User talk:Thomkohler

Thomkohler, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

Reverted your edits at Divine Spark
Thom,

I appreciate the hard work you put into the Divine Spark article. However, the material was not suitable for an encyclopedia article and I've reverted the article back to an earlier version. If you want to summarize material found in reliable sources, you need to make sure they are actually discussing (as opposed to just mentioning) "divine spark". It's not clear to me that the phrase is a term of art that has received scholarly attention, so (as we're not a dictionary) the article will probably be deleted. If you do know of appropriate sources, I'd be happy to discuss them with you to make sure your efforts don't go for naught.

Best,

Garamond Lethe t c  02:48, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Concerns regarding the legitimacy of user: Garamond Lethe
I am sorry Garamond,

the reasoning for your revisions is unclear and does not demonstrate an understanding of the article. I, would be more than pleased to discuss the plurality of scholarly sources which are cited throughout the texts. When an article or phrase is not clear to you personally it does not indicate an error on the part of others. By your writing,"If you do know of appropriate sources...", you have shown that you have not either a.) read the article or b.) have not investigated the sources. Please do not take a well-revised and researched article back to a primitive stub which provides scant information for the public.

- Thomas F. Kohler