User talk:Thompsonbrt/sandbox

Article Evaluation

History of Criminal Justice

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Background is hard to follow and doesn't bring their point around well enough.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? No. More pictures could be added.

What else could be improved? Modern policing can be updated to include the 21st century.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? They work and are supported.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? All the information seems to be credible sources

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Links were modified.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is not rated. No.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It follow what was taught.

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Why is there nothing after the 1990's? Thompsonbrt (talk) 16:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)