User talk:ThomasisScholar

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Neo-Jay 23:11, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

You're clearly not a scholar!
Before either of us violates the "Three Revert Rule," please explain what exactly you are trying to do on the talk page for Roger J. Traynor at Talk:Roger J. Traynor. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, including genealogical information on non-famous descendants of famous people. See Section 1.7 of What Wikipedia is not.

Furthermore, it is clear that you are not a scholar. A scholar who wandered off on a rambling tangent like that in an academic paper for no apparent reason would get a C at best for inability to focus on the subject. And a lawyer who went off on a tangent like that would get an F. A true scholar addresses his subject with laserlike precision and keeps irrelevant tangents to an minimum. A true scholar would also know how to cite sources properly in Turabian style or one of its relatives.

Please note that if you are unable to conform your edits to longstanding Wikipedia policies like No original research, Verifiability, and NPOV you will eventually arouse the ire of one of the Wikipedia admins and will be blocked. --Coolcaesar 06:21, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Coolcaesar and Requests for arbitration
I have noted you as an involved party and/or commenter upon the behavior of user:Coolcaesar in the filed Requests for arbitration. I greatly wish that you would comment on his behavior, and add references, links, etc. supporting your particular view to the current evidence already there. Please also explain his attitude/comments/witnessed behavior with detail about your experience in dealing with him. I do greatly appreciate it, and note that your reputation is protected upon comments at arbitration, and cannot be used against you. Thanks for your Time. --Mr.Executive 08:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)