User talk:Thnidu/Archive 3


 * User talk:Thnidu
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 1
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 2
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 3
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 4
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 5

Ministry of Defence (Singapore)
Archived 2015-09-11.0630 (UTC)

Ohhh i am not vandal but can not speaking, reading and written in mandarin/chinese language. must delete mandarin/chinese language link??? Akuindo (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete it? You already, and without explanation! I have put it back.
 * I support 's advice at User_talk:Akuindo:
 * Are you sure you should be editing on wp:en? your english expression lets you down. you must be very careful if you have short level of english. Perhaps you should be editing in the language wikipedia of your original language. User:Satusuro (12:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC))
 * ... and not here. --Thnidu (talk) 01:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Ohhh i am sorry. i i accidentally. yeahhh. Akuindo (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * So...
 * If your command of a language isn't good enough, don't edit text in that language.
 * From what I've seen of your English, it does not warrant the en-4 Babel userbox, "This user speaks English at a near-native level", that you have on your home user page. Your English level appears to be no higher than 2 (intermediate), and quite possibly only 1 (basic).
 * So if you edit English text, ask someone whose English is native or at least level 3 for help. In this Wikipedia, the Teahouse question page is a very good place to ask for help.
 * That doesn't mean not to do any editing. For instance, if you see a "citation needed" flag on material you know about, and you can supply a citation, then go ahead and do it.
 * And whatever editing you do, always explain it in the edit comment area.
 * I'll see you around the wiki! --Thnidu (talk) 01:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

I visited your user home page on the Indonesian Wikipedia, and saw that you were still claiming "near-native" English ability, en-4, which is manifestly massively untrue. I've changed it to "basic" level, en-1. You clearly have some English ability, and there isn't any lower level; I'd be surprised if you can even read this message. --Thnidu (talk) 01:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

MAVEN
Archived 03:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome, I often add a to check a ref, and then  forget to remove it! 220  of  Borg 05:00, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Which of course you recognized as just what I had done. ;-$ --Thnidu (talk) 08:52, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Not immediately. Lots of red 'Cite error: ... ' messages in the references section, then I noticed there were two lists of references. One in the middle of the page. Hmm, a clue! (Thnidu did it in 'History' with a reflist. Cluedo!) - 220  of  Borg 09:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Inquirer Building
Archived 03:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Anything you want to add or change? I think it's in good enough shape to move into mainspace, we just need to get the current redirect deleted. BMK (talk) 18:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, you've done an admirable job of updating it and fleshing it out. It's ready for its closeup! Would you please take care of the move and the redirects, which you're clearly more comfortable with than I am? --Thnidu (talk) 18:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Will do. BMK (talk) 20:08, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * All done, I believe. Inquirer Building. BMK (talk) 23:42, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * What's the reason for a See also to Inquirer Building? Wouldn't a link be enough?:
 * Elverson Jr. bought land at Broad and Callowhill Streets and built the eighteen-story Elverson Building, now known as the Inquirer Building.
 * --Thnidu (talk) 02:41, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Meh. BMK (talk) 03:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll take that as a "No", but would you please explain why? I'm not trying to argue, but to understand. The better I understand such things, the better a Wikipedian I can be. --Thnidu (talk) 03:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Jews without faith
Archived 18:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry to disturb You "at home", but I have made a reply to Your comment at the talk-page of Judaism Talk:Judaism. It also includes a question to You. If possible, could You please help me (there)? I just want to fully understand the relationship Jews - Judaism. Cheers Boeing720 (talk) 20:19, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * (Done. --Thnidu (talk) 22:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC))

