three sentences of your last paragraph, above. :) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

If you are interested..
Was wondering if you could you take a look at the Spokane, Washington article and FAC. Dank has finished half of it, up to the Economy section, but I think hes focused on other things at the moment and he thinks this article could use another good copyedit. The article has 2 supports at the moment and were trying to push it over the line. If you are interested, we would love your help, if not, no worries and happy holidays!G755648 (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Sure, I'll have a go at it. I probably won't get through it tonight, though, as it's just past midnight here. --Thnidu (talk) 05:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Done! Please have a look at it. --Thnidu (talk) 08:02, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I somehow missed your message here until you pinged me again, lol. As Dank said below, it is a brilliant copyediting job and Im so glad I tapped the guy who is a linguist to look at it. If Dank says its good, its got to be true. I dont know if you saw, but I thought you might be interested that I added a note in the article about one of the stories for the origin of the name, "Spokane". Its an interesting little tidbit if anything. Thank you again for your awesome contributions all over this website. You are amazing!G755648 (talk) 02:30, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Aww, gee, thanks! I wrote to one of my old classmates in linguistics who has worked with Salishan languages about that place name. He wrote back:
 * But every single so-called meaning of a Salish place name, every single one that I've heard or seen, is total fabrication on the part of some white man who was quoted because he was there before the quoter.
 * He passed the question on to a colleague of his who has done particular study of place names in the area. If I can, I'll find a way to incorporate their answers into the article. --Thnidu (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Just looked around your userspace, and I'm impressed as hell. Then I looked at the copyediting job you did on Spokane, and it's beautiful ... everything improves readability. (I'm going to make a few minor formatting edits, but I'm leaving your words alone.) I missed the boat on putting together an academic career ... that didn't bother me (much) until I got involved with Wikipedia 7 years ago ... now I find myself sorely needing help from linguists, and rarely get it in the normal day-to-day stuff. To give you a one-link introduction to what I'm up to, see WT:TFA; it's very likely that I'll soon be in charge of vetting and writing the first thing that comes up each day on the Main Page, the blurb on "Today's Featured Article". I've been keeping data for a long time that may or may not be of use to linguists; let's talk about that some time. - Dank (push to talk) 12:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm feeling slightly embarrassed about my copyediting job there ... but that's silly, I shouldn't be. I have to pick my battles, so I typically only fix things that I know people are going to back me up on. But I'd be willing to fight for many of the changes you made (not that we have a lot of copyediting fights at FAC ... I could use a few more!) - Dank (push to talk) 12:22, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm starting to look at the second half of the article now (I haven't worked on this part before). I reverted this edit of yours ... we don't allow "see also" statements in the text, because we've found that people misuse them to imply things that they're not willing to (or can't) find sources for. It would be fine to say for instance "In (whatever year) there were three Jewish congregations in Spokane", but in general, and especially at FAC, you have to cite a source, and you have to check the source yourself. "See also" statements can be fine as section hatnotes, particularly when they support our summary style. - Dank (push to talk) 15:03, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks. It's good to get confirmation and appreciation. I was a bit worried at the reversion for a second, till I read the note and came here to see the discussion. Perfectly understandable, I was just unaware of some of the fine points. --Thnidu (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure thing, and I'm always happy to answer questions. - Dank (push to talk) 18:47, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I've sourced the Jewish congregation data. Would you like to take another look at the ¶? --Thnidu (talk) 21:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure, I've made an edit and I'll comment at the FAC. Thanks. - Dank (push to talk) 21:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Chautauqua. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 00:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


 * All true and reasonable, but that wasn't a comment on the article or an editorial opinion. I saw a dead link, tried to recover it from archive.org, and wasn't able to, so I left a note to spare other editors the same waste of time. I can see that it would have been better for me to wrap that note in an HTML comment. I also think it would have been better for you to do the same rather than revert it. What do you think? --Thnidu (talk) 00:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * You might be right about commenting it out; that didn't occur to me. Typically I leave a note on the talk page rather than in the coding for issues like that. I posted the template here because I template regulars. It takes the emotion and wording out of play. On your suggestion though, I'll go back and add a comment. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Using a template that way makes sense to me, for that reason. Thanks for putting the note back, as a comment. --Thnidu (talk) 03:42, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * An afterthought: a good reason for putting it into an HTML comment in the code rather than on the talk page is to accommodate different styles of copyediting. One person may read or scan the entire talk page for recent developments and methodically copyedit the whole article. Another, or the same editor on a different occasion, may notice something that looks wrong while reading the article for itself, and just go in to change that one item. --Thnidu (talk) 08:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

