User talk:Thomp4ju

Welcome!
Hello, Thomp4ju, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Special enforcement measures apply to blockchain and cryptocurrency related content
Hello, Thomp4ju. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Your edits to Stellar (payment network) are sanctionable for being promotional and poorly sourced. Cryptocurrency enthusiast websites are not reliable sources. Consider this your only warning. MER-C 19:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Editing, and the topic you chose
Hi Thimp4ju, this edit was not OK on many, many levels.

Also, the topic of blockchain/cytpocurrencies is somewhat "dangerous" per the notice above; it is probably unwise for you to work on it.

User:Shalor (Wiki Ed) would you please have a look at what is going on here, as well? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 15:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for alerting me to this ! Thimp4ju, here are the reasons the changes were most likely reverted:
 * The addition messed with the formatting of the article and didn't follow Wikipedia's style guidelines - for example, any new information meant to be in the infobox should be added to the existing infobox and the lead should not be under a header.
 * There were no sources that backed up the claims in the article, which are absolutely necessary for any article but especially for controversial topics like blockchains and cryptocurrencies because things can be so contentious. It looks like there were some sources in your sandbox, so it looks like they weren't copied over when you moved your work live - to make sure that they're copied over properly both pages should be open in edit mode.
 * The addition of several new subsections chopped up the article a little too much - in most cases there only needs to be a very general overview of a company's partnerships unless there is a lot of coverage in independent, reliable sources about the details of the partnership. A lot of coverage over partnerships tends to be a little routine and heavily based on press releases or official statements from one or both companies, so make sure that the coverage is pretty extensive.
 * Keep in mind that if you remove or change something, it needs to be justifiable, especially if you are removing a lot of sources. In your sandbox draft you use very few sources as compared to the existing article, so you need to be able to justify why the article should have fewer sources or why a source should be removed. The same thing goes for claims that are altered or removed.
 * Make sure that all of the content is as neutral as possible. It should not come across as promotional. This can take a while to get used to since what may be seen as not as much of an issue in normal conversation or in academic papers can be promotional and non-neutral on Wikipedia. This is because while it's generally OK and sometimes even strongly encouraged to be non-neutral in these areas, Wikipedia shouldn't come across as taking a specific side or viewpoint.
 * I think that this covers some of the most general issues. I know that the class is ending, but if you do return and want to edit the article, I would recommend starting by making small changes to the existing article as opposed to possibly changing it wholesale. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)


 * As far as how this is more of an issue with a controversial topic, this is because as stated above, controversial topics are often contentious and frequently debated as to how it should be covered and who to cite - even on Wikipedia. Some of these can get pretty extensive, so there's an extra strong emphasis on bringing your A game and ensuring that the material is as neutral as possible, written and formatted to fit style guidelines, and cited by the best/strongest possible sources. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)