About Talmud article
Archived 18:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello again, if You remember me ? Sorry to disturb you "at home", but I wonder what you say about this lead sentence in the Talmud article. "The term "Talmud" normally refers to the collection of writings named specifically the Babylonian Talmud, although there is also an earlier collection known as the Jerusalem Talmud, or Palestinian Talmud ." I just find it strange if this name actually is used by Jews. If I'm correct so far, then I think "Palestinian Talmud" is an offense and should be erased. But I simply do not know, perhaps you could be kind enough to give me an advice ? I'm of Christian faith myself. But this doesn't rule out an interest of other religions. Boeing720 (talk) 14:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Usually called "Jerusalem Talmud". I'm not familiar with "Palestinian Talmud", but I'm not much of a Talmud scholar. I don't think it would be offensive, as it would refer to the Talmud composed in the land of Palestine when we lived there, not to the modern political Palestine. From the article:
 * The Jerusalem Talmud was compiled in the Land of Israel during the 4th-5th centuries CE, then divided between the Byzantine provinces of Palaestina Prima and Palaestina Secunda. The Jerusalem Talmud is also known as the Palestinian Talmud or Talmud de-Eretz Yisrael (Talmud of the Land of Israel). These latter names are considered more accurate by some because, while the work was certainly composed in "the West" (i.e. the Holy Land), it originates from the Galilee area rather than from Jerusalem.
 * --Thnidu (talk) 03:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your detailed reply. I'm also glad for your excess information and explinations.

Boeing720 (talk) 10:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your collection
Archived 18:16, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be interested in the experimental Gather edit feed for watching vandalism on Philadelphia pages. Let me know personally if you find that useful! Jdlrobson (talk) 16:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do. Thanks. --Thnidu (talk) 04:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I've been using it, but now I can't see anymore how to add a page to a collection in Mobile Beta, or how to add a collection. Wha' hoppen? --Thnidu (talk) 01:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Hey there was a bug but it should be fixed now though. Could you point me to the page you are having the problem? Jdlrobson (talk) 02:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * working now. Thanks. --Thnidu (talk) 02:41, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

List of people from Pennsylvania
Archived 18:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Have a look at List of people from Pennsylvania. I added "TOC limit|2" template to top and changed sectional toc to "compact TOC" template. That may be what you were looking to achieve. If not, feel free to revert. (Note:  The downside to this method is that a sectional "toc" must be adjusted if a section is rebalanced.  Not too onerous to a rather stable list.)173.52.75.38 (talk) 03:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry. I just undid what i had done. I see that if two sections have exact sub-section heading (e.g., "A–B"), in the second compact toc it links to first (as in, "S–Z" in athletes sub-toc links to "S–Z" of actors). I may have missed some setting in documentation for Template:Compact ToC.--173.52.75.38 (talk) 03:29, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * That's why I've been using anchors: so i can link to, e.g., #ActorsAB. A bonus is that the TOC (and the §'s link list - "compact toc", yes?) can still say A-B while linking correctly. --Thnidu (talk) 16:32, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

About the excessively long (unarchived) talk pages for some articles
Archived 18:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi! I've notice your recent posts at the Ursula LeGuin talk page, and wonder if you find the crusty old dregs of unarchived posts confusing. For an instance, the last post by User:Hlnodovic anywhere on Wikipedia.en was more than two years ago. I'm beginning to consider setting up the archievebot for article talke pages like this one else it take on an aspect of speaking 'crosstime. What do you think? And thanks for the work on UR's page. I ocassionally reread her novels—Left Hand... most recently—but the paperbacks' pages are beginning to powder. — Neonorange (talk) 05:08, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, archiving would be a good idea. Sometimes I just get involved in an issue with somebody who hasn't touched it in eons.
 * That's what libraries are for. --Thnidu (talk) 05:29, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, the result is that you are doing good work in the articles. But I sometimes see recent rants responding to pre–2006 threads—dead since that year, to boot. Where to draw the line? I'm considering a cutoff the results in leaving no more than two years of an inactive thread unless the thread covers reviews for FA or GA. I hate to think of a eager new editor posting a reply to a dead thread—and waiting, and waiting, and... — Neonorange (talk) 05:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Good idea. --Thnidu (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

(following new section by same editor) More frequent archiving of Talk:Ursula K. Le Guin would have preempted the section-by-section replies from Thnidu this week. Would that have been good or bad?