RE: "the more beautiful flower"
Salve Thnidu,

Mi dankas vin pro viaj konsiloj kaj korektado, mi esperas ke vi ne ĝenu ke mi skribas al vi en esperanto, sed kiel vi povis vidi, mia angla ne estas tiom bona :P. Feliĉajn decembrajn festojn kaj fruktodonan novjaron el Kolombio. -- Remux - I will never forget that I fell in love with the most beautiful flower Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 01:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Salve amice! Tute ne ĝenas min tio, ke vi skribas al me "verde". Male: estas por mi plezuro, korespondi verdalingve. Kaj mi ĝojas pro tio, ke mi povis helpi vin tiel; kaj ankaŭ mi al vi esperas feliĉan feston, kaj sanan kaj fruktodonan novjaron. :-) --Thnidu (talk) 01:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE holiday 2014 newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrolled topicon
Hello Thnidu, On your user page, you are currently displaying the Autopatrolled topicon, which tells other editors you have Autopatrolled rights. You currently do not have such right, and I ask you if you would please remove the icon from your user page. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 05:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry! I'm not sure how that happened. Right away. --Thnidu (talk) 06:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Wait a minute. I have "autoreviewer", which seems to have been in general recently renamed to "autopatrolled". I'm pretty sure I was given that legitimately. I'm in the middle of something right now, and then I really need to get to bed (00:21 here). I'll look at this tomorrow and get back to you.
 * (Heh. So I did recognize "Judecca" correctly. Sometime I'd like to ask why you chose that ID.) --Thnidu (talk) 06:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I've reviewed the revision history of my talk page and I can't find any justification for it – though I thought I had one – so I'm taking it off. --Thnidu (talk) 01:53, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, if you've been editing for a while and created more than 50 articles other than disambiguation pages and redirect pages, you'll have a chance in receiving the right. – JudeccaXIII (talk) 02:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I've been editing for 9 years, but I'm pretty sure I haven't created nearly that many articles. I do far more editing than creating. --Thnidu (talk) 03:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * mmmm..You need to create at least 50. I'v only made 5 as you can see on my user page. Keep searching for topics not on Wikipedia and maybe you can start from there on your sandbox. Make sure those topics can be expanded. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 03:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice, but it's already the case that

and I'm already in the WP:GOCE. --Thnidu (talk) 03:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Hi, Thnidu! Re WP:Teahouse/Questions, the place to go with requests for options in the cite templates is Module_talk:Citation/CS1. That's where to find User talk:Trappist the monk – maintainer of the CS1 templates, silent fixer of broken cites, and one of my heroes on Wikipedia. He's always happy to listen to suggestions, but don't be surprised if he tells you why that idea was rejected years ago :) – Margin1522 (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Gotcha journalism
Sorry about removing your talk message. I think the message before messed that page up.

Anyway, it wasn't my bot that added the tag. It was added by a user back in February of 2014. Bgwhite (talk) 07:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Oof. Looks like I must have misread the revision history search. Anyway, it's not there now. Sorry to've bothered you needlessly. --Thnidu (talk) 01:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)


 * No problem. I've done the same thing myself and will do it again.  On the bright side... I know a fellow retired University peon, somebody who remembers typewriters (IBM Selectric II was the best) and a cunning linguist.  I wish I had the brain to be a linguist.  Bgwhite (talk) 02:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

GOCE Feb. 2015 Blitz
File size: 50 kB Prose size (including all HTML code): 12 kB References (including all HTML code): 570 B Wiki text: 17 kB Prose size (text only): 10 kB (1682 words) "readable prose size" References (text only): 35 B Finished but not during Blitz
 * Category:All articles needing copy edit
 * 1) Ancient Greek personal names (working)

Thnidu (talk) 18:28, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thnidu/Template:AHDEL
Hello Thnidu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thnidu/Template:AHDEL for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Schetm (talk) 06:36, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

The shit hits the fan–Going offline
DON'T EXPECT ANY COMPUTER CONTACT WITH ME FOR A WHILE.


 * I just saw a mouse.
 * I have some routine but urgent business with the IRS and the DMV.
 * And NOW my laptop won't take a charge. It says it has 49minutes of battery power left. I'm putting this message out to my main contacts, backing it up, shutting down, and taking it in for service. I have some access via my smartphone but don't count on it.

