User talk:Thomascatterall

Welcome to Wikipedia
 Hello Thomascatterall, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

---Titodutta Thomascatterall, good luck, and have fun. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Your Question In Teahouse
A new answer has been posted Teahouse/Questions Thanks! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Found a book about Kimberly Young, not written by her. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=hdMAnL5neAAC&pg=PA333&dq=Kimberly+Young&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ku5dT9e_O4es0QWdn5XODQ&ved=0CEYQ6AEwAzgU#v=onepage&q=Kimberly%20Young&f=false --Thomascatterall (talk) 12:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Kimberly Young
No,you need to give verification for each and every entry. But, since encyclopedic entries should be verifiable try to provide as much citation as possible. In the article, you have not given any biographical information. If you have any you can add there! If you have any question, you can ask in my talk page! I have added the article in my watchlist too--Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 18:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Kimberly Young.jpeg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Kimberly Young.jpeg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://netaddictionrecovery.blogspot.com/. As a copyright violation, File:Kimberly Young.jpeg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Kimberly Young.jpeg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Kimberly Young.jpeg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Kimberly Young.jpeg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Kimberly Young.jpeg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your help. I see the image has now been deleted. --Thomascatterall (talk) 11:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

KImberly Young Talk
Hey, I can see you faced some problem with copyright of KImberly Young image. I can help there, I think. Anyway, you can have a look here. For quicker response please leave a message in my talk page. I am little bit busy these days. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 06:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Writing style
Hi mate, a couple of people have mentioned that our page reads too much like a list or CV for Kimberly Young. This morning we should change it so that the Works sections are separated and mention her most notable works in a paragraph instead of a list. Should look cleaner and make wikipedians happier. --NickBushell (talk) 11:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I think this would be beneficial to the page, after all we are new to this Wikipedia world. --Thomascatterall (talk) 11:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 16:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message sent with Global message delivery.


 * Completed the survey, thanks for being so welcoming at the Tea House! --Thomascatterall (talk) 18:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Presentation
We're marked on:


 * Content: quality of research and writing. - basically what remains of our page at the time of the presentation and amount we added.
 * Understanding: demonstrating what needs to be done with/to the content on Wikipedia.
 * Engagement: level of engagement with other Wikipedians
 * Presentation quality.

Things to include - Screenshots, discussions, editing and formatting content, code, tea house, talk pages - tito - banaticus - Smartse etc, classmate interaction, research difficulties, research breakthroughs, deletionists, inclusionists, image copyright trouble - emailing Kimberly Young's friend/colleague, invited to the tea house and asked to rate it.

--NickBushell (talk) 18:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)