User talk:Thparkth/Archives/2011/January

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:27, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

You can edit
Just leave it for abit. Has some consensus. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The only formal attempt to gain consensus I can see had exactly two editors supporting it. Several experienced editors have objected at a fundamental nature to the concept of the template, and their objections have not been addressed in any substantive way. Meanwhile the protagonists blithely wonder if they might double the length of the trial, without seeking any wider discussion. Thparkth (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Seven people out of twelve in that conversation spoke in support of a trial. Three were non committal and the other two were skeptical of the proposal's merits but did not oppose a trial. If there is support on the project talk page for extending the length of the trial, we'll put it to the community. First, let's see if there is support for an extended trial at the project talk page. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 14:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Has that bug on mobiles been fixed, Thparkth? See Pain. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not responding so far, I've been ill for the last day or so with a weird cold of some kind... I've felt like my head was filled with glue and not trusted my judgement one bit, so I've refrained from commenting. Will do so not. Thparkth (talk) 12:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries. By the way, it's a genuine pleasure working with you. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 13:18, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for despeedying
(Does it even matter for ? Sounds like you do this enough...)

But what I really wanted to say is I enjoyed reading your user page -- especially the banner at the top, which made me think: "AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD? Sounds like something Pterry would make up"—and then I saw the origin of your name... .

So, yeah. Thanks!--NapoliRoma (talk) 06:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Crowswing Books
You're late — I already realised it :-) After I deleted the article, I followed my usual procedure of reading the talk page before deleting it, and I found a notice there about the AFD.  I vaguely remember seeing somewhere in policy about not speedying articles that survived AFDs (aside from copyvios, office actions, etc.), and even if that memory be faulty, I agree with you that it's a very bad idea to speedy an article that survived AFD.  For that reason, I restored the article.  Thanks for the notice! Nyttend (talk) 02:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the compliments :-) On a different note, what do you think about having a second AFD?  I really don't think that it would survive a second one, or that it should survive a second one, for that matter.  Nyttend (talk) 02:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)