User talk:ThomDoughty

Schulte paper
The reason that this isn't acceptable, is that the paper in question is:


 * 1) Not published - see: WP:SPS
 * 2) If it had been published - then it would have been in a non-reliable source. See: Energy and Environment
 * 3) Will not be published - see:

Apparently several sceptical sites "jumped the gun", and published details about the study, before it had been through a review process. We've had discussions on this paper before (for instance here or here) --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 14:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)