User talk:Thor316

August 2019
Hello, I'm Ixocactus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cognizant have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Ixocactus (talk) 20:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

No need of defaming a company's image intentionally
This section seem to have been deployed by a business competitor and hence, it's defaming and false. Hence, needs to be removed from Wikipedia.

This is potentially placed to harm the company's image and it's business

Why don't you put such controversial articles on other it companies such as Accenture, IBM, etc...??

It seems that you belong to a competitor I'm not sure of.

However, such controversial sections are only meant to hurt any given company's image

There are odds in every company and they need not to be mentioned on Wikipedia. Thor316 (talk) 02:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Cognizant. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Sak ura Cart elet Talk 02:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by removing well-sourced, albeit negative, POVs from articles, as you did at Cognizant, you may be blocked from editing. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 03:04, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC) <!-- Template:Uw-nothereblock --

That doesn't even matters or affects me in any single way you piece of

SH i t = ad orentem