User talk:Thorseth

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 00:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hi, Thorseth@fys.ku.dk, and Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, using your e-mail address as your username is not a good idea. Wikipedia content is extensively copied and the site itself is one of the most visited sites in the world. Any edit you make on Wikipedia will have your username attached to it, and using your email address will make you a tempting target for spammers. We recommend that you change your username at Changing username in order to prevent abuse, or simply create a new account. &mdash; Canderous Ordo 10:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Old friend
 * Calling the previous edit this username is not acceptable is perhaps a bit hard. Any spam you'll get as a result of it is really just your own problem. I would settle for your username is hardly recommendable.
 * All the best,
 * Christian Aastrup 05:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Not at all
My pleasure, my friend! The Ogre (talk) 18:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

LED Christmas lights
I have deleted this article because it was a cut and paste of a section from another Wikipedia article but the source was unattributed which is a violation of GFDL. It is also a fork which should probably be discussed on the main article talk page first, particularly as there is very little to say about the specific application of LED at Christmas. All the best for 2009, Nancy  talk  15:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, I guess I was a bit quick there. Ill be discussing the change with the other LED editors and see what happens... --Thorseth (talk) 15:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mobile phone flashing labels
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mobile phone flashing labels, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable cell phone accessory

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Dougofborg(talk) 12:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

WP:Astronomy importance ratings
Looks like someone (RJHall) is on a crusade here. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 19:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Well it doesn't look that bad, I guess light pollution was a mistake --Thorseth (talk) 10:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * At first I though he had a very dim view to amateur astronomy and a very exclusive view for professional astronomy (granted, there's considerable overlap in opinions of importance, still), but turns out he wasn't steadfastly for his WP:Astro importance rating wording changes after all, so okay, never mind. The wording is better now. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 23:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Not everyone should agree whats the best and whats not the best here grow up for christs sake msan \ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.110.86.102 (talk) 19:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, one of the ideas behind wikipedia is to achieve a consensus, but I guess you have a point. --Thorseth (talk) 20:09, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Woops
Woops, must have been looking at a different article. I'm still not sure whether its required though, current says "As an advisory to editors, the template may optionally be used in those occasions that many editors (perhaps a hundred or more) edit an article on the same day, for example, in the case of natural disasters, the death of celebrities, or other breaking news". I don't really think this is the case even if it is an ongoing event. Smartse (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Update the High Line map?
Hi there! I notice you've contributed File:West_side_line.png through Phase 1. The map on OpenStreetMap.org has been updated to indicate that Phase 2 is now open - any chance you could update the static copy here, too? Thanks! -Etoile ✩ (talk) 06:57, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Danish modern
Just noticed that you proposed combining this article with Danish design. I can understand why as the Danish modern article was indeed very brief at the time but I think it could usefully expanded in its own right. After all, there is much that could be added on the history of furniture design in the 1950s and 1960s, and indeed on the continued popularity of many of the items. I have starded to embark on this track myself. The next time I am in Denmark, I will try to obtain relevant literature from the library. - Ipigott (talk) 09:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, no problem. You could start by adding images, there seem to be allot of them under the linked designer names. --Thorseth (talk) 10:40, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks for beating me to it! Now working on contributions of the major players. - Ipigott (talk) 11:08, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

LED Graph
Hello Thorseth

I'm sketching out an updated graph of $/klm and Lumens/Package. Can you share with me where you got your data for the graph you made?

Mrshaba (talk) 19:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Right on... Thanks for the advice. Mrshaba (talk) 21:03, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Light-emitting diode, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Focus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

keywords parameter
Hi Thorseth, regarding, the Cite journal template does not support the keywords parameter. If there's no equivalent, it should either be removed or implemented. --Chealer (talk) 23:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Map for the High Line (New York City) article
Hello. Three years ago, you uploaded a map for the article High Line (New York City). Would you mind updating it? The High Line's third phase is opening this weekend. Thank you, Epicgenius (talk) 02:51, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

I am sorry, I dont´t think ill have the time to do that--Thorseth (talk) 08:16, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Borchs Kollegium has been nominated for merging
Category:Borchs Kollegium has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:55, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Important notice: post-1992 American politics
--Sangdeboeuf (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Intersectionality
Greetings. The "Intersectionality" chapter by HoSang cited in the lead is a WP:SECONDARY/WP:TERTIARY source and discusses boththe DeGraffenreid case and Crenshaw's analysis of it. There is no need to the court ruling itself, which is a WP:PRIMARY source and should be used with caution. Thank you. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, I can understand you point, but I don't understand 1) why you keep reintroducing the dead links to the case, that is currently mentioned in two places in the text. Clearly, this case is of importance here, and 2) the discussion of the case is made quite factual. It seems to me that talking in a factual manner about a case that is then used to argue for a specific theoretical view point would need to have to have some information about that subject - not seen from that specific theoretical view point. And I have to say, it seems to me that the HoSang essay is made from the same theoretical stand point as the one it is describing. Thorseth (talk) 21:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:REDLINKS are valid if the subject could have an article written about it someday. The HoSang chapter is factual regarding the court case and Crenshaw's analysis of it. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:43, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)