User talk:Thomas Leonard96/sandbox

Alex's Peer Review
After looking at the defensive driving article and reading your plans for changes I definitely agree with all of your proposed changes. I think you are correct in saying that the article is underdeveloped in a lot of areas, the history section only has one source and 2 sentences overall that touch on one isolated case referencing the topic.

The lead is great, but the quote at the end definitely does feel out of place to me as well. Perhaps if you add more content later in the article you can expand the lead downwards, instead of replacing what's already there. Briefly mention whatever other subtopics you end up discussing later in the article in the expanded lead.

Other than this, it seems like you've collected quite a bit of useful information and sources to add to the article. My one word of advice would be to actually begin drafting the specific changes you've proposed so that you have some time to polish them and prepare to push them to live.

Taylor's peer review
'''Peer review ''' This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info Whose work are you reviewing? Leonard96 Link to draft you're reviewing: Defensive driving

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes. Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, first sentence. Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes it does. Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, everything in the lead is in the article. Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise. '''Lead evaluation Content'''

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, there were some good content added. Is the content added up-to-date? Up-to-date. Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, all the content is very accurate and should be there. Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No, it doesn't deal with Wikipedia equity gaps or underrepresented topics. Content evaluation Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? Yes. Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, just facts stated. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, all important facts about driving. Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? I think that it was made to persuade readers to stop speeding & doing hazardous things on the road. Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes it is. Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, they are thorough. Are the sources current? Sources are current. Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? It has a diverse spectrum of authors. There are no historically marginalized individuals. Check a few links. Do they work? Sources and references evaluation Organization

'''Guiding questions: ''' Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? it is concise, clear, and easy to read & understand. Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Grammar looks like it was checked & correct. Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The topics & content is broken down organized and factual. Organization evaluation Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, there is only 1 image though. Are images well-captioned? Image is well captioned. Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes it does. Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes, they look good in the article. Images and media evaluation