User talk:Thursfields

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Thursfieldslogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Thursfieldslogo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mtking (talk) 12:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Thursfields, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 12:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. --jpgordon:==( o ) 17:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * You have not responded to the 3 key questions above. If your intent is to create an article about a non-notable company with whom who have COI, then you will not be unblocked for any reason.  You may simple respond to this and the 3 questions without an additional unblock request, as any of the admins on unblock patrol will be able to make determinations/ask further questions. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:50, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * It is perhaps unfortunate that you have been given a block notice which says "Your username is the only reason for this block", as this is not the only issue. You are unlikely to be blocked as long as it looks plausible that your only intention is to use Wikipedia to promote your business, which is what you have done so far. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * You are not going to be allowed to promote or advertise your firm of solicitors. What other, unrelated, edits do you intend to make if unblocked? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thursfieldslogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Thursfieldslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:38, 1 June 2011 (UTC)