User talk:Tiakat333

Joseph Bast
I strongly suggest you stay away from that article; you seem to be on a mission. Removing everything that is not verified is not a proper editing tactic: removal in a BLP must be done judiciously and I see no evidence that you have much justification for your edits. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you - as you can probably tell, I am still struggling to figure out how to properly make edits on wikipedia - I was hoping that flagging the article for deletion would lead to a fuller analysis of whether or not the standards of notability were really met, but with my limited editing skills I have not been able to figure out how to proceed with that process beyond added the "flag for deletion" tag. I will refrain from editing the page for now, but please know that my attempts to edit the page have been good-natured and done with the intention of ensuring info on Wikipedia is reliably and accurately sourced. Tiakat333 (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, it was discussed, and the decision was it's not to be deleted, so that matter for now is settled: it is frowned upon to nominate the same article twice within a short period. Deleting is not the same as sourcing, of course; if you can indicate that you have sourced things, then the deletion of other things doesn't look like you're trying to get rid of the article. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)