User talk:Three Musketeers

Speedy delete
How can you say I am a non-existent user? I am here! Only created the account recently, will start editing soon. Three Musketeers 16:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's my userpage, I can put what I want on it. User page says "Some people add information about themselves as well, possibly including contact information (email, instant messaging, etc), a photograph, their real name, their location, information about their areas of expertise and interest, likes and dislikes, homepages, and so forth. (If you are concerned with privacy, you may not want to and are by no means required to emulate this.)" which I have done. Three Musketeers 16:58, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Mmmm, strange one. I thought long and hard about nominating a user page - for whatever reason. Yes, your right, I guess, people can do pretty much what they like to their own user page – I say ‘pretty much’, because there are, I’m sure, lots of things that you are not allowed to do – but what is in your page is definitely not one of those things.


 * I decided (very possibly wrongly) that your user page was a subtle/?artistic? form of vandalism (just because I nominated it for deletion, doesn’t mean I didn’t find it interesting – some New York subway graffiti is very impressive, but it’s still vandalism).


 * “How can you say I am a non-existent user?”


 * sigh - I know, what a reason to pick!


 * I only decided on that one whilst looking down the list of reasons. I was hoping there would be an “Other reason: please state your reason in the following box” type option at the bottom of the list, alas no. It seemed to me that you were not a ‘real’ user - in some sense of the word at least. You had, and still have (at the time of typing this (which is taking me ages - between guisers/trick-or-treaters at the door), made no other contributions to articles other than your user page – which isn’t an article).


 * I immediately rejected User:KieferSkunk’s preferred deletion reason of patent nonsense as I would argue that patent nonsense to be something a bit like ‘kakamoondy&%$)ndfmalfkd_ilovedish_fl9u49orlfljroo8y+(_**^bliblibli’ - I wonder if some bot will get upset by that and revert this edit. Your text is more akin to a page that might be found in Trainspotting or Last Exit to Brooklyn.


 * Anyway, looks like someone called Erica has decided what’s best. It’s somewhat disappointing that she neglects to explain her opinion, even though another administrator and I both made a delete nomination. Regards, Mannafredo 08:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for such a great response! One of the best I have read on here. I hope your 'trick-or-treaters at the door' didn't disrupt your Wikipedia edits too much! Thanks for the response, regards, Three Musketeers 10:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Blame ambiguity in speedy-delete criteria for my nomination. It looked like this user page was either blatant nonsense or a copy of another page, or something along those lines, and it was difficult to discern if there was any real content here.  Keep in mind that User pages are about you as a Wikipedian, not a personal hosting service - that's why I nominated the page for delete.  But that's as far as I was willing to go with it. &mdash; KieferSkunk (talk) &mdash; 14:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, speedy-delete criteria could be better, and you make a very good point regarding Wikipedia not being a hosting service. However, lots of people have personal stuff on their user page, and it's not worth getting upset about. I'm with you in not wanting to go any further with this, and I hereby take back my nomination for deletion. It has raised some mildly interesting questions though - that's good. Regards to you both. Mannafredo 15:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * In general, the speedy-delete criteria really could use some work. I'm going to start raising some questions there. &mdash; KieferSkunk (talk) &mdash; 18:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Three Musketeers
A tag has been placed on User:Three Musketeers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.&mdash; KieferSkunk (talk) &mdash; 16:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome! Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!  SilkTork  *What's YOUR point? 13:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Your User Page
Hi Three Musketeers! I note that your user page has already attracted attention. It's worth reading User_page, particularly User_page. Your contributions Special:Contributions/Three_Musketeers indicate that you haven't moved much beyond your user page as yet. I would encourage you to get involved with editing Wikipedia - be bold and make an edit to an article. Once you start you'll find it's quite easy. And don't worry about damaging Wiki - all edits can be undone, so if you make a mistake someone will soon put it right. I would also ask you to reflect on your User Page and consider that the main interaction you are getting from other Wiki users is in relation to a concern that you may be using Wikipedia inappropriately because of your User Page. You might consider putting something more helpful on that page, or simply blanking it to prevent getting any further negative attention. Regards  SilkTork  *What's YOUR point? 13:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

RFA Vandalism
Stop this now or you will be blocked. You cannot remove the comments of users opposing you in your own RfA and insert ridiculous comments. alphachimp 16:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You have been blocked for 3 hours for your recent vandalism to my usertalk and your RfA modifications. alphachimp  16:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Oxymoron83 10:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Your block has been extended: You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Three Musketeers for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. [ジャム] [talk] 19:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)