User talk:Thockey419

February 2022
Hello, I'm Severestorm28. I noticed that you recently removed content from Anna Kaplan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Severe storm  28  02:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Anna Kaplan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  02:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Roberts rules of order?
I don't think Roberts Rules of order counts as WP:RS, the cited source says all senate dems voted against, I don't see why you need to remove content in | this edit and | this edit Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Anna Kaplan
The source is correct in its reporting. If you have another source that says otherwise, then feel free to add it. ... disco spinster   talk  02:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)