User talk:Thundermaster/Archive 1

Scrubs
Thanks for your interest in the Scrubs tv show. I also love the show and I'm happy that JD and Elliot might get back together based on the season 6 finale. However, despite my enjoyment of the show, I'd like to request that you don't redirect Scrubs to Scrubs (TV series); the page is currently functioning according to Wikipedia policy. --NormanEinstein 13:23, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Music in Scrubs
Just thought you might want to know, the article Music in Scrubs, which you created, has been put up on Articles for Deletion. If you wish to comment, you can do so on its nomination page. --Gpollock 05:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Extreme metal
Template:Extreme metal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Kameejl (Talk) 12:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I couldn't find the second nomination. Have you got a link to the TfD page? I'm just curious... you're the one who made the template, right? Why would you like to delete it? Kameejl (Talk) 15:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Grim 05:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool. Right on. Grim 19:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Fear Factory
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Rehevkor (talk) 16:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

extreme metal template
You added genres that don't exist, and Gothic metal is not extreme metal at all, so I did the honour of removing them for you.

also, metalcore is barely metal, let alone extreme metal. 24.139.31.210 (talk) 00:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


 * just because black is your girlfriend, doesn't mean that you can make it impossible to see the edit/view/discuss links. DragonDance (talk) 15:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Civility and WP:NPA
Howdy, Wikipedia can get heated at times. Be sure to not attack other editors and keep focused on improving the encyclopedia. Try to focus on the edits themselves, and keep WP:NPA in mind. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. Thanks, --TeaDrinker (talk) 09:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

One Night Only
A tag has been placed on One Night Only (Indie pop band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PKT (talk) 14:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

lol
i guess we should. DragonDance (talk) 20:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Pages
Why are you creating pages with db-userreq already on them? This is confusing.—Random832 15:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

No big deal - it just seemed a bit odd.—Random832 18:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Template: At The Gates
Actually it wasn't me. It was User:CircafuciX. This is the edit. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 18:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:Extreme metal
I was going to do exactly what you did, but when I tried that with the new navbox template it didn't work. I wasn't sure if I was supposed to go back to the old template that starts with "{[". It was my idea though, I originally took the format from the Neurosis template and replaced it for the At the Gates template above^. --CircafuciX 19:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Yea. Looks alot better now DragonDance 20:31, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I like the new template..it's perfect. Nothing more really needs to be added or taken out.  Blizzard Beast  ''$ODIN' 18:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Fear Factory?
You're joking, right? Unexplained edits? It was discussed in the talk page. Please don't insult me by adding such condescending cap crap to my talk page. If you didn't agree with it you were free to add to the discussion rather than claiming it's unexplained. If you want to be a constructive editor on Wikipedia I recommend some more common sense. Rehevkor (talk) 14:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Punk metal
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kameejl (Talk) 13:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Feist (singer)
I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Dl2000 (talk) 23:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Nu funk
... and funktronica... Good find! This gives us another option. -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 11:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm going to keep searching for some proper sources over the next couple of days. Cheers, -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 11:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, a merge was the other option I was thinking of. But first give me a couple of days to do some searching to see if anything confirms that these are interchangeable terms, or if they are written about as separate music genres. Thanks! -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 11:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

View source
Hey dude, thanks for fixing the redirect I made. I was gonna think where would be the best place to redirect this. Again, thanks. I really appreciate your help. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Denied prod for Eeyore (song)
Hello I have denied the prod for this article, because it has been around since 2005 with dozens of contributors, had an assessment on 4 wikiprojects, and slipknot is non-notable? really? Feel free to list at AfD. JERRY talk contribs 15:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, AfD seems a better avenue than prod for an article that has been around for so long and with so many contributors. JERRY talk contribs 15:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Discussion
I have a silent film strip called the New frontier starring John Wayne based on a Republic film called New Hope. Any idea of the date this was made. There is no reference to this film in the John Wayne film history.

