User talk:Thomasrathnamfans

Hi Friends, View details of "Thomas Rathnam" upcoming music composer from India.

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Rathnam


A tag has been placed on Thomas Rathnam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Evaders99 (talk) 05:26, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Rathnam


A tag has been placed on Thomas Rathnam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Matthew Thompson talk to me bro! 10:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Doubly pointless
Please read this. &mdash; RHaworth 16:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas rathnam


A tag has been placed on Thomas rathnam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Scopecreep (talk) 16:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Rathnam


A tag has been placed on Thomas Rathnam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 08:18, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Thomas Rathnam
Articles about this person have been deleted many times - see this deletion log. There was a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Thomas Rathnam where it was agreed that he did not meet Wikipedia's admission standard of notability, which requires showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:MUSICBIO and WP:42.

After a deletion discussion like that, you must not simply put the article in again. That was done so many times that the title was salted - protected against creation. You cannot get around that by varying the name to Thomas rathnam or T.Thomas Stephen Rathinam or Isai Aruvi Thomas Rathnam.

If you think you can show that he meets the notability requirement, you should improve the draft article in your sandbox at User:Thomasrathnamfans/Thomas Rathnam as much as you can, and then approach user, the administrator who protected the title, for permission to post it. If he does not agree, you can appeal at WP:Deletion review. Before you start, read WP:Your first article and WP:MUSICBIO carefully. JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Socks
I assume that and  are both accounts created by you. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas rathnam


A tag has been placed on Thomas rathnam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cindy ( talk to me ) 08:14, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012


A tag has been placed on Thomas rathnam requesting that it be protected against recreation. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our inclusion guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete it is considered disruptive and is grounds for blocking. Cindy ( talk to me ) 08:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SmartSE (talk) 10:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Dear Cindamuse,

We are the ardent fans of Thomas Rathnam, an upcoming Music Composer from India. We posted the article with reliable links. But most of the authors are saying that it is simply recreated. We are unable to understand it. May be it's up to you. We can't change the date of birth, birth place, composed films, cameo appearances ... so on. As an editor, we collected all those details and compiled an essay. We can't avoid the same words or dates. If you require we will place more tags. If you feel it is a copy and recreated material, please kindly make changes as a very big editor like you. Hope you will make few corrections in that article and post it again in wikepedia. As fans of Thomas rathnam, we will be very thankful to you for correcting and putting the article again in the wikepedia.

Thanking you,                              Lovingly...Thomas rathnam fans.

To re post the article "Thomas Rathnam" with required corrections
Dear All Brilliant Editors,

We the ardent fans of Thomas Rathnam keep on correcting and placing Thomas Rathnam article. As an editor, we are collecting the matters and compiling it as an essay. We can't change the date of birth, name, place, film names and other details...etc. So, we are repeating the same. It is not recreating. English is english. Most of the Editor's are saying it is recreated or copied. We can't understand that. We are not great editor's like you. Just we are music fans. So, if anything or words are wrong, please make a correction and place the article again in the wikepedia. Simply blocking the matter will make us very depressed. So, again we are unable to create some other articles about music ..etc. So, appreciate our small work and as an expert please make corrections and re post the same. Then we will also keep on posting new matters for the wikepedia community. So, guide us to create a releiable article.Hope you will correct it and repost it. If you want more reliable links or tags or informations, we are ready to give you about the article.

Lovingly... thomasrathnamfans@gmail.com                  thanks in advance

Nomination of Thoppul Kodi (2nd nomination) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thoppul Kodi (2nd nomination) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thoppul Kodi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Why did you create this article? Are you really a fan or Thomas Rathnam himself? DareshMohan (talk) 07:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)