User talk:Thomashouck

Deleted article
Thanks for the note - which article are you referring to? The deletion log records the deletion reasons for any deleted articles. ...en passant! 09:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Below are the criteria for speedy deletions:

Articles

For any articles that are not speedy deletion candidates, use Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.

1. Very short articles providing little or no context (e.g., "He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great."). Limited content is not in itself a reason to delete if there is enough context to allow expansion. * Turning such pages into relevant redirects may sometimes be appropriate if any potential context can be found. * Be aware that some articles are contributed from other Wikipedias, or by non-fluent English speakers, which may lead to misunderstanding of the content. 2. Foreign language articles that already exist on another Wikimedia project, as a result of having been copied and pasted into Wikipedia after their creation elsewhere, or as a result of having been moved via the transwiki system. 3. Any article whose contents consist only of an external link, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, or rephrasing of the title. 4. Any article which consists only of attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title. 5. Any article that has been discussed at Articles for Deletion (or Miscellaneous deletion), where the outcome was to transwiki, and where the transwikification has been properly performed and the author information recorded. 6. Short articles that serve no purpose but to disparage their subject ("insult pages", e.g., "OMFG! Joe Random is a l0ser n00bface lolol!!!11"). ''' 7. An article about a real person that does not assert that person's importance or significance. If the assertion is disputed or controversial, it should be taken to AFD instead. For details, see Wikipedia:Deletion of vanity articles.'''


 * Never mind. My mistake. I mistakenly thought an article (page) that I was creating had been deleted when in fact it had not. Thank you.

Carver article
The article as recreated from an earlier speedy delete is a history lesson on other people. If there is something noteable about the current Mr Carver let's hear it - or it will have to be deleted again. You shouldn't just re-create deleted articles. ...en passant! 10:42, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Look - you don't really seem to be getting this. Just reverting puff about ancient relatives isn't adding to this article, nor is it establishing the noteworthiness of the subject. I had set out above the criteria for a speedy deletion of an article - which applies here - as dealing with an entirely unnoteworthy person. I have now highlighted this again for you. As this article seems to be about you I am going to move it to your (blank) user page - where it will make a fine User page. If it re-appears as separate article again and doesn't meet the criteria of noteworthiness it will be deleted and you risk being blocked. ...en passant! 12:20, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Carver Crest with Supporters PS2.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)