User talk:Thomas Emilio Davies

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kardinya, Western Australia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kardinya, Western Australia was changed by Thomas Emilio Davies (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929467 on 2012-05-11T13:27:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:27, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Western Australia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 18:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Commonwealth of Nations, you may be blocked from editing. Ben Ben (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ben Ben (talk) 18:18, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Some of your edits seem to show a limited knowledge of what WP:NOT and WP:ABOUT might mean - give them a read before your go ahead with your reverting of others work - take care - just because you are a new editor (apparently) it doesnt mean our asserting some items on some pages might not need some consideration when your edits get reverted -'' SatuSuro 04:46, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Read some of it
SatuSuro 04:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

careful note
when adding material like ou did at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Secessionism_in_Western_Australia&oldid=491998268

the reason for the reversion is it may be a valid point to you - but is opinion as there is not a WP:RS or WP:CITE to back the assertion - as an opinion it is WP:OR and not a valid edit SatuSuro 05:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

note
Edit warring can get you blocked whether you want to be or not - see WP:3RR - if someone reverts an edit of yours - try something else - other than reverting... SatuSuro 05:25, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey
Hi Thomas, I'm one of the Perth-based admins (there's a few of us around). I admire and encourage your obvious enthusiasm, but given some of the trouble you seem to have run into above on edits on Australian topics, I strongly suggest reading the links in the template above, particularly those relating to Wikipedia pillars and policies and how Wikipedia works more broadly. It's kind of like when you go to a new country, you have to, to some extent, work with the culture that's already there to do what you want to do, and if you unintentionally violate the local customs or create a disturbance, people get upset.

Of particular concern is that on several occasions you have reverted edits by other editors without giving a reason; reversion is meant to be used only for vandalism or obvious policy enforcement, and the normal way to bring these issues up, especially if the disagreement is based on personal opinion, is by editing the talk page for the article (see WP:TALK) or by writing to the user concerned on their page (e.g. mine is User talk:Orderinchaos). Information added to Wikipedia should always be from reliable sources. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page (click the "+" at the top to add a new section to it). Best of luck. Orderinchaos 12:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

October 2012
Hello, I'm Jaellee. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Besart Berisha because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Jaellee (talk) 21:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm Satellizer. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Look-alike because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  ~satellizer~ ~talk~  23:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at West Coast Eagles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The-Pope (talk) 16:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm Jschnur. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Joey Barton, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jschnur (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Solarra. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Jarred Gillett, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, ♥ Solarra ♥  ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 11:48, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jarred Gillett with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:24, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jarred Gillett. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀ 12:32, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Earth, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 10:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 10:35, 7 May 2014 (UTC) That was quick, impressive.

The Signpost: 6 September 2016
 News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia
 * News and notes: AffCom still grappling with WMF Board's criteria for new chapters


 * Special report: Olympics readership depended on language


 * In the media: Librarians, Wikipedians, and a library of Wikipedia coverage


 * WikiProject report: Watching Wikipedia


 * Featured content: Entertainment, sport, and something else in-between


 * Traffic report: From Phelps to Bolt to Reddit


 * Technology report: Wikimedia mobile sites now don't load images if the user doesn't see them


 * Recent research: One study encounters critique of its ethics from Wikipedians; another critiques the ethics employed by Wikipedia


 * Blog: Upload of free photos from Swiss library underway

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 16:53, 9 September 2016 (UTC)