User talk:Threehundredeight

Nomination of Robert Mortimer Montgomery for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Mortimer Montgomery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robert Mortimer Montgomery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Election result tables
When editing election result tables (such as those on UK constituency pages), please have regard to the agreed format (as per the discussion on the UK politics Wikiproject page). Names of candidates that link to other WP articles should be in the Commonname format, reflecting the title of the linked article page. Honorifics and other titles should not be added. Red-listed names should be in the appropriate format for the prospective page. Thanks in anticipation of your co-operation and understanding. MapReader (talk) 12:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

File:1885-1918 Skipton.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1885-1918 Skipton.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

File:1885-1918 Eccles.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1885-1918 Eccles.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 11:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC) In light of the decision on the Skipton file above there is no alternative but to nominate this file and a further 68 for deletion on the same grounds. I still consider that you are misunderstanding the copyright situation and by creating modified images from the out of copyright material you have created the new works yourself. You can licence them as such using a CC-by-SA licence or forego copyright altogether by use of PD-self but they are not accurate reproductions of the original maps so PD-1923 is not applicable. Nthep (talk) 11:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Robert Ian Aonas MacInnes) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Robert Ian Aonas MacInnes, Threehundredeight!

Wikipedia editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thank you for contribution."

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 00:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Kenyon Vaughan-Morgan.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:1929 Eric Long.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Richard Briscoe.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:1928 Richard Reiss.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Watson Rutherford.jpg


The file File:Watson Rutherford.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Since we know both the photographer and the publication dates, this image is unquestionably safe on Commons as c:File:Watson Rutherford.jpg. Unless OP has an additional objection to render, we can delete the local version."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If you wish to see the deletion of this page, please open a deletion discussion so that it will be more likely that this issue will be discussed by just you and I. Threehundredeight (talk) 05:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Watson Rutherford.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Watson Rutherford.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Watson Rutherford.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Watson Rutherford.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Beta Hornabrook moved to draftspace
Currently, there is not enough information in your references for editors to ascertain the veracity of the article. Please take a look at WP:CIT and WP:CITE, on what should be included in references/footnotes. After you correct the references, and when you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or simply "move" the article yourself.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Arthur Griffith-Boscawen.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Arthur Griffith-Boscawen.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AlbanGeller (talk) 23:55, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Percy Coleman Simmons.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Percy Coleman Simmons.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AlbanGeller (talk) 00:56, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Beta Hornabrook concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Beta Hornabrook, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Muriel Morgan Gibbon concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Muriel Morgan Gibbon, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Beta Hornabrook


Hello, Threehundredeight. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beta Hornabrook".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 14:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Muriel Morgan Gibbon has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Muriel Morgan Gibbon. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 00:13, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Muriel Morgan Gibbon


Hello, Threehundredeight. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muriel Morgan Gibbon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

File:1916 Gilbert Murray.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1916 Gilbert Murray.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)