User talk:Thonhn0943/sandbox

Peer review General info Thonhno943 Link Valachi hearings Lead Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes, changed Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? no change Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? no Lead evaluation - Good, maybe add in a section about him being a made-man to the section of the overview and add in why him being the first initiated member that testified was important - (just wondering if it would be impactful) Content Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? - no large portions of content added, large portion added to lead Content evaluation - When reading the unedited article it mentioned RFK which I am guessing is Robert Kennedy you could also add who he is for the main article so people who don't know the acronym can relate it to President Kennedy being assisnated Tone and Balance Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? what was added was neutral Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no heavily biased claims Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? n/a Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no Tone and balance evaluation - What was added seemed balanced and non biased Organization Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? none in added portion that I could see Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes, could add more to entire section like you said if available Overall impressions Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes, not complete article What are the strengths of the content added? added more to lead that helped understand importance of article How can the content added be improved? add more to entire article if available Overall evaluation - Really interesting article! Continue to add more - seems interesting and can be expanded upon