User talk:Thrusound09

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Misstress Barbara has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/MisstressBarbara. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:45, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Austin leeds


A tag has been placed on Austin leeds, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Coped from Talk:Austin leeds
This information on Austin Leeds comes directly from his official biography. I am also, his manager. Please advise as to how I can make the page acceptable for wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrusound09 (talk • contribs) 28 February 2011
 * Please read the notice on top of the article. It says that the article does not claim the significance of the subject. In order for an article to remain on Wikipedia, the article subject must meet the notability guidelines for inclusion at WP:N. Specifically, this individual must meet the guidelines for musician or band biographies, which can be found at WP:MUSICBIO.
 * The deletion tag also states that the article exists solely to promote this person. All Wikipedia articles must be written from neutral point of view. It is one of the core content policies. Phrases such as "It wasn’t long before Leeds' music had found spots in the record bags of DJ heavyweights..." and "Austin's uncompromising outlook in the studio has driven him to produce hits..." impart promotion. You have also declared (and thank you for doing so) that you have a conflict of interest. Although you are not expressly prohibited from creating and/or editing an article on a subject with which you have a conflict of interest, you are strongly discouraged from doing so because in general, editors with conflict of interest have difficulty maintaining neutral point of view.
 * Notwithstanding all of that, per another core content policy of verifiability, all articles must be referenced to external, reliable sources independent of the subject. The fact that you are his manager and can vouch for the information is irrelevant; this constitutes original research, which is a violation of the other core content policy.
 * The tag you placed on the article has bought you some time. If you can edit the article to meet these criteria, an administrator (who ultimately has responsibility for whether this article ends up getting deleted) may disagree with my rationale for deletion and decline the deletion nomination. If it does get deleted, I recommend checking Alternative outlets for a listing of sites using wiki technology that may be willing and able to host your content. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

I will go back and edit the information listed in the article in terms of making it a neutral point of view — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrusound09 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Please do not edit the article as doing so is a clear conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not to be used as a means of promoting an individual or entity; if Austin Leeds is notable enough, an uninvolved editor will eventually create an article on him. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  19:52, 28 February 2011 (UTC)