User talk:Thoughts77

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Ragib 30 June 2005 06:09 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Sheehan article
Hello and thanks for the comments. I believe that most of the chronology items you removed provided important context for Sheehan's actions. She is literally a "reactionary," reacting against President George W. Bush and his war policies, and thus events like his vacation and conduct are of importance. Sheehan seems to have chosen the (originally planned to be 5 week) vacation very carefully to stage her protest. Purging mention of Bush's reactions to the protest is ill-considered, especially in light of the hard, consistent work many editors have put into this article over the past weeks. Badagnani 20:13, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * This entry is for organizational purposes. You can find my response to the above here, on Badagnani's talk page, dated 20:37 September 28th, 2005.
 * Thought 20:40, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

One needs to be very judicious in removing large amounts of text from Wikipedia articles, especially one that has been edited so thoroughly (50+ edits per day for many days), a consensus having been built during that time. We all have our own personal points of view but we do not let these get in the way of our editing. Yours seems apparent from your (surprising) statement that Sheehan is not a significant member of the anti-war movement. We all, also, have our own personal views about what is important (or contextual) and what is not. Yours have been stated particularly strongly, but please be aware that others may not agree that a chronology item is not relevant.

The crux of the matter: there is no single website except the Sheehan page, built "brick by brick" over time, that includes a comprehensive synopsis of all major events in the chronology. To respond to some of your finer points: celebrity and politicians' appearances are significant, as few had publicly demonstrated against the Iraq war (though some may have been privately anti-war). The boots reference is a link to another national anti-war tour, and thus has significance. All of the chronology items add context, even the Sharpton motofcade reference, which I did not feel was crucial as it reflected on Sharpton rather than Sheehan, but I felt it was fair to leave it in as it's part of the overall "story." Originally, your first joking exchanges with other editors about there being too many extraneous chronology items tended to undermine your seriousness, but I do believe you have the best intentions in mind. Just be aware that the chronology has been constructed with great care, and many extraneous items have indeed already been thrown out along the way, by consensus. Badagnani 21:36, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * This entry is for organizational purposes. You can find my response to the above here, on Badagnani's talk page, dated 04:31, September 30th, 2005.
 * Thought 04:33, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

This time you were rude, and that is never nice. I did of course check that photo page and saw the credit but thought the anon IP may have put that name there to match the photo credit. The anon edit adding photo credit, as you noticed, was uncommented and we have had problems for many, many weeks with dozens if not hundreds of edits from anon IPs, almost all of which are vandalism or otherwise bad edits. The Sheehan article is a sensitive one; everyone seems to have an agenda or want to add or delete things for the wrong reasons. So we have to be very watchful for anon IPs, esp. those who don't comment on their edits (they usually don't). In future, can you be nicer? I promise to do so as well. Badagnani 01:05, 6 October 2005 (UTC)


 * This entry is for organizational purposes. You can find my response to the above here, on Badagnani's talk page, dated 06:56, October 6th, 2005.
 * Thought 06:59, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Yes, the closing paragraph. With thousands of edits under our belts everyone makes a bad one from time to time. I (maybe unlike others here) am not unwilling to admit that I have been incorrect about something. However, one should maintain a spirit of cordiality here which is unfortunately often lacking in society. I hope you agree. Badagnani 07:02, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

I support you
(I think.) I noticed your comment on Talk:Petals_around_the_rose_solution. User:Xmnemonic
 * This entry is for organizational purposes. You can find my response to the above here, on Xmnemonic's talk page, dated dated 20:02, October 17th, 2005.
 * Thought 20:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Megaman Battle Networks Chip List
This is meant as a continuation of a comment you left over at Hibana's discussion page. It seemed more logical to address the issue here rather than on his page.

Specifically, colour me confused. I have no idea what you mean by "Furthurmore, I was the one who had reverted in the past when you made the list, concerning its "messiness", which you did, indeed correct." Looking at my last edit to the topic (Oct 14th) the only list was one of the game specific NetNavis. Is this the one you are referring to? Or are you, perhaps, referring to anon 68.197.30.16's list (which seems more likely, but again I am not sure). But leaving my general confusion behind, for the moment, I fully agree (as, it appears, you do too) that the chip lists shouldn't be contained on Wikipedia (see MegaMan BN 1's Talk Page for an example). Anyways, since you are around the articles fairly often I am sure I will be seeing you. Thought 23:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * My deepest apologies. I (wrongly) assumed that you were previously anon 68.197.30.16! Please forgive me. :) Anywho, I'm very glad we share a common opinion on this subject, and I hope you like my edits to the article. Finally, like other newcommers who share a love of Megaman, I welcome you to corect edits and make articles, and I'm glad to find another wikipedian who loves Megaman as much as I do. I hope you stay in Wkipedia and continue to make and edit articles, regarding the subject, and please don't hesitate to talk to me on my talkpage. Regards, MegamanZero 2:18 6,December 2005 (UTC)


 * ecuse me But in that chip list is there an X Code anywhere? Anonymous User


 * Sorry, but I have no idea what an X Code is. Perhaps you are thinking about one of the other Megaman games? Thought 20:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

McK
I dont know what you mean re "see talk"; as far as I can tell the corrigendum doesn't affect the results because... it didn't. The results are as before. As to *why* M&M's submission was rejected... we don't know - we have only their word on it, which is not good enough William M. Connolley 22:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Thought. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Thought~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 03:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)