User talk:Thomasarrango

Welcome!
Hello, Thomasarrango, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as David Straange, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Jupitus Smart  18:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of David Straange


A tag has been placed on David Straange requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Jupitus Smart  18:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, I'm Jupitus Smart. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Neo-minimalism have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Besides most newcomers don't cite WP:DNB suggesting you are probably not one.  Jupitus Smart  18:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Greetings, I used no form of propaganda or puffery. I cited it because in fact I, sir isn't the newcomer, which make the 'appearing' claims false.

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Neo-minimalism. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. ''Don't add the name, unless a proper reference cites his name as an exponent of this school of art. The current list of artists mentioned have been sourced from the inline reference and David Straange is not in the reference. So unless you can provide an independent reference, don't change it   Jupitus Smart''  18:49, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Greetings, there are 17 names with only 7 references. I can't find the total 17 names, which I believe is a false practice. Explain what reference you need and I'll try my best to provide it

Also please refrain from making false and opinionated claims on who I am. I used WP:CAN because personal and biased attacks from you are unacceptable when you could have asked if I had such references. You sir are in the wrong.

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to David Straange. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Home Lander (talk) 19:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

That's a false claim I only removed it once, this is further proof of votestacking and WP:CAN I will be print screening for further use.

edited : The statement 'please stop removing' is a biased and violent claim of indication that I'm constantly harassing and tinkering, which is completely false and will be used against you if anything happens to my account

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Home Lander. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Home Lander (talk) 19:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Tyranny and misuse of power completely false. That is no way a personal attack. You sir are personally attacking me. Print screened

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day for harassing other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 20:10, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

On a note not immediately germane to the block itself, bickering over the precise wording of an instruction to not remove speedy deletion templates, and especially using it to make nebulous threats ("will be used against you") and protests of "violence", rather misses the point. If you've done something unambiguously against the rules and been asked not to do it again, all you need to do is not do it again. You don't have to like it, of course, but arguing with people over the minutia of a template they, in all likelihood, did not write, is not going to go anywhere productive. Just a suggestion intended to be productive, embrace or disregard at your own discretion. - Vianello (Talk) 02:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@Vianello (Talk) 02:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

I was never warned or even aware about 3RR, and 'will be used against you' in it's context is NOT a threat to cause physical harm etc. I don't care if I like something or not, truth is truth. I know this was handled very unprofessionally for me making an edit. I will feel a lot more comfortable if the reason me getting banned is because of 3RR, which I was unaware of because I didn't personally attack, harm, or harrass anyone it's dishonest and proof of very unprofessional editors.

Nomination of David Straange for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Straange is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Straange until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Jupitus Smart  03:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Leave me alone man you're toxic
 * You might like to know that editors are encouraged to put notices of deletion discussions on the talk pages of article creators, as a matter of politeness. You also might take a look at Civility, which is a Wikipedia policy. --Bejnar (talk) 20:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)