User talk:ThurstonMitchell

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, ThurstonMitchell

Thank you for creating Martha S. Pope.

User:Whoisjohngalt, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whoisjohngalt (talk) 19:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Are you aware that one of your pages that you had recently created is currently being discussed on WikiProject Women in Red?
Are you aware that your page Martha S. Pope is currently being discussed (in a good way) on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red? One editor believes that the article is "indeed very interesting and recent enough for a DYK. Additional sources would be welcome!" If you have not done so, you might want to take a look at the comments and consider submitting the article for WP:DYK and get the credit for its creation! -- 96.64.134.61 (talk) 02:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * BTW, you might want to add your comments to the discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red since some editors have brought up some good questions about Martha S. Pope. -- 96.64.134.61 (talk) 01:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I have no comments. Someone posted it somewhere as a red link.  I never heard of her.  Found enough interesting sources.  Started the article. It’s nice to know that others find her interesting but maybe you can find the person who asked that the article be created in the first place.

Honestly
I wouldn’t bother with the creation of Ngozi Ezike tbh I don’t see any notability criteria it satisfies. Celestina007 (talk) 00:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

That is your opinion and you are entitled to it. But multiple directors of state health departments have articles about them and she should be no different than any of those other health department heads. If you have an issue with it, feel free to take it to AFD. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 00:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

And please don’t be foolish enough to comment on notability when an article is still being crafted and has an in use tag on it. You never know what will be added. At least wait to comment until the editor takes off the in use tag to decide it you think a subject is wiki worthy or not. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 00:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Sally Ling for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sally Ling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sally Ling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lynn (pastor) (2nd nomination)


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Lynn (pastor) (2nd nomination) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/David Lynn (preacher). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fences &amp;  Windows  17:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Europe contest
Hi ThurstonMitchell, Thanks for jumping right into the continental challenge for Europe. The two article you added are too short (right now) to be included as official entries (running text or readable prose size of 160 words or 1,000 characters). I had neglected to add a section for stubs when I created the page. I have added it now and moved your articles down to that section. Thank you for adding the RedLinks earlier! Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021
Hello, I'm MaynardClark. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_A._Cash have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. What is the purpose of your systematically removing the link from page after page of Harvard Faculty who also teach in the College and University? MaynardClark (talk) 23:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Nothing is presented in the article that indicates he teaches elsewhere in the University.  If he does, than put it in the article, cite it, and add the appropriate subcategory.   As it stands thought, and as I see it based solely on what the article says, Cash teaches only at HUSPH and to include the category for their faculty as well as the parent category is redundant. Why not then add faculty at American public health schools in the US and faculty for public health schools in North America and the faculty for public health schools worldwide?  And let’s not forget faculty of Boston colleges, faculty for Suffolk County, MA colleges, faculty for MA colleges, faculty for New England Colleges, faculty for Northeastern US colleges, faculty for North American colleges, ...  you gotta draw the line somewhere.         When and if you show he teaches at another division of Harvard University, there is no need to categorize him elsewhere. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 00:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Eva Weigold Schultz moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Eva Weigold Schultz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Manual moves
Hi Thurston, while your move on the College of Media page was in good faith, please open a request to move to change the page name. Blanking the page and replacing it with a redirect breaks the article history and can be very damaging. Thanks! JustinMal1 (talk) 13:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * JustinMal1, moving does nothing to break the article history or to be damaging in any other way, and doesn't need a requested move when it is obvious that the current title is not appropriate. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Phil, Thurston had manually blanked the page rather than using the move page feature to do so. The requested name was taken by the article redirect and would have required a technical move request. I fixed the issue already, but thank you for clarifying my statement. I was attempting to give the most relevant advice to Thurston, who is new. I can understand why giving reasoning for this specific issue can be misleading for a new editor. Thanks, JustinMal1 (talk) 02:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi ThurstonMitchell! I have noticed that, when you're not using HotCat's autogenerated summaries, you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than nothing. Thanks, and keep up the good category work! &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 19:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

