User talk:Thom/Archive 1

Disintegration
Oops! Not sure how I missed that... Thanks for fixing my slip on the Disintegration page about Bloodflowers' place in the trilogy. SouperAwesome (talk) 08:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem.Thom (talk) 12:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stuart.braithwaite.musical.equipment.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Stuart.braithwaite.musical.equipment.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fyfe.dangerfield.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Fyfe.dangerfield.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Teen Spirit
There's no reason to rearrange the page. WesleyDodds (talk) 02:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * "Composition" suffices, since the song is the subject. "Release, success, and acclaim" has that title because it deals with all three aspect in one section, whereas other song articles would be structure differently depending on what information is available for referencing purposes. The song only appears on one studio album, and relevant live recordings are discussed in the article, so listing compilation appearances is unnecessary; if anything, those compilation appearances are wroth noting on the compilations instead. The current structure of the article is pretty resilient, having gone through the Featured Article process and having been featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the past year, and it really needs no changing. Articles vary in structure, and the current structure suits this article fine. WesleyDodds (talk) 10:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I see you've done work on the Mogwai song articles (which is commendable; I like Mogwai). To compare the subjects, what works for "Tracy" doesn't necessarily work for "Smells Like Teen Spirit", and vice versa. Having honestly read every single resource available on the song, the sheer mountain of material available on "Smells Like Teen Spirit" results in a very different article than "Tracy" will ever be. Now the real question is: do you like Cocteau Twins? WesleyDodds (talk) 10:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Robots In Disguise
Hi, I was just wondering why you deleted the Robots In Disguise discography from their page? The albums remain, but all the singles etc have been deleted by you. Themirrorandthelamp (talk) 15:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Julian.barratt.boosh.live.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Julian.barratt.boosh.live.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. βcommand 20:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Julian.barratt.boosh.live.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Julian.barratt.boosh.live.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hi DrNick ! 17:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Julian.barratt.boosh.live.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Julian.barratt.boosh.live.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens .rf 13:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)  --Damiens .rf  13:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Julian.barratt.boosh.live.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Julian.barratt.boosh.live.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 22:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)