, are you "considering a cutoff" for manual archiving of that talk page alone? or considering more broadly? or participating in current more general discussion somewhere? --P64 (talk) 21:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, a. not manual b. more broadly c. only what I've run across, for now. See my question above for, answered by Thnidu. I've been considering only author-article tps on my watchlist (so I can watch over time). For some article tps I see more timely auto-archiving as an easy question to answer; some are more difficult. I began to consider a particular problem with auto-archiving—very stale, somewhat contentious, initial posts that eventually draw a disruptive rant (in one case, more than nine years later). Any ideas? Or examples? — Neonorange (talk) 00:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1. "only author-article tps", "For some article tps": Are those regular plurals of TP or implied plurals of TPS?
 * 2. I'm having trouble understanding this: "I began to consider a particular problem with auto-archiving—very stale, somewhat contentious, initial posts that eventually draw a disruptive rant (in one case, more than nine years later)."  Wouldn't auto-archiving remove very old posts from high visibility and lessen the likelihood of long-delayed rants? --Thnidu (talk) 00:46, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * @Thnidu: Sorry for my lack of precision. For 1.—yes I do mean the plural, more than one talk page. For 2.—I failed to specify the problem I saw sufficiently. Setting the auto-archive bot parameters for too long an interval does, in my opinion, increase the risk of attracting long delayed rants (and worse). I think it would be a way of improving the tone of discourse in Wikipedia. On the Stephen King talk page I shortened the auto-archive cycle to archive a BLP violation (my explanation is still on the talk page.)
 * I have added your talk page to my watchlist as I appreciate your work at Ursula Le Guin—and your persistence). — Neonorange (talk) 01:06, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1. OK, thanks... though I was asking about WP:TPs vs WP:TPS = Talk Page Stalker! ;-) 2. Ah, we agree then. — (Bows.) Thank you. --Thnidu (talk) 01:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1. OK, thanks... though I was asking about WP:TPs vs WP:TPS = Talk Page Stalker! ;-) 2. Ah, we agree then. — (Bows.) Thank you. --Thnidu (talk) 01:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Professional Artist Client Toolkit
Archived 18:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)



A tag has been placed on Professional Artist Client Toolkit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 18:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angélique Mezzara (September 2)
Archived 18:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angélique Mezzara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ang%C3%A9lique_Mezzara Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ang%C3%A9lique_Mezzara reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Onel 5969  TT me 14:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Zoran Zaev.jpg
Archived 18:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 18:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Discussion taken to Media copyright questions --Thnidu (talk) 19:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Thnidu/Ingress fan sites
archived (15.11.06)

Quoting my fill-in of the "Contested deletion" reason:


 * This page should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because it is not intended as an article. I am accumulating notes here to add to Ingress (video game) under . I am using wikicode to organize it because it's available and simple. That's not what I intend for the content.   --Thnidu (talk) 18:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You made the article in the wrong space. Instead of userspace, you put the article in mainspace. I am going to move the article in your userspace. Then, I will ask an admin to delete the redirect.  //nepaxt  18:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Ahhh! Yes, that was my mistake. Sorry, and thanks for fixing it. I would move it myself, but that could interfere with your moving it. --Thnidu (talk) 19:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

It's now located at User:Thnidu/Ingress fan sites. Cheers. //nepaxt 19:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your thoughts?
archived (16.06.27)

Timeline of Philadelphia has a discussion about selection and inclusion criteria. Two editors are discussing it, but we have divergent views. More opinions would be helpful. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Major edits in Patidar reservation agitation
archived 2016-11-09

§ July
Deleted this. Besides the grammar ("...include..." one group), this is not supported by the sources.
 * The other major community organisations participating in the agitation include the Sardar Patel Group (SPG), headed by Lalji Patel, Sardar Patel Seva Dal, Patidar Sankalan Samiti, Patidar Arakshan Samiti and Sardar Sena.