American political scientists cats
Hey, thanks for your work categorizing American academics. I watch a lot of pages about American political scientists and I have noticed a few times that you've taken people out of Category:American political scientists without explanation. Are those pages in diffusing subcategories of that category? As far as I can see there is no place to diffuse them into. Are they being removed on the basis of sourcing or contents? - Astrophobe  (talk) 23:23, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Frances L. Willoughby moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Frances L. Willoughby, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  12:20, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Non-diffusing categories
When you created Category:American women statisticians you should have created it as a non-diffusing subcategory of Category:American statisticians, as we generally do this for all ethnic/gender-based subcategories to avoid ghettoizing their subjects. I have corrected your mistake by tagging it as non-diffusing. However, because you failed to tag it as non-diffusing, you also incorrectly removed all of its members from the parent category Category:American statisticians. Please re-add them. All of them. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, in some cases such as Kate Claghorn and Margaret Jarman Hagood you removed them from unrelated categories (Category:American sociologists), I assume by mistake. Please fix these cases and check that you have not made similar mistakes for others. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You're still doing it! diff. The next time I see you changing categories of any article on my watchlist before fixing the mess you have already made with non-diffusing categories, I will block you. Put them all back into the non-diffusing parent category. Now. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ThurstonMitchell, I have been editing Wikipedia for about 14 years and have no idea what a non-diffusing category is. That is fine because I do not create any categories or get involved with them apart from occasionally adding a category to an article. However, if you do get involved in such things you should learn something about them and take advice from editors who are well-versed in the subject. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It might be worth knowing that I raised a similar issue earlier this month here. I also attempted to start a conversation about it half a year ago here. In neither case was I successful in eliciting a response from ThurstonMitchell. The ghettoization of American women political scientists into their own subcategory was fixed about four months later by Ser Amantio. - Astrophobe  (talk) 18:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alicia Guadalupe Buenrostro Massieu


A tag has been placed on Alicia Guadalupe Buenrostro Massieu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/iaea-general-conference-elects-alicia-buenrostro-massieu-of-mexico-as-conference-president. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sam Sailor 21:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Lack of categories
You tagged Arella Guirantes/College Statistical Totals partially because it had no categories. The sub pages is subject to an AFD in progress Articles for deletion/Tasha Pointer/College Statistical Totals. One of the participants in that discussion noted the lack of categorization and I agreed that ought to be remedied. I thought it would be best to let the AFD run its course – no point in coming up with a categorization if it's going to be deleted. Plus, it's not obvious which category should apply and I'd like to have a discussion to determine how best to categorize it if it's going to remain. I'd be curious to know how this came to your attention. Did it pop up because it wasn't categorized or by some other process?-- S Philbrick (Talk)  19:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:LaQuandra S. Nesbitt
Hello, ThurstonMitchell. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LaQuandra S. Nesbitt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anita Pipan


A tag has been placed on Anita Pipan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.gov.si/en/news/2021-06-29-ambassador-anita-pipan-presents-her-credentials-in-geneva/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The copyright violation was only in the latest edit to this article, not the creation. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Katrina Cooper
Hello, ThurstonMitchell. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Katrina Cooper, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:LaQuandra S. Nesbitt


Hello, ThurstonMitchell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LaQuandra S. Nesbitt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Katrina Cooper


Hello, ThurstonMitchell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Katrina Cooper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:54, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Eva Weigold Schultz
Hello, ThurstonMitchell. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eva Weigold Schultz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your draft article, Draft:Rachel Miller


Hello, ThurstonMitchell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rachel Miller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ohio State University College of Social Work alumni


A tag has been placed on Category:Ohio State University College of Social Work alumni indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ohio State University College of Pharmacy alumni


A tag has been placed on Category:Ohio State University College of Pharmacy alumni indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ohio State University College of Public Health alumni


A tag has been placed on Category:Ohio State University College of Public Health alumni indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:Harvard College faculty has been nominated for merging
Category:Harvard College faculty has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 16:13, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:Faculty by education school has been nominated for renaming to
Category:Faculty by education school has been nominated for renaming to. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 15:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Faculty by public health school has been nominated for renaming to
Category:Faculty by public health school has been nominated for renaming to. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 15:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Gwyneth Kutz


The article Gwyneth Kutz has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. Only primary sources provided."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging