User talk:Thrashon

Attribution for opinions
General opinions about bikes like the Ducati Desmosedici and Suzuki GSX-RR are fine but only if you can cite a reliable source, and include in-text attribution naming which recognized expert you're getting these opinions from. If a bike is "widely seen" as the most and the best, then that means it ought to be easy to name many such sources. That's what "widely seen" means. Aside from opinions, focusing on facts is even more appropriate for an encyclopedia, as explained at MOS:PUFFERY. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Writing personal commentary on 2021 racing season
Echoing the advice in the section above, please don't editorialise your own thoughts at Fabio Quartararo when the season has just begun by creating a new section and content. Encyclopedia content should only be based on published accounts and these should be cited. WP:COMMENTARY, WP:EDITORIAL and Help:Referencing for beginners will give guidance. Thank you.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 01:54, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, you are writing-in your own personal commentary without the necessary accreditation at Fabio Quartararo. You have been given guidance that you are ignoring. Please stop adding your own commentary and find independent sources. You got the commentary wrong as he didn't lead from the start.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joan Mir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Miller. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Fabio Quartararo does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! --Rocknrollmancer (talk) 01:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Hopkins (motorcyclist), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also at Francesco Bagnaia.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:59, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Romain Grosjean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Harvey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Herta
Stop reverting my edits. My edits are correct per the entry lists. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 23:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Franco Morbidelli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Romain Febvre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kawasaki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Engr. Smitty. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Toprak Razgatlıoğlu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. '''Engr. Smitty  Werben''' 14:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mil Mi-24, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also please stop removing valid cite needed tags. -Fnlayson (talk) 14:53, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2022 IndyCar Series. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. At no point in your cited article does Hunter-Reay say he is retiring. You have repeatedly added this false information to the article. Please stop. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 21:08, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

IndyCar teams table
If the team has not acknowledged a signing, do not add it to the table. Your edits have been, once again, reverted. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 12:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Please always use edit summaries
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! 208.103.240.156 (talk) 13:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Unsourced content/original research
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Juncos Hollinger Racing
 * added a link pointing to Carlin
 * Kyle Kaiser
 * added a link pointing to Carlin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mil Mi-24. BilCat (talk) 04:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nico Hülkenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ed Carpenter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Carlin Motorsport. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 18:54, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Toprak Razgatlıoğlu. '''Engr. Smitty  Werben''' 18:05, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Please ENGAGE.
Hi. I'd like to point out to you that on Wikipedia, Communication is required. I've noticed that you have not made any edits to talkspace or usertalk space. You have multiple editors who have come to you about problems with your editing and you've made no indication that you've even read any of them. I see you make plenty of good edits and I'd hate to see an admin see this talk page after coming across an edit such as what you made at Carlin Motorsport and block you for it, or for someone to make a complaint at WP:ANI. I see you as a net-positive to the website, but please stop jumping the gun on rumours such as a potential Carlin/Juncos-Hollinger merger until a website such as RACER, IndyStar or Motorsport Network cover it. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 19:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Blocked 36 hours; persistent POV, WP:SYNTH, failure to communicate
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Final warning before longer block WP:NOR, WP:SYNTH
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at T-90. ''I was going to give a gentle warning, until I saw that this appears to be a chronic issue with your editing. Please include citations that supports the content you add.'' TylerBurden (talk) 20:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shane Steichen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Richardson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)