(Named ref "Dparty2015" was used elsewhere; I pasted it in there.)
 * You are right in removing them. The agitation was handled by two major groups, Sardar Seva Dal of Lalji and SPG of Hardik. But there were many smaller groups involved. They collectively handled the agitation. So it is OK to not mention that smaller groups as two major are already mentioned. I think I may find some refs for them but they are too many to add here. So should we add??
 * Wait, now I'm really confused. Are Sardar Patel Seva Dal, Patidar Sankalan Samiti, Patidar Arakshan Samiti and Sardar Sena people or groups? At least for a non-Indian who can't tell from a name whether it refers to a person, an organization, a place, or something else, "Sardar Patel Group (SPG), headed by Lalji Patel, Sardar Patel Seva Dal, Patidar Sankalan Samiti, Patidar Arakshan Samiti and Sardar Sena" looks like the name of one group, "Sardar Patel Group (SPG)", followed by the names of five people who head it. And what about Sardar Patel Sevadal? Or is that just another spelling of Sardar Patel Seva Dal?
 * In any case, the two or three major groups are enough, as long as the text doesn't imply that they were the only ones. So you can add the sentence back in, with appropriate changes, and I'll check it in context again. --Thnidu (talk) 17:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Sardar Patel Seva Dal, Patidar Sankalan Samiti, Patidar Arakshan Samiti and Sardar Sena are four different groups. SPG is an another group to headed by Lalji Patel. PAAS is headed by Hardik Patel. Sardar Patel Sevadal/Seva Dal are same. I think these all group names are not needed in article. SPG and PAAS are two major and main groups. So they are enough.-Nizil (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * P.S. [NOT IMPORTANT FOR ARTICLE BUT FOR SOME CLARIFICATION] Many above group names include Sardar or Sardar Patel after Sardar Patel, the independence activist and the first home minister of India. His statue Statue of Unity is under construction which will the tallest in the world when completed.-Nizil (talk) 18:53, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

§ 25–31 August

 * The mob vandalised shops in the CTM area and the police fired eight teargas shells to disperse the mob.

What's that?
 * CTM is a locality/neighbourhood in Ahmedabad.Quora Though nobody is sure about full form of CTM. ;)

§ Social

 * Several other communities' leaders also started agitation demanding reservation along similar lines including Brahmin, Thakore, Vaishnava, Rajput, Sindhi, Kansara, Soni and Raghuvanshi communities in Gujarat.

I've generally been linking names of ethnic/social/caste/etc. groups, because they are unfamiliar to most non-Indians. In this sentence, "Kansara" has no article, but I'm redlinking it as a candidate. Does "Soni" belong in this list at all? It has a very small article, created as a stub nine years ago by an author who came close to being blocked and who hasn't contributed since the end of 2007.
 * Kansara should be redlinked. It is a caste of bell-makers and utnsil-makers. Soni is a caste historically associated with jewellary making and many are still in business. You may link it with Soni (caste).
 * Done. But see Talk:Soni (caste) for fixes needed there.--Thnidu (talk) 17:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking deep interest. :) -Nizil (talk) 04:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * P.S. Decided to create Kansara.-Nizil (talk) 04:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * That looks pretty good. I'll copyedit for grammar, idiom, etc. later. --Thnidu (talk) 16:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * In Kansara you have "The Kansara belongs to Gujarat, India. Their associated groups live in Maharashtra such as Tambat." Does this mean that the Kansara live (mainly) in Gujarat? What does "associated groups" mean? Is Tambat a town, a region, or what? --Thnidu (talk) 17:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Kansara live mostly in Gujarat. Every caste has associated castes which are in related historically or in same profession. See infobox. Tambat is caste associated by similar profession.-Nizil (talk) 18:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hope you are in good health now. Btw I am also in medical profession.. so just-Nizil (talk) 18:45, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

My talk page stuff

 * User talk:Thnidu
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 1
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 2
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 3
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 4
 * User talk:Thnidu/Archive 5