User talk:Thomasjolon

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cupcakke (January 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cupcakke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  05:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

User-generated content
Hi there, re: this edit, Genius.com is a user-generated website, which means that users contribute to the content found there. We should only be using reliable published sources that have established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy. Other examples of insufficient user-generated sources: discussion forums, unverified Twitter accounts, IMDb, even Wikipedia itself. It's also pretty clear from the phrasing at the source that they are mirroring content found at Wikipedia, which would make it a circular reference. Anyhow, the birthdate has been removed until someone can find an unimpeachable reference. Thank you and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)