User talk:Thomasitt1

The information on the page is simply an educated prediction of the future. If you'd like to help us edit this Nostradamus-like prediction, then tell us what we need to do. However, instantly deleting this page with potential has no advancement towards scholarly predictions for the future. I find this to be a near travesty of future telling justice. Thank You. Please tell us how we can make the page better, not gone. Help us, don't kill us.

Respectfully Submitted

Donutoblivion

Paul Herget
Regarding your hasty db-a1 deletion:

The subject of this story is obviously Paul Herget. This is of course the Paul Herget prophesied by Nostradamus in his little-known 74th quatrain. The subject is simple, though if you have any personal questions on the matter--or any suggestions you have to make our page more user-friendly--please feel free to let me know. Do not ban the page without at least letting us know what to do to make it better.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclovin13375 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Paul Herget Article
As a man who studies Paul Herget (hence the name), I can strongly support the content of this article. I find it appalling that such a squelching of educated predictions can be tolerated by a site that actually finds itself scholastically motivated. Everything up to the present is truth. It's a sham that educated and scholastically supported ideas cannot be kept on this page.

Truly a sham of education and truth

Sincerely --Pherget (talk) 04:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Paul Herget Speedy Deleation
Everthing to this date is true, and all else will become true.

Good Day Sir --Buzz tanner (talk) 04:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC) Buzz Tanner