User talk:Throsby2914

November 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ali Ahmad Khan has been reverted. Your edit here to Ali Ahmad Khan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.royalark.net/Afghanistan/barak13.htm) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Shaghasi
Wikipedia works on ”verifiability, not truth” as a guiding principle. This policy states that “Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. That we have rules for the inclusion of material does not mean Wikipedians have no respect for truth and accuracy, just as a court's reliance on rules of evidence does not mean the court does not respect truth. Wikipedia values accuracy, but it requires verifiability.” In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. Best regards, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring
It would seem now that you are edit warring. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. I hope you will please read through all the guidelines I have provided. Thanks. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi there, I have already provided one reliable source, and was planning to add more references in the near future. Although the source was not published source in English, it was a reliable published source in Dari/Farsi language. However, I don't understand the reason for the "undoing" of my edits!? Throsby2914 (talk) 03:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Shaghasi moved to draftspace
Unfortunately, an article you recently created Shaghasi, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the " " button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 08:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear M. Shraf333,
 * I don't see the logic behind this! As previously indicated, I have already provided one reliable source, and was planning to add more references in the near future. Although the source was not published source in English, it was a reliable published source in Dari/Farsi language.
 * Could you please clarity the actual reason behind the edits to my page being "undone" and my page "not ready as written to remain publish"? As this is highly disencouraging!? Throsby2914 (talk) 18:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shaghasi (March 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praseodymium-141 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shaghasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shaghasi Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praseodymium-141&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Shaghasi reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 141 Pr  {{{sup|contribs}}/Best page} 08:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Shaghasi moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Shaghasi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shaghasi has been accepted
 Shaghasi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Shaghasi help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  EmeraldRange  (talk/contribs) 12:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)