They are asking who owns the copyright for the image of film strip. I don't know as i found the strip in an old box in the attic. I supose it belongs to me? how do i let them know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baritone600 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

View source
Hey dude, thanks for fixing the redirect I made. I was gonna think where would be the best place to redirect this. Again, thanks. I really appreciate your help. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Are you sure you found it on the page with double redirects? Because I'm pretty sure I made a broken one. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 17:11, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Does this look like a double redirect to you? I swear it's a broken one.
 * Bah doesn't matter, thanks any way. I still think you must have been on the list of broken redirects. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:CHU
Needs further response while logged in as User:WelcomeUser. —Random832 18:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * As the user creation log confirms both accounts are yours, I've gone ahead and done the renamea as requested. WjBscribe 01:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject Metal
I have changed my name and I'm still member under my former name. I'll update it. Kameejl (Talk) 12:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikiproject
Yeah I'm still interested, what do you meen you put it in the wrong place anyway? Were where you supposed to put it and were is it? Rezter (talk) 15:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I've joined Riverpeopleinvasion (talk) 18:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Punk metal
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Kameejl (Talk) 01:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Jack here
I got my wikipedia account working :D

Just to say, about this page, Led Zeppelin aren't heavy metal, they're hard rock. User:Bon Ferret

Beregsău River
I don't understand your comments and object to the flagging of the article for deletion. There are no notoriety criteria for rivers. The article is part of the Wikipedia: Rivers project where this has been decided. The issue has been discussed several times since, related to articles on various rivers. There are several thousand articles which are in the same situation. Please state the reasons for which you singled out the Beregsău river.Afil (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

You may be right and you are entitled to your oppinion. However, a decision on this matter has been reached and the article complies to the prevailing rules. This is not the place to raise the issue. For the time being the policy is that there should not be any notoriety criteria for rivers.Afil (talk) 16:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Thundermaster, please be sure that you have read the criteria at WP:CSD so that you are not misapplying speedy tags. Thanks, -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 17:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! Happy editing, -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 17:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Falon
The Band meet the first criterion Ryannus (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * And the 7th. Ryannus (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Numerous newspapers around Northern Ireland. Most recently the Derry Journal, however that is the only reference cited, due to the Derry Journal's Archive being very recent online. There are however a number of references in hard copies, which can be obtained from the Derry Journal Offices on the Buncrana Road in Derry.Ryannus (talk) 17:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Post signed
How very ignorant of you. :)Ryannus (talk) 17:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Dude! Have manners, but ok, I understand. I signed it immediately after I posted it, thank you very much. Ryannus (talk) 17:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Of course, but things like that are irrelevant. Your decision to 'ignore' my post until I signed it was ignorant and false, because you didn't actually ignore it, when you notified me of it. Again it's all irrelevant. Ryannus (talk) 17:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikiproject: Slipknot
I added my name, so I'm good to join it, right? (BTW I'm glad to see that this band is FINALLY getting its own Wikiproject.) Is it even around yet, cuz I can't find the page anywhere. And if it's not around yet, what's taking so long? Respond on my talk page, please. Dark Executioner (talk) 17:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner

CSD:A7
Hi. :) I came across your speedy deletion tag and I just wanted to point out to you that db-a7 is specifically for people (individually or grouped) and websites. There is currently no consensus for speedily deleting other articles types under this criterion. Other articles that fail to assert notability should go through proposed deletion or articles for deletion. Thanks for keeping an eye out on article quality. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
I understand being busy at work, man! But that's great that it's up now! I've put my name, but it doesn't look like my name is alligned right. If you could fix it for me, that'd be cool. BTW, does this project have an infobox? Dark Executioner (talk) 19:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner

Yeah, I jumped at the opportunity to join the project, I've been a member of Wikipedia for a long time and also a longtime editor of the Slipknot page. I was the one who created the article for their 4th full-length album. It was strange how they were trying to delete it at first, but that problem is behind us now. Also wanted to ask if you were interested in helping me start a Wikiproject:Korn or Wikiproject:Pantera. Dark Executioner (talk) 19:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner

