User talk:Through Blue

November 2008
Genealogy is of value when it contributes to the article: being accurate, verifiable, and relevant. I have been removing genealogy that is not. This is not WP:Vandalism. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If you have an issue about a particular edit, that is what Talk pages are for. Agricolae (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Blanking to damage a page is vandalism. Removing irrelevant nonsense is not.  You may not agree with the edit, but dismissing it as vandalism is not legitimate. Agricolae (talk) 21:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Ingelger
Of your three references, one is over 150 years old and the other two don't have the information on the stated pages, at least in the editions I found on line. That is not verification. They were all written before either of us were born, ignoring the fact that scholarship has progressed. For a scholarly analysis of the origin of the Angevins see:

http://sbaldw.home.mindspring.com/hproject/prov/fulk0001.htm

While a web page, this is a peer reviewed analysis of the issue, formally published on line and written by a Fellow of the American Society of Genealogists, and as such represents verifiable expert information regarding the state of the evidence. Note particularly "The name of Foulques's father is confirmed by a charter of 929 [Cart. S.-Aubin 1: 203-4 (see below)], but nothing else is known about him."

Christian Settipani also addresses it, again dismissing the earliest information as legend.

Christian Settipani, "Les comtes d'Anjou et leur alliances aux Xe et XIe siècles", in K. S. B. Keats-Rohan, ed., Family Trees and the Roots of Politics (Woodbridge, Suffolk, 1997): 211-267.

Also an analysis by Cawley, placed online by the Foundation for Medieval Genealogy, dismisses the Charlemagne link, as do two scholarly analyses of the descendants of Charlemagne, by Werner and Brandenberg.

And that is just what I have on my bookshelf. Agricolae (talk) 21:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

AN Notice
A thread has been started about you here. Regards, Kafka Liz (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
__NOINDEX__ [see ]Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 11:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012
 In this issue...   - Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
 * From the Editor
 * What are You doing For Lent?
 * Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
 * Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

WP:Anglican navbox colour discussion
Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. DBD 19:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus
Hello, I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.-- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 21:00, 17 May 2013 (UTC)