User talk:Thomasthomsen

Welcome!

Hello, Thomasthomsen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Esbjerg Dentallaboratorium, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Esbjerg Dentallaboratorium


A tag has been placed on Esbjerg Dentallaboratorium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * If you own the site from which the text was taken from, you may want to change the license terms on that page of the website to make clear that the text is under Creative Commons or a similar free license, which allows free derivative use of the text, including commercial re-use. Make sure you want to give the website's text away before you do that, obviously.


 * Even if the text is under a free license, once it's uploaded to Wikipedia, other editors can and will edit the text mercilessly. Expect for it to be changed, condensed, reworded, expanded, have additional reliable sources added, etc. On the flip side, also prepare for it to be nominated for deletion if it's not clear that the subject meets Wikipedia's notability and verifiability guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 18:55, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Esbjerg Dentallaboratorium


A tag has been placed on Esbjerg Dentallaboratorium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  18:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Please continue to discuss the article, either at Talk:Esbjerg Dentallaboratorium or here, but please do not create blank articles with just a hang on tag. Do feel free to create a new version of the article that: 1) is written in text that is freely licensed; 2) is written in English; 3) is written in a neutral, non-promtional tone; and 4) clearly asserts that the company is a significant or important company. —C.Fred (talk) 19:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Esbjerg Dentallaboratorium


A tag has been placed on Esbjerg Dentallaboratorium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * It looks like the deletion was because item 4) I mentioned above was not done. Per the logs, it was deleted for failing to assert the significance or importance of the company (speedy deletion criterion A7). It was probably done in by the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources, since the only links in the article were to the company's website and what appears to be its corporate registration info (which showed a different date of formation than the article asserted). —C.Fred (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)