How do you start Wikiprojects? Once I know this, you and me can begin working on it! Dark Executioner (talk) 20:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner

We can't force people to join. But, after reading the comments on the Pantera talk page, I saw the point that people like M3tal H3ad were making. Instead of having Pantera's own Wikiproject, we could just make them a part of Wikiproject:Metal, which would probably be an even better deal. Dark Executioner (talk) 12:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner

That sounds like an excellent idea to me. We might actually get more supporters that way. Dark Executioner (talk) 17:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner

Slipknot Project
Thanks man, good work to you too. I thought about starting one before because mainly it's only Slipknot related articles I edit, but because of that I didn't really have enough experience outside of Slipknot to create the project. The progress of WikiProject is good though man, once we get the guidelines up and we have a solid base to work from we can start setting things up like adopt an article or having certain articles the focal point for a few days, setting members tasks. I look forward to it, so yeah let's get it set up fully so we can get a good team together because atm, I'm sure you know that a lot of the Slipknot articles are really bad.  Rezter  TALK  06:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

No I don't know anybody dude, you should look at the history of some Slipknot pages and see who edits regularly and invite them. Seriously dude we need to get these guidelines up and then we can start setting tasks and shit we gotta get the others more productive with this project they haven't really done much to help it get it started.  Rezter  TALK  06:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy nomination of Neso tomic
Hello there!

I nominated the above article for speedy deletion as per WP:CSD and I notice that you changed the nomination reason to WP:CSD which is fine. Quite often I find that when I nominate an inapropriate article for speedy deletion, the author of the article will remove or change the speedy tag because they probably don't know or don't care about Wikipedia policies. That's when I become quick on the trigger to issue a warning to their talk page or report them to the administrators. That's what my initial reaction was when I noticed that my nomination was changed and there was no edit summary. I don't mean to sound rude or condescending but I think it would be really helpful if you could include even the shortest of short edit summaries like, in this case, speedy nom or csd a1. That way, no one has to double check youd edit to make sure you didn't do something you're trying to hide. You've done some really good editing and, clearly, you have nothing to hide in your edits so just try to make sure that the rest of us can see what you've been doing. Thanks. SWik78 (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikiproject Korn - RE
That's what I've been saying. Let's go with putting it under a bigger scope. BTW, how is the Slipknot Wikiproject going? Dark Executioner (talk) 15:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner

Good!Dark Executioner (talk) 15:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner

WP:SLIP - RE
Well one new guy added his name... There's already a notice on the talk page about it... The only thing I can think of is just go to the list of members in Wikiproject:Metal (which I am a proud member of) and leave messages to a bunch of different people asking if they want to join it. IF all else fails, then we could always turn it over to the main Wikiproject:Metal. Dark Executioner (talk) 15:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner

Slipknot AoF
I have created a new task for the Slipknot Project, it's called the Article of Focus. You can see what this task is for and its aims here. The first AoF is Slipknot (album). As you are a member of the project, your participation in this taks is greatly welcomed and the quicker and better that we improve the article the more efficient the project will become.  Rezter  TALK  13:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dark metal
A tag has been placed on Dark metal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Zouavman   Le   Zouave   05:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: The Dark Metal Redirect
Was it a redirect before? I thought it was a proper article. (Respond on my talk please) Thanks for reading, Thundermaster TRUC 08:48, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have seen you created a redirect from Dark metal, and that's fine. Afterwards, someone had edited the page to make it into an article once again. When tagging the article for speedy deletion, the warning has been sent on your talk page. My bad. The redirect was fine, the article isn't. Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards,  Zouavman   Le   Zouave   11:28, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Slipknot AoF Voting
Following the great success of the Slipknot (album) article after receiving the attention of the Slipknot WikiProject's collaborative effort, the "Article of Focus" (read more) voting on the second article to recieve it's attention is now open. The articles nominated to choose from are Voliminal: Inside the Nine and Slipknot discography, please head over to AoF talk page to vote for which you think should recieve the AoF attention next. Voting ends on 06.02.08 at 8pm GMT.  Rezter  TALK  14:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Alice in Chains
Hey, thanks for the support! We oughta get Slipknot copyedited, that seems to be what is holding it back. &mdash; Burningclean &#91; Speak the truth! &#93; 21:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Slipknot AoF #2
The second AoF has been decided, Slipknot discography is the article chosen by vote. You can see what this task is for and its aims here. As you are a member of the project, your participation in this task is greatly welcomed and the quicker and better that we improve the article the more efficient the project will become. Please head over the the talk page and identify areas for improvement on the to-do list and begin to achieve these goals. Collaboration is the key word for the AoF and collaborating with 1 or more users on certain tasks is recommended, communications should be made on users talk pages.  Rezter  TALK  09:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

