User talk:Tibor de Nagy

April 2013
Hello, Tibor de Nagy. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tibor de Nagy Gallery, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * You need not declare your conflict of interest, but we recommend it.
 * Do not edit articles about yourself, your organization, or your competitors. Do not edit related articles. (Exceptions.)
 * Post suggestions and sources on the article's talk page, or create a draft in your user space.
 * Your role is to summarize, inform and reference &mdash; not to promote, sell, or whitewash.
 * If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject.
 * Have us review your draft.
 * Work with us and we'll work with you.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 20:12, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Jane Freilicher, Pierrot and Peonies.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jane Freilicher, Pierrot and Peonies.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm CaroleHenson. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jane Freilicher, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.


 * ''Hello, Thanks for your edits to Jane Freilicher. I returned some of the original content because the additions weren't in the cited source, doing them one by one so you could see the reasoning in the edit summary. Do you have any sources (book, magazine, newspaper or other reliable source) for Freilicher's marriage ending in 2012, her being valedictorian and name of high school that she graduated from and/or that she was depicted in several films?


 * I also added a question on Talk:Jane Freilicher for you regarding the other paragraph that was added and whether you have a source for that.

Let me know if I can help.''  CaroleHenson   ( talk ) 22:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

02-20-2014

 * Hello to you CaroleHenson and thank you for you introduction and advice on editing! This is my first real experience with actively editing on Wikipedia so I really appreciate all the advice you can give me. Believe it or not but I had been gathering recourse for a Jane Freilicher page since April of last year but just never got on top of it so thank you for getting the ball rolling! I am going to continue to work on making minor/major edits and additions to Jane Freilicher page. I will do my best to make sure that any alterations are made based on citations. Please continue to advice me whenever you see fit. Thank you and I look forward to working with you!--written by User:Tibor de Nagy (added name by Carole Henson)
 * Hi, oh, that's great to hear! She seems like a very interesting women and it's lovely to have the article expanded. And, I'm happy to help where I can. One quick tip. If you add --~ after you finish your message on a talk page, it will format your user name with a date and timestamp when you save the message.


 * Please feel free to let me know if I can help out, and it would be great if I could run some things by you from time to time about art / artists.-- CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 21:34, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Wonderful! Freilicher is an impressive and important artist and it is very exciting to hear you speak so fondly of her! Please feel free to pass anything by me, I have an extensive library on Jane here and my hope is to continue to add reputable citations to her page. Thanks again and looking forward to hearing from you again.Tibor de Nagy (talk) 21:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Excellent! I'll look forward to seeing what more you have to add.-- CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 21:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Sun Breaks Through, 1991, oil on linen, 47 x 49.5 inches.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Sun Breaks Through, 1991, oil on linen, 47 x 49.5 inches.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Photo of Jane Freilicher.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Jane Freilicher.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Redsky89 (talk) 07:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)