User talk:Thomaschange

Speedy deletion of Brett Leigh
A tag has been placed on Brett Leigh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gwandoya  Talk 03:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Nertz, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Social Network. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted.  If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again.  If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.--Cinemaniac86Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire 14:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Festival (2011 film)


The article Festival (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable per Notability (films). The given sources are not reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Evil saltine (talk) 00:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Festival (2011 film) for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Festival (2011 film), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Festival (2011 film) until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Evil saltine (talk) 18:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, Thomaschange. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Social Network, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ''Can I suggest you cease re-adding information about Brett Leigh to Wikipedia until you can back up the additions with good cites? Your additions, for instance, to The Social Network have been removed repeatedly. Repeatedly re-adding them is disruptive.'' Escape Orbit  (Talk) 22:22, 21 October 2012 (UTC)