WP Korn
I thought that it was redirected to the main WP:Metal. Yeah, if it's not going anywhere, then we should probably just cancel it. Dark Executioner (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

AoF Reminder
I would just like to remind you as a member of the Slipknot Wikiproject that Nominations are open for the third AoF candidate so please, nominate the article which you think deserves the AoF attention over at the talk page. Thanks very much and I would also like to say that work on the discography page is coming along good but all members are recommended to collaborate in helping develop the article.  Rezter  TALK  11:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Nu-funk and Funktronica
Hi Thundermaster. I had actually been researching the use of nu-funk as a term, since that was the article that you had nominated for deletion. In the seven references I added, I didn't come across any evidence that funktronica was an equivalent term. I suspect that there are subtle differences although I do not know enough about this type of music to say what those differences are. I don't think they should be merged unless there is some compelling evidence that they actually are referring to the same type of music. Maybe contact the editor who wrote Funktronica? One option would be to put Nu-funk in the See also section instead of at the start of the article. -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 14:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * P.S. Funktronica does appear to be a term that is in use. -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 14:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, as you can see I've researched the use of funktronica. Again, in all those references, I did not find any evidence that nu-funk is an equivalent term. Cheers, -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 15:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I see, like two close genres, indie pop and indie rock or glam rock and glam metal... Thanks for reading, ThunderMaster  UTC  14:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I think it is likely that they are two close genres. Cheers, -- Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 15:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dark metal
A tag has been placed on Dark metal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Zouavman   Le   Zouave   12:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Dark metal
The bloody article is back. Maybe we should create the redirect once it's speedied, then request protection to stop people creating that stupid excuse for an article. Thanks for reading, ThunderMaster  UTC  13:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Exactly what I had in mind. :) But what shall it redirect to? By the way, sorry for the inconvenient automatic message on your talk page, I was and am aware that you are not the one involved in the recreation of the article. Regards,  Zouavman   Le   Zouave   15:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Adoption
Hey I see you're keen to adopt a new user of Wikipedia. I just started using Wikipedia a few days ago and would like to learn the ropes a bit more. I'm also into metal so I thought you might be a good person to get help from as my first edit was made on the article for the band "Agalloch".

-Geoff

Okay sounds cool, I'll let you know if I'm having any troubles. AutumnStorms (talk) 03:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Slipknot AoF #3
The third AoF has been decided, Iowa (album) is the article chosen by default due to single nomination. You can see what this task is for and its aims here. As you are a member of the Slipknot WikiProject, your participation in this task is greatly welcomed and the quicker and better that we improve the article, the more efficient the project will become. Please head over the the talk page and identify areas for improvement on the to-do list and begin to achieve these goals. Collaboration is the key word for the AoF and collaborating with 1 or more users on certain tasks is recommended, communications can be made on the articles talk page or on user's talk pages. Nominations are now open for the fourth AoF so head over to the AoF talk page and nominate which article you think should recieve the attention next.  REZTER  TALK   &oslash;  22:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)