Thnidu (talk) 19:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC) — archived 01:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Ping
Could you please take some time to consider what you are seeing on the post you responded to here, and consider completely removing your response, which could inflame an already sensitive situation and instead, try to write something less inflammatory? A careful read should reveal to you that this is not an everyday situation. I have privately emailed, and also think that might think twice about what a templated warning delivered via a script/bot to this editor is likely to accomplish. Please read carefully and rethink your approach; bringing out the term "jackass" and your credentials might not be the best way to proceed in any circumstance, but certainly not this one. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 13:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I thought carefully before responding as I did "Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing "seems to me to be a calm and constructive response? Theroadislong (talk) 13:57, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * There's nothing technically wrong there-- I can't fault you-- but I thought the approach might be more helpful than a templated message.  Tough situation.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 14:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I only now saw these comments. I have taken your advice. --Thnidu (talk) 09:20, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much ... I hope the situation stabilizes. Bst, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 13:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Thnidu (talk) 22:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

GOCE June 2015 newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Ralph Lundsten
''[Incorporating KMJA's corrections of 150720. Posted (15.08.10) ]'' ''[If any more work to do, see Lundsten's own discography section, including this "Opus listing" PDF]
 * 1966 – Dokumentation 1 (Elektronmusikstudion). (name of this organization: The electronic music studio)
 * 1967 – MUMS (Musik under miljoner stjärnor). Music beneath millions of stars
 * 1968 – Elektronisk musik (with Leo Nilson). Electronic music
 * 1969 – Tellus. Fågel Blå. Tellus. Blue Bird
 * 1969 – Svit för elektroniskt dragspel. Suite for electronic accordion
 * 1970 – Erik XIV och Ristningar. Erik XIV and Carvings
 * 1970 – Ölskog. Beer forest
 * 1971 – Gustav III. Nattmara Nightmare
 * 1972 – Fadervår. Our Father
 * 1973 – Strömkarlen: Nordisk natursymfoni nr 1. The Water Sprite: Nordic Nature Symphony No. 1
 * 1973 – Skräck och skratt, resor i okända världar. Horror and laughter, trips in unknown worlds
 * 1975 – Shangri-La
 * 1975 – Johannes och huldran: Nordisk natursymfoni nr 2. Johannes and the Lady of the Woods: Nordic Nature Symphony No. 2
 * 1976 – Cosmic Love
 * 1977 – Ralph Lundsten's Universe
 * 1978 – Discophrenia
 * 1979 – Alpha Ralpha Boulevard
 * 1980 – Paradissymfonin. Paradise Symphony
 * 1981 – En midvintersaga: Nordisk natursymfoni nr 3. A Midwinter Saga: Nordic Nature Symphony No. 3
 * 1982 – The New Age
 * 1983 – En sommarsaga: Nordisk natursymfoni nr 4 A Summer Saga: Nordic Nature Symphony No. 4/Pop Age
 * 1984 – Trolltagen: Nordisk natursymfoni nr 5 (Bewitched: Nordic Nature Symphony No. 5)/Dreamscape
 * 1985 – Välkommen (contains The Ages of Man). Welcome
 * 1986 – Fantasia by Starlight – 星夜幻想 (CD/LP/cassette published in Japan). Starry night fantasy
 * 1986 – The Dream Master
 * 1990 – Johannes och huldran (Max von Sydow reads Gustav Sandgren's story "Johannes och huldran", accompanied by Lundsten's music) Johannes and the lady of the woods
 * 1992 – Drömmarnas landskap: Nordisk natursymfoni nr 6. Landscape of Dreams: Nordic Nature Symphony No. 6
 * 1993 – Nordic Light
 * 1994 – The Joy of Being
 * 1995 – In Time and Space
 * 1996 – Inspiration (EMI Classic)
 * 1996 – Årstiderna: Nordisk natursymfoni nr 7. The Seasons: Nordic Nature Symphony No. 7
 * 2002 – En själens vagabond. A Vagabond of the Soul
 * 2003 – Cosmic Phantazy
 * 2004 – På drömda stigar. Pathways of the Mind
 * 2005 – Like the wind my longing – Classic pearls 1972–2004 by Ralph Lundsten
 * 2007 – Ut i vida världen Out in the Wide World: Symphonia Linnæi (Latin: Symphony of Linnaeus), Out in the Wide World, In the early Days of Summer, Song of the Mermaids, A Summer Saga (first performance)
 * 2007 – Lovetopia
 * 2008 – Electronic Music from the 60s and 70s (a boxed set comprising 4 previously released CDs)
 * 2008 – Dance in the Endless Night

My talk page stuff

 * User talk:Thnidu
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 1
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 2
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 3
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 4
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 5