User talk:Tiago Justo

March 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Again Yamla I am not pursuing to keep violating WP:COI and WP:PROMO. From my previous response I thought it was clear I asked about what other Wiki editors thought about the topic and cause since I understand it is not up to me to write about this topic regardless of how Nobel and how many outsourcing links exists to the topic. But I can see we both struggle with English language, and me particularly with the Wikipedia's editing structure as I didn't mean to request the unblock, but just to reply back to Justlettersandnumbers feedback. So perhaps other editors will be able to advise on this. I just hope that if you are a woman or have a mother, wife or any other women in your life, that eventually when going through the menopause you understand the underlying reason for writing about this topic. Tiago Justo (talk) 16:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

With all due respect perhaps some feminine advise here would be greatly appreciated BrownHairedGirl and Diannaa as again by no means it was ever an intention to violate WP:COI and WP:PROMO. As a personal financial contributor to the wikipedia project I value everything it stands for, and if we are talking candidly here Yamla, I believe it is really unfair me or any other editors being aggressively labelled of violating WP:COI and WP:PROMO or being victims of shameful replies such as the one sent to Llewop Eidoj. I am pretty sure that those are not the values wikipedia stands for and needs to be addressed differently. It is not simply because there isn't a face to your voice that should enable you to have no guidelines on what to say nor how to say when addressing to other users that genuinely are willing to contribute to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiago Justo (talk • contribs)
 * Neither account has truthfully disclosed your conflict of interest. The other account (at least) has actively tried to mislead us about the conflict of interest. Enough. I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 16:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replaying Yamla. I have been made aware of that now and acknowledged that fact, for which once again I have already apologised. In any case, and with all due respect, any information provided was always sustained by reliable sources with no conflict of interests. take careTiago Justo (talk) 17:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Tiago Justo, if you want to be unblocked, you will have to:
 * convince us that you understand the reasons for your block, and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked (hint: you will need to clarify your relationship to Genius Brand and the various other parties involved in this mess)
 * describe in general terms the contributions that you might wish to make if you are unblocked; you should be aware (if you are not already) that Wikipedia has absolutely no interest whatsoever in advocacy or promotion of any kind. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)