User talk:Thuban541

Rangerplex
I have removed the bulk of your article on Rangerplex as it was a direct copy from American Broadcasting Company. I assume that the reason you copied the article was to have a basic format to work with, which isn't a completely bad idea. However, as this article is part of the main namespace, it is feasible that someone might come along to read this article and become very confused or worse... not confused at all. In the future, if you intend to put up a "test" version of an article, it's recommended that you use the Sandbox. Thanks! JPG-GR 06:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Additionally, you may want to take a look at WP:NPOV (and, the rest of the Manual Of Style, if you're feeling daring). The introduction paragraph contains some weaselly words and it's probably best to nip those in the bud early on, so to speak. Thanks again! JPG-GR 06:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Rangerplex
I have added a "" template to the article Rangerplex, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. JPG-GR 02:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of RAWNet
An editor has nominated RAWNet, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 13:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)